초등 과학 수업에서 ‘반응적 교수’의 실현 가능성 탐색
An Exploration of the Possibility of Implementing ‘Responsive Teaching’ (RT) in Elementary Science Classrooms
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to explore the possibility of implementing ‘responsive teaching (RT)’ in elementary school science classrooms. A review of relevant literature yielded a tentative framework of RT which consisted of three characteristics of RT and example practices for each characteristic. The RT framework was used to analyze elementary science lessons on the topic of the transpiration in plant leaves. The data sources were audio recordings of three 5th grade classrooms which included both the whole-class instruction and student group activities. The data were examined through collaboration between the teacher who had taught the lessons and a university- based science education researcher. It was revealed that the implementation of RT was limited when the teacher’s intervention was focused on completing tasks; when it was out of the contexts of student activities; when the teacher provided earlier what students were supposed to find out by themselves; and when the teacher’s comments were evaluation-centered. By contrast, the implementation of RT was made highly possible when the teacher’s intervention induced an intellectual debate among students; when the teacher negotiated meanings with students; when the teacher connected what students shared to scientific knowledge; and when the teacher prompted students to solve a new problem. Implications about implementing and studying RT were discussed.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to explore the possibility of implementing ‘responsive teaching (RT)’ in elementary school science classrooms. A review of relevant literature yielded a tentative framework of RT which consisted of three characteristics of RT and example practices for each characteristic. The RT framework was used to analyze elementary science lessons on the topic of the transpiration in plant leaves. The data sources were audio recordings of three 5th grade classrooms which included both the whole-class instruction and student group activities. The data were examined through collaboration between the teacher who had taught the lessons and a university- based science education researcher. It was revealed that the implementation of RT was limited when the teacher’s intervention was focused on completing tasks; when it was out of the contexts of student activities; when the teacher provided earlier what students were supposed to find out by themselves; and when the teacher’s comments were evaluation-centered. By contrast, the implementation of RT was made highly possible when the teacher’s intervention induced an intellectual debate among students; when the teacher negotiated meanings with students; when the teacher connected what students shared to scientific knowledge; and when the teacher prompted students to solve a new problem. Implications about implementing and studying RT were discussed.
참고문헌 (34)
- 최경희, "중학교 과학 수업에서 교사와 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 24(6), pp.1039~1048 (2004), 한국과학교육학회
- Colley, C., "Rigor in elementary science students’ discourse : The role of responsiveness and supportive conditions for talk", Science Education, 100, pp.1009~1038 (2016)
- Eisner, W. E., "The art and craft of teaching", Educational Leadership, 40(4), pp.4~13 (1983)
- Elby, A., "Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice", pp.409~434 (2010), Cambridge University Press
- 하희수, "소집단 논변 활동에서 반응적 교수법이 학생들의 인식론적 프레이밍에 미치는 영향 탐색", 한국과학교육학회지, 37(1), pp.63~75 (2017), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- Hammer, D., "Student resources for learning introductory physics. Physics Education Research", American Journal of Physics, 68(Suppl. 7), pp.S52~S59 (2000)
- Hammer, D., "Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective", pp.89~120 (2005), Information Age Publishing
- Hammer, D., "Responsive teaching and the beginnings of energy in a third grade classroom. Review of Science", Mathematics and ICT Education, 6(1), pp.51~72 (2012)
- Hammer, D., "Implications of complexity for research on learning progressions", Science Education, 99(3), pp.424~431 (2015)
- Jaber, L. Z., "Responsive teaching in science and mathematics", pp.162~188 (2016), Routledge
- Jaber, L. Z., "Engaging in science : A feeling for the discipline", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 25(2), pp.156~202 (2016)
- Lee, H., "수업, 누구나 경험하지만 누구도 모르는" (2013), Education Community But
- 이혁규, "수업의 과학성과 예술성 논의와 수업 비평", 열린교육연구, 20(2), pp.305~325 (2012), 한국열린교육학회
- Lee, J. N., "수업 예술론" (2011), Mirae Heemang
- Levin, D. M., "Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking", Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), pp.142~154 (2009)
- Levin, D. M., "Becoming a responsive science teacher: Focusing on student thinking in secondary science" (2013), National Science Teachers Association Press
- Lineback, J. E., "The redirection : An indicator of how teachers respond to student thinking", The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24, pp.419~460 (2015)
- Maskiewicz, A. C., "Responsive teaching in science and mathematics", pp.105~125 (2016), Routledge
- Maskiewicz, A. C., "Understanding the co-construction of inquiry practices : A case study of a responsive teaching environment", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(4), pp.429~464 (2012)
- 남정희, "멘토링을 통한 초임중등과학교사의 수업에서의교사․학생 상호작용 변화 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 30(8), pp.953~970 (2010), 한국과학교육학회
- 오필석, "“채워지지 않는 잔(盞)”: 초등 교사들에게 있어 과학 수업의 의미", 한국과학교육학회지, 31(2), pp.271~294 (2011), 한국과학교육학회
- 오필석, "‘좋은’ 과학 수업에 관한 중등 과학 교사들의 사고", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(2), pp.405~424 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
- 오필석, "대안적 인지 이론으로서 ‘자원 기반 관점’에 대한 이론적 고찰과 시험 적용", 한국과학교육학회지, 35(6), pp.971~984 (2015), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 오필석, "인식 행위로서 수업 담화 분석: 초등 과학 수업을 중심으로", 초등과학교육, 32(3), pp.269~284 (2013), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 오필석, "고등학교 지구과학 수업의 담화적-인식적 기제 탐색", 한국지구과학회지, 36(4), pp.390~403 (2015), 한국지구과학회
- 오필석, "Understanding of Science Classrooms in Different Countries through the Analysis of Discourse Modes for Building ‘Classroom Science Knowledge’ (CSK)", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(3), pp.597~625 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
- Otsuji, H., "Science education research and practice in East Asia", pp.245~272 (2016), Higher Education Publishing Company
- Richards, J., "Responsive teaching in science and mathematics", pp.36~55 (2016), Routledge
- Robertson, A. D., "Responsive teaching in science and mathematics", pp.1~35 (2016), Routledge
- Robertson, A. D., "Responsive teaching in science and mathematics" (2016), Routledge
- Robertson, A. D., "Responsive teaching in science and mathematics", pp.227~253 (2016), Routledge
- 송하영, "과학 수업에서 공진화적 접근을 통한 교사와 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석", 생물교육, 44(1), pp.13~24 (2016), 한국생물교육학회[DOI]
- The Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology, (2011), Kumsung
- van Zee, E., "Using questioning to guide student thinking", The Journal of Learning Sciences, 6(2), pp.227~269 (1997)