고려상표군을 이용한 내구재 시장구조 분석에 관한 연구:자동차 시장에 대한 탐색적 분석방법
A Study on the Market Structure Analysis for Durable Goods Using Consideration Set:An Exploratory Approach for Automotive Market
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
시장구조 분석에서 흔히 사용되는 상표전환 자료는 비내구재 분석에 적절한 방법이 될 수 있으나 자동차 같이 사용연한이 장시간인 내구재의 경우에는 소비자의 상표에 대한 선호도가 변할 수 있어 상표전환 자료의 사용에 문제가 있다. 따라서 경쟁을 잘 포착할 수 있는 다른 접근이 필요하다. 본 연구는 이에 대한 대안으로 상표간 경쟁 자료로써 고려상표군을 이용하여 자동차 시장의 구조를 Latent Class 군집분석을 활용한 탐색적 검증방법으로 분석하였다. 또한 소비자 행동분석에 근거하여 상표간 경쟁의 근간을 이루는 고려상표군 형성에 영향을 미치는 인자들을 밝히는데 중점을 두었다. 미국 자동차 시장을 대상으로 분석한 결과, 시장은 상표 원산지 효과에 의해 구분되었다. 즉, 미국 상표, 유럽 상표, 그리고 아시아 상표 등으로 시장이 구분되었다. 또한 각 시장구조 내 소비자들의 고려상표군 형성에 신뢰성/안전, 이미지/즐거움, 경제성 등의 편익과 성별, 소득 등 개인적 요인이 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다.
Abstract
Brand switching data frequently used in market structure analysis is adequate to analyze non- durable goods, because it can capture competition between specific two brands. But brand switching data sometimes can not be used to analyze goods like automobiles having long term duration because one of main assumptions that consumer preference toward brand attributes is not changed against time can be violated. Therefore a new type of data which can precisely capture competition among durable goods is needed. Another problem of using brand switching data collected from actual purchase behavior is short of explanation why consumers consider different set of brands. Considering above problems, main purpose of this study is to analyze market structure for durable goods with consideration set. The author uses exploratory approach and latent class clustering to identify market structure based on heterogeneous consideration set among consumers. Then the relationship between some factors and consideration set formation is analyzed. Some benefits and two demographic variables – age and income – are selected as factors based on consumer behavior theory. The author analyzed USA automotive market with top 11 brands using exploratory approach and latent class clustering. 2,500 respondents are randomly selected from the total sample and used for analysis. Six models concerning market structure are established to test. Model 1 means non-structured market and model 6 means market structure composed of six sub-markets. It is exploratory approach because any hypothetical market structure is not defined. * Business Administration, Korea Nazarene University The result showed that model 1 is insufficient to fit data. It implies that USA automotive market is a structured market. Model 3 with three market structures is significant and identified as the optimal market structure in USA automotive market. Three sub markets are named as USA brands, Asian Brands, and European Brands. And it implies that country of origin effect may exist in USA automotive market. Comparison between modal classification by derived market structures and probabilistic classification by research model was conducted to test how model 3 can correctly classify respondents. The model classify 97% of respondents exactly. The result of this study is different from those of previous research. Previous research used confirmatory approach. Car type and price were chosen as criteria for market structuring and car type-price structure was revealed as the optimal structure for USA automotive market. But this research used exploratory approach without hypothetical market structures. It is not concluded yet which approach is superior. For confirmatory approach, hypothetical market structures should be established exhaustively, because the optimal market structure is selected among hypothetical structures. On the other hand, exploratory approach has a potential problem that validity for derived optimal market structure is somewhat difficult to verify. There also exist market boundary difference between this research and previous research. While previous research analyzed seven car brands, this research analyzed eleven car brands. Both researches seemed to represent entire car market, because cumulative market shares for analyzed brands exceeds 50%. But market boundary difference might affect the different results. Though both researches showed different results, it is obvious that country of origin effect among brands should be considered as important criteria to analyze USA automotive market structure. This research tried to explain heterogeneity of consideration sets among consumers using benefits and two demographic factors, sex and income. Benefit works as a key variable for consumer decision process, and also works as an important criterion in market segmentation. Three factors - trust/ safety, image/fun to drive, and economy - are identified among nine benefit related measure. Then the relationship between market structures and independent variables is analyzed using multinomial regression. Independent variables are three benefit factors and two demographic factors. The result showed that all independent variables can be used to explain why there exist different market structures in USA automotive market. For example, a male consumer who perceives all benefits important and has lower income tends to consider domestic brands more than European brands. And the result also showed benefits, sex, and income have an effect to consideration set formation. Though it is generally perceived that a consumer who has higher income is likely to purchase a high priced car, it is notable that American consumers perceived benefits of domestic brands much positive regardless of income. Male consumers especially showed higher loyalty for domestic brands. Managerial implications of this research are as follow. Though implication may be confined to the USA automotive market, the effect of sex on automotive buying behavior should be analyzed. The automotive market is traditionally conceived as male consumers oriented market. But the proportion of female consumers has grown over the years in the automotive market. It is natural outcome that Volvo and Hyundai motors recently developed new cars which are targeted for women market. Secondly, the model used in this research can be applied easier than that of previous researches. Exploratory approach has many advantages except difficulty to apply for practice, because it tends to accompany with complicated model and to require various types of data. The data needed for the model in this research are a few items such as purchased brands, consideration set, some benefits, and some demographic factors and easy to collect from consumers.
참고문헌 (31)
- 이서구, "저관여 소비재의 시장구조 분석에 관한 연구", 상업교육연구, 25(1), pp.115~134 (2011), 한국상업교육학회
- 장광필, "고려상표군을 반영한 자동차 시장구조 분석모형", 마케팅연구, 18(2), pp.53~67 (2003), 한국마케팅학회
- 최인혜, "Market Structure Analysis of Automobile Market in U.S.A", Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구), 18(1), pp.141~156 (2008), 한국마케팅과학회
- 한상만, "소비자의 다양성추구 성향에 따른 고려상표군 형성에 관한 비교 연구", 마케팅연구, 12(1), pp.49~76 (1997)
- Banfield, Jeffrey D, "Model-based Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Clustering", Biometrics, 49(3), pp.803~821 (1993)
- Bucklin, Randolph E, "Determining Interbrand SubstitutabilityThrough Survey Measurement of ConsumerPreference Structures", Journal of MarketingResearch, 28(1), pp.58~71 (1991)
- Cooper, Lee. G, "Building Market Structures from Consumer Preference", Journal of Marketing Research, 33(3), pp.293~306 (1996)
- Day, George S, "Customer-Oriented Approaches to Identifying Product-Markets", Journal of Marketing, 43(4), pp.8~19 (1979)
- DeSarbo, Wayne S, "The Spacial Representation of HeterogeneousConsideration Sets", Marketing Science, 14(3), pp.326~342 (1995)
- Elrod, Terry, "Inferring Market Structure from Customer Response to Competing Products", Marketing Letters, 13, pp.221~232 (2002)
- Grover, Rajiv, "A Probabilistic Model for Testing Hypothesized Hierarchical Market Structures", Marketing Science, 4(4), pp.312~335 (1985)
- Grover, Rajiv, "A Simultaneous Approach to Market Segmentation and Market Structuring", Journal of Marketing Research, 24(2), pp.139~153 (1987)
- Hagenaars, Jacques A, "Latent structure models with direct effects between indicators : local dependence models", Sociological Methods and Research, 16, pp.379~405 (1988)
- Hauser, John R, "The Competitive Implications of Relevantset", Response Analysis, "Journal of MarketingResearch, 1989, pp.26(4), 391~405
- 박준욱, "A dynamic choice map approach to modeling attribute-level varied behavior among stockkeeping units", JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 45(1), pp.94~103, AMER MARKETING ASSOC
- Jain, Dipak, "Estimation of Latent Class Modelswith Heterogeneous Choice Probabilities : An Application to Market Structuring", Journal of Marketing Research, 27(1), pp.94~101 (1990)
- Kumar, Ajith, "Confirmatory Analysis of Aggregate Hierachical Market Structures : Inferences from Brand-Switching Behavior", Journal of Marketing Research, 26(4), pp.444~453 (1989)
- Magidson, Jay, "Latent Class Models for Clustering : AComparison with K-means", Canadian Journalof Marketing Research, 20, pp.37~44 (2002)
- Paulssen, Marcel, "Goal Hierarchies As Antecedents of MarketStructure", Psychology & Marketing, 23(8), pp.689~709 (2006)
- Punj, Girish, "Decision Constraints and Consideration-Set Formation in Consumer Durables", Psychology & Marketing, 18(8), pp.843~863 (2001)
- Ramaswamy, Venkatram, "SCULPTRE : A New Methodology fro Deriving and Analyzing Hierarchical Product-Market Structures from Panel Data", Journal of Marketing Research, 27(4), pp.418~427 (1990)
- Rao, Vithala R, "Inferences of Hierarchical Choice Processesfrom Panel Data", Journal of ConsumerResearch, 8(1), pp.85~96 (1981)
- Ratneshwar, S, "Substitution in Use and the Role of UsageContext in Product Category Structures", Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), pp.281~295 (1999)
- Ratneshwar, S, "Product, Person, and Purpose : Putting the Consumer Back into Theories of Dynamics Market Behavior", Journal of Strategic Marketing, 7(3), pp.191~208 (1999)
- Roberts, John H, "Development and Testing of a Model ofConsideration Set Composition, "Journal ofMarketing Research", Journal ofMarketing Research, 28(4), pp.429~440 (1991)
- Russell, Gary J, "Identifying Multiple Preference Segments from Own-and Cross-Price Elasticities", Marketing Letters, 4(1), pp.5~18 (1993)
- Shocker, Allan D, "Consideration Set Influences on Consumer Decision-Making and Choice : Issues, Models, and Suggestions", Marketing Letters, 2(3), pp.181~197 (1991)
- Siddarth, S, "Making the Cut: Modeling and Analyzing Choice Set Restrictions in Scanner Panel Data", Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), pp.255~266 (1995)
- Urban, Glen L, "Testing Competitive Market Structures", Marketing Science, 3(2), pp.83~112 (1984)
- Vermunt, Jeroen K, "Applied Latent Class analysis" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Wedel, Michel, "Market Segmentation : Concepts and Methodological Foundations" (1998), Kluwer Academic Publishers
