본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Is a Cause-Related Self-Prevention Campaign a Good CSR Strategy?: Effects of Negative Social Acceptance and Consumer Attitude on Biased Evaluations

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

This paper addresses the central issue of whether it is effective for a firm to discourage the purchase of its own product in order to support a social cause. The objectives of this study were: a) to examine whether a cause-related self-prevention ad would stimulate more positive evaluations compared to promotional ad, particularly when the product category is more negatively socially accepted; and 2) to determine if a negative attitude toward the product could induce a boomerang effect of a selfprevention ad. Results from three experiments revealed that socially responsible prevention campaigns against firm’s own product may be more effective for the product category negatively associated with social concerns or welfare. If products are more limited in the social context, communications of product prevention are beneficial to improve the public image of the brand. However, the self-hurting approach may be inappropriate for potential customers who currently possess a strong negative attitude toward the product.

Abstract

This paper addresses the central issue of whether it is effective for a firm to discourage the purchase of its own product in order to support a social cause. The objectives of this study were: a) to examine whether a cause-related self-prevention ad would stimulate more positive evaluations compared to promotional ad, particularly when the product category is more negatively socially accepted; and 2) to determine if a negative attitude toward the product could induce a boomerang effect of a selfprevention ad. Results from three experiments revealed that socially responsible prevention campaigns against firm’s own product may be more effective for the product category negatively associated with social concerns or welfare. If products are more limited in the social context, communications of product prevention are beneficial to improve the public image of the brand. However, the self-hurting approach may be inappropriate for potential customers who currently possess a strong negative attitude toward the product.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Rohini Ahluwalia, "Examination of Psychological Processes Underlying Resistance to Persuasion", Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), pp.217~232 (2000), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  2. Leopoldo Arias-Bolzmann, "Effects of Absurdity in Advertising: The Moderating Role of Product Category Attitude and the Mediating Role of Cognitive Responses", Journal of Advertising, 29(1), pp.35~49 (2000), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  3. M. J. Barone, "The Influence of Cause-Related Marketing on Consumer Choice: Does One Good Turn Deserve Another?", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), pp.248~262 (2000), Springer Nature[DOI]
  4. Debra Z. Basil, "Attitudinal Balance and Cause-Related Marketing: An Empirical Application of Balance Theory", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), pp.391~403 (2006), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  5. Herbert Bless, "Mood and Persuasion", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16(2), pp.331~345 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  6. John T. Cacioppo, "Beyond Bipolar Conceptualizations and Measures: The Case of Attitudes and Evaluative Space", Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), pp.3~25 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  7. Margaret C. Campbell, "Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent", Journal of Consumer Research, 27(1), pp.69~83 (2000), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  8. Ellen, P. S, "Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix", Journal of Retailing, 76(3), pp.393~406 (2000)
  9. Etgar, M, "One-sided versus two-sided comparative message appeals for new brand introductions", Journal of Consumer Research, 8, pp.460~465 (1982)[DOI]
  10. Matthew C. Farrelly, "Getting to the Truth: Evaluating National Tobacco Countermarketing Campaigns", American Journal of Public Health, 92(6), pp.901~907 (2002), American Public Health Association[DOI]
  11. Linda L. Golden, "Comparative Analysis of the Relative Effectiveness of One- and Two- Sided Communication for Contrasting Products", Journal of Advertising, 16(1), pp.18~68 (1987), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  12. Shailendra Pratap Jain, "Motivated Reasoning: A Depth‐Of‐Processing Perspective", Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), pp.358~371 (2000), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  13. Eva Jonas, "Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(4), pp.557~571 (2001), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  14. Jones, E. E, "Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Vol. II", pp.219~266 (1965), Academic Press
  15. Michael A. Kamins, "Two-Sided versus One-Sided Appeals: A Cognitive Perspective on Argumentation, Source Derogation, and the Effect of Disconfirming Trial on Belief Change", Journal of Marketing Research, 24(1), pp.29~39 (1987), JSTOR[DOI]
  16. SEI-HILL KIM, "Stigmatizing Smokers: Public Sentiment Toward Cigarette Smoking and Its Relationship to Smoking Behaviors", Journal of Health Communication, 8(4), pp.343~367 (2003), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  17. John G. Lynch, Jr., "Memory and Attentional Factors in Consumer Choice: Concepts and Research Methods", Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), pp.18~37 (1982), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  18. Durairaj Maheswaran, "Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: Effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), pp.13~25 (1991), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  19. Satya Menon, "Corporate Sponsorships of Philanthropic Activities: When Do They Impact Perception of Sponsor Brand?", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), pp.316~327 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  20. Robert S. Moore, "The Sociological Impact of Attitudes Toward Smoking: Secondary Effects of the Demarketing of Smoking", The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(6), pp.703~718 (2005), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  21. "OECD factbook 2013: Economic, environmental and social statistics" (2013)[URL]
  22. G. Douglas Olsen, "Integration of Positive and Negative Affective Stimuli", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), pp.374~384 (2004), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  23. Joseph R. Priester, "Source Attributions and Persuasion: Perceived Honesty as a Determinant of Message Scrutiny", Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(6), pp.637~654 (2016), SAGE Publications[DOI]
  24. Eva M. Pomerantz, "Attitude strength and resistance processes.", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(3), pp.408~419 (1995), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
  25. Sanjay Putrevu, "Comparative and Noncomparative Advertising: Attitudinal Effects under Cognitive and Affective Involvement Conditions", Journal of Advertising, 23(2), pp.77~91 (1994), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  26. Robert B. Settle, "Attribution Theory and Advertiser Credibility", Journal of Marketing Research, 11(2), pp.181~185 (1974), JSTOR[DOI]
  27. Carolyn J Simmons, "Achieving Marketing Objectives Through Social Sponsorships", Journal of Marketing, 70(4), pp.154~169 (2006), American Marketing Association (AMA)[DOI]
  28. Robert E. Smith, "Attributional Processes and Effects in Promotional Situations", Journal of Consumer Research, 5(3), pp.149~158 (1978), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
  29. Douglas M. Stayman, "Encoding and Retrieval of Ad Affect in Memory", Journal of Marketing Research, 28(2), pp.232~239 (1991), JSTOR[DOI]
  30. Shirley Taylor, "Decomposition and crossover effects in the theory of planned behavior: A study of consumer adoption intentions", International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12(2), pp.137~155 (1995), Elsevier BV[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)