본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

열 개념에 대한 흥미와 학생이 인식하는 과제난이도 수준이 과학상태호기심 유발에 미치는 영향

The Effects of Interest in Thermal Concepts and the Perceived Task Difficulty on Science State Curiosity

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

본 연구의 목적은 열 개념에 대한 흥미와 학생이 인식하는 과제난이도 수준이 과학상태호기심 유발에 어떠한 영향을 미치는지를 알아보는 것이다. 이를 위해 초등학교 5∼6학년 410명을 대상으로 열 개념 과제의 내용에 대한 흥미와 과제를 해결하면서 학생이 인식하는 과제난이도 및 과학상태호기심을 측정하였다. 과학상태호기심 유발에 영향을 미칠 것으로 예상되는 학생의 과학호기심 수준을 공변량으로 하여 2(흥미 낮음 vs 흥미 높음)×2(난이도 쉬움 vs 난이도 어려움) ANCOVA를 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 과제의 내용에 대한 흥미가 높은 학생이 과학상태호기심도 높게 유발되었다. 한편, 학생이 인식하는 과제난이도에 따라 유발되는 과학상태호기심 수준은 차이가 없었다. 그리고 과제의 내용에 대한 흥미가 낮은 학생은 과제를 쉽다고 인식할 경우 과학상태호기심이 높게 유발되었으나, 흥미가 높은 학생은 과제를 어렵다고 인식할 경우 과학상태호기심이 높게 유발되었다. 본 연구는 해당 과제의 내용에 대한 흥미가 과학상태호기심 유발에 영향을 주며, 과제난이도 수준에 따라 흥미가 과학상태호기심 유발에 미치는 영향이 달라진다는 것을 실증적으로 검증하였다는 점에서 의미가 있다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out how interest in thermal concepts and the perceived difficulty affect the stimulation of science state curiosity. To achieve this purpose, 410 elementary school students in 5th to 6th grade were asked to measure interest in the content of the thermal concept tasks, the perceived difficulty and science state curiosity while solving the thermal concept tasks. 2 (low interest vs. high interest)×2 (easy vs. difficult) ANCOVA was conducted with the covariate of the student’s level of science curiosity, which is expected to affect the stimulation of science state curiosity. As a result of the analysis, students with high interest in the contents of the task were showed high science state curiosity. Meanwhile, there was no difference in the level of science state curiosity according to the perceived difficulty. In addition, science state curiosity level of the students with low interest in the content of the task were high when they perceived the task as easy, but science state curiosity level of the students with high interest in the content of the task were high when they perceived the task as difficult. This study was meaningful in that it empirically verified that interest in the content of the tasks has an effect on the stimulation of science state curiosity, and that the effect of interest on the stimulation of science state curiosity varies according to the level of the perceived difficulty.

참고문헌 (65)

  1. Ainley, M., "Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship", Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), pp.545~561 (2002)
  2. Anderson, R. C., "Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Conative and affective process analyses Vol. 3", pp.287~299 (1987), Lawrence Erlbaum
  3. Arkes, H. R., "Competence and the over justification effect", Motivation and Emotion, 3(2), pp.143~150 (1979)
  4. Arnone, M. P., "Curiosity, interest and engagement in technology-pervasive learning environments : A new research agenda", Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(2), pp.181~198 (2011)
  5. Ayres, P., "Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems", Learning and Instruction, 16(5), pp.389~400 (2006)
  6. Bathgate, M. E., "Children’s motivation toward science across contexts, manner of interaction, and topic", Science Education, 98(2), pp.189~215 (2014)
  7. Berlyne, D. E, "Conflict, arousal, and curiosity" (1960), McGraw-Hill
  8. Boyle, G. J., "Delimitation of state-trait curiosity in relation to state anxiety and learning task performance", Australian Journal of Education, 23(1), pp.70~82 (1979)
  9. Boyle, G. J., "Critical review of state-trait curiosity test development", Motivation and Emotion, 7(4), pp.377~397 (1983)
  10. Brindley, J, "Guidelines for the development of curriculum resource", pp.45~56 (1987), National Curriculum Resource Centre
  11. Clifford, M. M., "Effects of competition as a motivational technique in the classroom", American Educational Research Journal, 9(1), pp.123~137 (1972)
  12. DeLeeuw, P. E., "A comparison of three measures of cognitive load : Evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load", Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), pp.223~234 (2008)
  13. Dewey, J., "Interest and effort in education" (1913), Riverside Press
  14. Gardner, P. L., "Interest in biology. part Ⅰ : A multidimensional construct", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26(5), pp.409~423 (1989)
  15. Grossnickle, E. M., "Disentangling curiosity : Dimensionality, definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contexts", Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), pp.23~60 (2016)
  16. Gruber, M. J., "State of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit", Neuron, 84(2), pp.486~496 (2014)
  17. Halliday, D., "Principles of physics: Extended" (2011), John Wiley & Sons
  18. Haussler, P., "Measuring students’ interest in physics", International Journal of Science Education, 9(1), pp.19~92 (1987)
  19. Henderson, B., "Measuring exploratory behavior in young children : A factor-analytic study", Developmental Psychology, 15(2), pp.113~119 (1979)
  20. Henderson, B., "Children’s exploratory behavior in a novel field setting", Ethology and Sociobiology, 3(2), pp.93~99 (1982)
  21. Hidi, S., "Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning", Review of Educational Research, 60(4), pp.549~571 (1990)
  22. Hom, Jr. H. L., "The impact of task difficulty expectations on intrinsic motivation", Motivation and Emotion, 7(1), pp.19~24 (1983)
  23. Honeyfield, J, "Simplification: Theory and practice", pp.127~138 (1993), Regional Language Center
  24. Im, S., "An analysis of multi-dimension of students’ interest in learning physics", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(4), pp.491~504 (2000)
  25. 정미미, "Two-way ANOVA 분석절차 및 사후검증방법의 이해", 한국체육측정평가학회지, 13(2), pp.1~15 (2011), 한국체육측정평가학회[DOI]
  26. 강지훈, "열과 관련된 문제 상황에서 초등학생들이 느끼는 친숙도, 인지에 대한 지각, 상태호기심, 상태불안의 관계 분석", 초등과학교육, 39(3), pp.433~448 (2020), 한국초등과학교육학회[DOI]
  27. Kang, J., "Characteristics and learning effects of elementary school students’ state curiosity and state anxiety in science learning", Ph. D, pp.2021
  28. 강지훈, "과학 상태호기심 및 과학 상태불안 측정도구 개발", 한국과학교육학회지, 40(5), pp.485~502 (2020), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  29. Kang, M. J., "The wick in the candle of learning: Epistemic curiosity activates reward circuitry and enhances memory", Psychological Science, 20(8), pp.963~973 (2009)
  30. Kashdan, T. B., "The curiosity and exploration inventory-II : Development, factor structure, and psychometrics", Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), pp.987~998 (2009)
  31. Keppel, G, "Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook" (1991), Prentice Hall
  32. 김홍정, "비형식 과학교육환경에서 초등학생들의 과학 학습에 대한 흥미 분석", 초등과학교육, 31(1), pp.125~134 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
  33. 김홍정, "2009 개정 교육과정 고등학교‘과학’에 대한 학생의 흥미 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(1), pp.17~29 (2013), 한국과학교육학회
  34. 김민기, "Causal relationships among students' attitude, interest, conceptual understanding, and school achievement in secondary physics", 박사, 물리(과학교육과), pp.2008
  35. Kim, S., "The role of interest in text comprehension", The Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 8(2), pp.273~301 (1996)
  36. 고호경, "고등학교 수리영역 시험의 난이도 예측 요인 분석", 한국학교수학회논문집, 10(1), pp.113~127 (2007), 한국학교수학회
  37. Koballa, T. R. Jr., "Handbook for research in science education", pp.75~102 (2007)
  38. Erlbaum. Lavonen, J., "Research findings on young people’s perceptions of technology and science education" (2005), Technology Industries of Finland
  39. 이광호, "고등학교 수학 문제의 난이도 요인 분석을 위한 사례 연구", 한국학교수학회논문집, 13(2), pp.323~343 (2010), 한국학교수학회
  40. 이상하, "대학수학능력시험 수리 영역 문항 난이도 예측을 위한 회귀모형 추정", 수학교육, 46(4), pp.407~421 (2007), 한국수학교육학회
  41. Li, W., "The role of perceptions of task difficulty in relation to self-perceptions of ability, intrinsic value, attainment value, and performance", European Physical Education Review, 3(3), pp.301~318 (2007)
  42. Litman, J. A., "Measuring epistemic curiosity and its diversive and specific components", Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), pp.75~86 (2003)
  43. Litman, J. A., "Epistemic curiosity, feeling of knowing, and exploratory behavior", Cognition and Emotion, 19(4), pp.559~582 (2005)
  44. Loewenstein, G., "The psychology of curiosity : A review and reinterpretation", Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), pp.75~98 (1994)
  45. Lynch, R., "The impact of task difficulty and performance scores on student engagement and progression", Educational Research, 55(3), pp.291~303 (2013)
  46. McGillivray, S., "Thirst for knowledge : The effects of curiosity and interest on memory in younger and older adults", Psychology and Aging, 30(4), pp.835~841 (2015)
  47. Naylor, F. D., "A state-trait curiosity inventory", Australian Psychologist, 16(2), pp.172~183 (1981)
  48. Park, J. S., "The emotional effects of interest-type and deprivation-type of epistemic curiosity: The perfect mediating role of actual self", Master, pp.2008
  49. 박문환, "대학수학능력시험 난이도 관련 변인 탐색", 수학교육학연구, 14(1), pp.71~88 (2004), 대한수학교육학회
  50. Park, T., "Relationship between task difficulty and EEG pattern in choice reaction tasks", 대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집, pp.321~325 (2000)
  51. Piaget, J., "Toward a logic of meanings" (1991), Erlbaurn
  52. Robinson, P., "Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production : Exploring interactions in a componential framework", Applied Linguistics, 22(1), pp.27~57 (2001)
  53. 류지헌, "학습자의 전문성 수준과 과제난이도가 인지부하요인 및 과제수행에 미치는 영향", 교육정보미디어연구, 15(4), pp.1~19 (2009), 한국교육정보미디어학회
  54. Scasserra, D., "The influence of perceived task difficulty on task performance", Master, pp.2008
  55. Schiefele, U., "Interest, learning, and motivation", Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), pp.299~323 (1991)
  56. Seong, T, "알기 쉬운 통계분석" (2019), Hakjisa
  57. Shin, D. D., "Homo curious: Curious of interest?", Educational Psychology Review, 31(5), pp.853~874 (2019)
  58. Skehan, P., "A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction", Applied Linguistics, 17(1), pp.38~62 (1996)
  59. Spielberger, C. D., "Preliminary manual for the State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI)" (1979), University of South Florida
  60. Van Velsor, E., "The center for creative leadership: Handbook of leadership development", pp.1~22 (2004), Jossey-Bass
  61. Vygotsky, L. A., "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  62. Weible, J. F., "Science curiosity in learning environments : Developing an attitudinal scale for research in schools, homes, museums, and the community", International Journal of Science Education, 38(8), pp.1235~1255 (2016)
  63. Won, H., "A study on the mismatch of level of difficulty between teachers and learners in Korean achievement test", Journal of Educational Innovation Research, 22(3), pp.1~23 (2012)
  64. 양미란, "The Effects of Task Difficulty on Learners' Attention to Meaning and Form during Focus-on-Form Instruction", Foreign Languages Education, 15(3), pp.27~52 (2008), 한국외국어교육학회
  65. 유진은, "교육학 연구에서 ANCOVA에 대한 오해와 오용", 학습자중심교과교육연구, 13(6), pp.27~49 (2013), 학습자중심교과교육학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)