본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effects of Reputation and Congruence on Publics’ Evaluations of Corporate Social Responsibility

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류신문방송학

초록

This study investigated the effects of Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) programs moderated by the company reputation and congruence of CSR activity between the brand and the program. The reputation was manipulated by either good (snack company) or bad (tobacco company) and congruence was manipulated by high, low, or counter motivation. The experimental design was adopted with the sample of the general publics. Results suggest that highly reputed company received the more favorable CSR evaluations from the public than those of low reputed company. In addition, the highly reputed company’s fit between the brand and CSR was not important. However, for the low reputed company, low congruence was the most effective, followed by high congruence. Counter congruence CSR backfired because the public might perceive this activity to be self-denial, or a form of hypocrisy. It is concluded that highly reputed company enhances the company image by various CSR programs without fear of backfire.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) programs moderated by the company reputation and congruence of CSR activity between the brand and the program. The reputation was manipulated by either good (snack company) or bad (tobacco company) and congruence was manipulated by high, low, or counter motivation. The experimental design was adopted with the sample of the general publics. Results suggest that highly reputed company received the more favorable CSR evaluations from the public than those of low reputed company. In addition, the highly reputed company’s fit between the brand and CSR was not important. However, for the low reputed company, low congruence was the most effective, followed by high congruence. Counter congruence CSR backfired because the public might perceive this activity to be self-denial, or a form of hypocrisy. It is concluded that highly reputed company enhances the company image by various CSR programs without fear of backfire.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Andreasen, A, "Social marketing: Its Definition and Domain", of Public Policy and Marketing, 13(1), pp.108~114 (1994)
  2. Bae, J, "The Conditioning Effect of Prior Reputation on Perception of Corporate Giving", Public Relations Review, 32(2), pp.144~150 (2006)
  3. Bartling, E, "The Psychology of Asking and Giving", Association Management, 51(2), pp.55~60 (1999)
  4. Becker-Olson, "Questioning the Name Game: An Event Study Analysis of Stadium Naming Rights Sponsorship Announcements", International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship, 5(3), pp.181~192 (2003)
  5. Carroll, "The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders", Business Horizons, 34(4), pp.39~48 (1991)
  6. Clark, C, "The differences between public relations and corporate social responsibility: An analysis", Public Relations Review, 26(3), pp.363~380 (2000)
  7. Dawkins, J, "Corporate Responsibility: The Communication Challenge", Journal of Communication Management, 9(2), pp.108~119 (2004)
  8. Dean, D, "Associating the Corporation with a Charitable Event through Sponsorship: Measuring the Effects on Corporate Community Relations", Journal of Advertising, 31(4), pp.77~87 (2002)
  9. Dennis, B, "hop International: An Explanation of Corporate Social Responsibility", Management Decision, 36(10), pp.649~653 (1998)
  10. Drumwright, E, "Company Advertising with a Social Dimension: The Role of Non-economic Criteria", Journal of Marketing, 60, pp.71~87 (1996)
  11. Ellen, P, "Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs", Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), pp.147~157 (2006)
  12. Corporate Community Relations WhiteBook, "Federation of Korean Industries", Federation of Korean Industries, ~ (2009)
  13. Fein, S, "Effects of Suspicion on Attributional Thinking and the Correspondence Bias", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, pp.1164~1184 (1996)
  14. Folkes, V, "Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions", Journal of Consumer Research, 14, pp.548~565 (1998)
  15. Fombrun, C, "Building Corporate Reputation through CSR Initiatives: Evolving Standards", Corporate Reputation Review, 8(1), pp.7~11 (2005)
  16. Fombrun, C, "Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate Citizenship and Repetitional Risk", Business and Society Review, 105, pp.85~106 (2000)
  17. Friedstad, M., "The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts", Journal of Consumer Research, 21, pp.1~21 (1994)
  18. Haley, E, "Exploring the Construct of Organization as Source: Consumers’ Understanding of Organizational Sponsorship of Advocacy Advertising", Journal of Advertising, 25(Summer), pp.19~35. (1996)
  19. Hastings, G, "Social Marketing: Why Should the Devil Have All the Best Tunes" (2008), New York: Elsevier
  20. Heider, F, "The Psychology of International Relations" (1958), New York: Wiley
  21. Hoeffler, S., "Building Brand Equity through Corporate Societal Marketing", Journal of Public Policy and marketing, 21(1), pp.78~89 (2002)
  22. Javalgi, R, "Awareness of Sponsorship and Corporate Image: An Empirical Investigation", Journal of Advertising, 23(4), pp.47~58 (1994)
  23. Kelly,H, "The Process of Causal Attribution.American", American Psychologists, 28, pp.107~128 (1973)
  24. Kelley, H, "Attribution Theory and Research", Annual Review of Psychology, 31, pp.457~501 (1980)
  25. Kotler, P., "Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause" (2004), New York: John Wiley & Sons
  26. Lafferty, B., "Cause-Brand Alliances: Does the Cause Help the Brand or Does the Brand Help the Cause", Journal of Business Research, 58, pp.423~329 (2003)
  27. Lafferty, B., "The Impact of the Alliance on the Partners: a Look at Cause-Brand Alliances", Psychology and Marketing, 21(7), pp.509~531 (2004)
  28. Lantos, G, "The Boundaries of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility", Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), pp.595~630 (2001)
  29. Luo, X., "Corporate Social Responsibility, Customer Satisfaction and Market Value", Journal of Marketing, 70, pp.1~18 (2006)
  30. Menon, S, "Corporate Sponsorships of Philanthropic Activities: When Do They Impact Perception of Sponsor Brand", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, pp.316~327 (2003)
  31. Miller, K, "Consumer responses to socially questionable corporate behavior: An empirical test", Journal of Consumer Research, 4, pp.1~7 (1977)
  32. Mohr, L, "The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Price on Consume Responses", Journal of Consumer Affairs, 39(1), pp.121~147 (2005)
  33. Moon, Y. K, "A Study on the Orientation of Korean Corporate Social Responsibility", Research, 9, pp.151~182 (2005)
  34. Pringle, H, "Brand Spirit: How Cause Related Marketing Builds Brands" (1999), New York: John Wiley & Sons
  35. Rifon, N, "Congruence effects in sponsorship - The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive", JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 33(1), pp.29~42 (2004), M E SHARPE INC
  36. Sen, S, "Does Doing Good always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility", Journal of Marketing Research, 38, pp.225~243 (2001)
  37. Sheriff, M., "Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change" (1961), New Haven: Yale University Press
  38. Smith, C, "The New Corporate Philanthropy", Harvard Business Review, 72(3), pp.105~116 (1994)
  39. Varadarajan, P., "Cause Related Marketing: a Co-alignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy", Journal of Marketing, 52(3), pp.58~74 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)