매매계약과 계약금 약정의 법률관계 검토 - 대법원 2008.3.13선고 2007다73611 사건 중심으로 -
Review of Legal Relationship between Purchase & Sale Agreement and Contract Deposit Clause in the Agreement - The Focus Supreme Court Decision 2007Da73611 Decided March 13. 2008 -
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
This paper analyzes Korean Supreme Court's decision cases to find out the legal implications of contract deposit clauses of real estate purchase & sale agreement and legal relationship between sale & purchase agreement and contract deposit clauses in the agreement. The purpose of this study is to interpret the legal principles of contract deposit clauses of purchase & sale agreement. and to understand role of contract deposit clauses and legal principle of compensation for damage in case default arises as purchase & sale agreement is not fulfilled, to prevent legal disputes in advance. This paper adopted analytical jurisprudence for methodology, and researched based on current theories and judicial precedents and various Korean literatures Under the adopted judicial precedent case in this paper, Purchaser and Seller executed purchase & sale agreement with the contract deposit clause but without actual payment of contract deposit. At that stage before payment of contract deposit, seller unilaterally announced refusal to fulfill agreement and cancellation of agreement. As contract deposit clauses in an agreement needs substantial contract of deposit money, the clause can not be legally established without actual payment of contract deposit money. In this case, contract deposit money can not be deemed as amount with cancellation of contract or pecuniary. Sellers unilateral refusal to fulfil agreement causes default for seller. In case of seller's default, purchaser can request for compensation for damages. Whether there was damage for purchaser and the amount, if any, of damages is purchaser's burden of proof
참고문헌 (18)
- 곽윤직, "민법주해" (1999), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "채권각론" (1988), 박영사
- 곽윤직, "채권각론" (2005), 박영사
- 김동훈, "계약금의 수수에 따른 몇 가지 법률문제", pp.394~ (2001), 법원사
- 김동훈, "이행거절과 계약해제", 고시연구, (354), pp.112~ (2003), 고시연구사
- 김준호, "민법강의 신정 4판" (2005), 법문사
- 김증한, "채권각론" (1988), 박영사
- 김학동, "손해배상의 예정", 인권과 정의, (252), pp.109~ (1997), 대한변호사협회
- 김형배, "채권각론" (2001), 박영사
- 남효순, "계약금약정에 관한 몇 가지 쟁점", 서울대학교 법학, 39(2), pp.284~285 (1998), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 박병칠, "계약금포기ㆍ배액상환의 약정 및 관련문제", 민사법연구, 3, pp.108~ (1994), 대한민사법학회
- 박종두, "채권법총론" (2005), 삼영사
- 양창수, "독자적인 채무불이행 유형으로서 이행거절", 민법연구, 4, pp.144~145
- 지원림, "민법강의 제5판" (2007), 홍문사
- 지원림, "채무불이행의 유형에 관한 연구", 민사법연구, (15), pp.399~ (1997)
- 최창렬, "契約金契約에 관한 硏究", 재산법연구, 20(1), pp.53~75 (2003), 한국재산법학회
- 현승종, "로마법" (1996), 법문사
- "한국공인중개사협회"[URL]