본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

교수학생 상호작용 척도의 내적 요인구조 분석

Examining the factor structure and validation of the faculty student interaction scale

최지혜
국가데이터연구원 (Statistics Research Institute)|2016.08|통계연구 (Journal of the Korean Official Statistics)|제21권 제2호|pp. 76-94

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

validation타당도요인구조factor structure교수학생 상호작용faculty student interaction
주제분류경제학

초록

이 연구는 교수학생 상호작용 척도를 개발 및 타당화하고, 척도의 내적 요인구조를 분석하기 위한 것이다. 연구대상은 대학생 318명이다. 척도 개발과 타당화를 위해 탐색적 요인분석과 신뢰도, 상관분석을 실시하였으며, 척도의 내적 요인구조를 확인하기 위해 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과 최종 3요인, 13문항을 확정하였고, 하위요인은 학업적 상호작용, 개인적 상호작용, 일반적 상호작용으로 명명하였다. 척도의 신뢰도는 .90이며, 교수학생 상호작용 척도의 하위요인들은 서로 적절한 상관을 보이고 있었다. 척도의 내적 요인구조 확인을 위해 이론적 가정에따 라 단일차원과 다차원모델을 구성하고, 경쟁모델비교를 하였다. 적합도 분 석 결 과 , 교수학생상호작용 척도는 단일차원보다 다차원으로 해석하는 것 이 적절하였다. 이러한 연 구 결과는 본교수학생 상호작용 척도가 다차원구조로 이루어진 타당하고 신뢰로운 도구임을 시사하는 것이다 .

Abstract

This study tested the validity and internal structure of the Faculty student interaction scale. Participants were 318 university students. Psychometric evaluation included item analysis, internal consistency estimates of reliability, and construct validity. All item-total correlations were above the recommendation of .40. The internal consistency for faculty student interaction sub-scales approached adequate reliability ranging from .70 to .88. Exploratory factor analyses suggested three scales to measure faculty-student interactions: (1) academical interaction, (2) personal interaction, (3) general interaction. This study tested three confirmatory factor analytic models to provide validity evidence based on its internal structure. Results revealed that faculty student interaction consists of multidimensional structure and a bifactor model, provided the best fit to our data. The results support the utility of the faculty student interaction scale. Implications, limitations, and directions for future research are discussed.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. 김혜정, "교수-학생의 상호작용이 신체적 자기효능감 및 무용능력성취에 미치는 영향", 한국무용과학회지, (21), pp.1~17 (2010), 한국무용과학회
  2. 오경록, "무용전공대학생의 교수-학생 상호작용이 교수행동만족 및 무용능력성취에 미치는 영향", 한국체육과학회지, 20(5), pp.871~892 (2011), 한국체육과학회
  3. 조홍식, "체육수업에서 교사-학생 관계가 학생들의 학습태도에 미치는 영향", 한국체육과학회지, 17(3), pp.607~618 (2008), 한국체육과학회
  4. Anaya, G., "Latina", o student achievement: Exploring the influence of student-faculty interactions on college grades, 2001, pp.42(1), 3~14
  5. Astin, A.W., "Four Critical Years. Effects of College on Beliefs, Attitudes, and Knowledge" (1977), Jossey-Bass
  6. Astin, A.W., "What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited" (1993), Jossey-Bass
  7. Chou, C., "Formative Evaluation of Synchronous CMC Systems for a Learner-Centered Online Course", Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(2), pp.169~188 (2001)
  8. Cokley, K., "Construction and initial validation of the student-professor interaction scale", College Student Affairs Journal, 24(1), pp.32~50 (2004)
  9. Cole, D.G., "Faculty-student interactions of African American and White college students at predominently White institutions", doctor, pp.1999
  10. Davis, M., "Barriers to reflective practice: the changing nature of higher education", Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(3), pp.243~255 (2003)
  11. DeVellis, R.F., "Scale development: Theory and applications" (1991), Sage Publications, Inc
  12. Dika, S.L., "Applications of social capital in educational literature: A critical synthesis", Review of educational research, 72(1), pp.31~60 (2002)
  13. Student Assessment of Teaching and Learning(SALT)(short form), "Ellett, C.D.", College of Education, Louisiana State University, ~ (1996)
  14. Endo, J., "The Effect of Student-Faculty Interaction on Students’ Educational Outcomes", Research in Higher Education, 16(2), pp.115~138 (1982)
  15. Newby, M., "A model of the relationship between teacher and student perceptions of classroom interactions", California.(ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED454214), ~ (2001)
  16. Fraser, B.I., "Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents and consequences" (1991), Pergamon Press
  17. Fraser, B. J., "Handbook of research on science teaching and learning", pp.492~541 (1994), Macmillan
  18. Hair, J.F., "Multivanate data analysis" (1998), Prentice Hall
  19. Holzinger, K. J., "The bi-factor method", Psychometrika, 2(1), pp.41~54 (1937)
  20. Jafari, A., "Managing Courses Defining Learning:What Faculty, Students, and Administrators Want", Educause review, 41(4), pp.50~70 (2006)
  21. Kang, I., "Electronic collaborators: Learner-centered technologies for literacy, apprenticeship, and discourse" (1998), Erlbaum
  22. Kim, Y.K., "Student–faculty interaction in research universities:Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status", Research in Higher Education, 50(5), pp.437~459 (2009)
  23. Kim, Y.K., "Racially different patterns of student–faculty interaction in college: A focus on levels, effects, and causal directions", Journal of the Professoriate, 3(2), pp.161~189 (2010)
  24. Klassen, J., "Web-Based Teaching: Learning from Experience" (2003), University of Baltimore Press
  25. Kuh, G., "The Effects of Student-Faculty Interaction in the 1990s", The Review of Higher Education, 24(3), pp.309~332 (2001)
  26. Lambert, A.D., "Faculty Lend a Helping Hand to Student Success: Measuring Student-Faculty Interactions", Annual Meeting of the Association for Institutional Research (2012)
  27. Li, L., "Does It Really Matter? Using Virtual Office Hours to Enhance Student Faculty Interaction", Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), pp.175~185 (2009)
  28. Milem, J.F., "A modified model of college student persistence:Exploring the relationship between Astin’s theory of involvement and Tinto’s theory of student departure", Journal of College Student Development, 38(4), pp.387~400 (1997)
  29. Moore, M.G., "Distance education: A systems view" (1996), Wadsworth Publishing Company
  30. Murphy, K.R., "Principles, and Applications" (1988), Englewood Cliffs
  31. Netemeyer, R.G., "Scaling procedures: Issues and applications" (2003), Sage Publications
  32. "A wide range of colleges and universities show gains in effective educational practices, survey finds" (2009)[URL]
  33. Pace, C.R., "College Student Experiences Questionnaire" (1998), Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning
  34. Pascarella, E.T., "How college affects students. Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research" (1991), J ossey-Bass
  35. Pascarella, E.T., "How college affects students(Vol. 2): A third decade of research" (2005), Jossey-Bass
  36. Pascarella, E.T., "The influence of college on self-concept: A consideration of race and gender differences", American Educational Research Journal, 24(1), pp.49~77 (1987)
  37. Pascarella, E.T., "Student-faculty interactional settings and their relationship to predicted academic performance", Journal of Higher Education, 49(5), pp.450~463 (1978)
  38. Reckase, M., "Multidimensional item response theory (Vol. 150)" (2009), Springer
  39. Reise, S. P., "Bifactor models and rotations:Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores", Journal of personality assessment, 92(6), pp.544~559 (2010)
  40. Rosenthal, G., "The one to one survey: Traditional versus non-traditional student satisfaction with professors during one to one contacts", College Student Journal, 34(6), pp.315~321 (2000)
  41. Sagayadevan, V., "The role of emotional engagement in lecturerstudent interaction and the impact on academic outcomes of student achievement and learning", Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(3), pp.1~30 (2012)
  42. Schmid, J., "The development of hierarchical factor solutions", Psychometrika, 22(1), pp.53~61 (1957)
  43. Terenzini, P.T., "Twenty years of research on college students: Lessons for future research", Research in Higher Education, 32(1), pp.83~92 (1991)
  44. Umbach, P.D., "Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement", Research in Higher Education, 46(2), pp.153~184 (2005)
  45. Wubbels, H., "A comparison interpersonal behavior of Dutch and American teachers", International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, pp.1~18 (1991)

관련 논문AI추천

교수신뢰 척도 개발에 관한 예비 연구박용한, 정은이한국심리학회 · 한국심리학회지:일반2009 · 제28권 제2호학생-교수 상호작용, 학생참여, 대학교육성과의 종단 구조 관계 분석고장완, 박지회한국열린교육학회 · 열린교육연구2019 · 제27권 제2호상호작용적 학습활동과 교수와의 상호작용 및 수업의 질, 대학생활 만족 간의 관계 구조분석권성연, 신소영한국평생교육ㆍHRD연구소 · 평생교육 · HRD연구2018 · 제14권 제4호대학 수업컨설팅 분석도구 타당화 및 구성요인 간 구조적 관계 분석남민우, 박성열, 이해듬한국농·산업교육학회 · 농업교육과 인적자원개발2015 · 제47권 제1호교수-학생 상호작용 변화에 영향을 미치는 대학생 특성 및 대학 초기 경험 분석최보금한국교육개발원 · 한국교육2016 · 제43권 제1호대학생용 학습참여 행동특성 진단도구 개발권은진, 김현우, 최보라대학교육개발센터협의회 · 대학 교수-학습 연구2021 · 제14권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

한국 가계패널 자료를 이용한 소득과 소비 수렴 연구서병선, 김기환pp. 1-24제도적 환경이 기업의 CSR 국제표준 이행에 미치는영향: 유엔글로벌콤팩트(UNGC) 탈퇴 기업 중심으로차경천, 김도형pp. 25-52생활행위 구분을 고려한 가정부문 에너지소비조사기법의 적용방안임기추pp. 53-75산업연관분석을 통한 폐기물처리시설 수용력 산정: 수도권매립지를 사례로김태현, 정승현pp. 95-117온라인 패션 유통업자와 타 제품 유통업자 간 소비자보호 수준에 대한 비교 연구심수인pp. 118-145
원문 보기