본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Institutional Factors Affecting University Startup Types and Their Performances in Korean Universities: A Panel Data Analysis

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study adopts a resource-based framework to investigate the factors driving the prevalence of three types of startups in universities by faculty, students, and university organizations, and their subsequent performance indicator, such as employee count. Specifically, we formulate twelve hypotheses that link institutional resources and university infrastructure to each type of university startups and their performance. By analyzing data from 130 South Korean four-year universities spanning the years 2017 to 2021, we examine variations across six distinct university resource categories. Our findings reveal that the factors influencing different types of university startups are distinct. Research funds and universities’ personnel policies have a significant impact on professor startups, whereas startup education programs and faculty startup performance are significant student startups. In addition, both the level of financial resources and the existence of a technology-holding company exert a broad influence on all three types of university startups, albeit with a distinction in the nature funds. Research funds are correlated with faculty and student startups, whereas commercialization funds are associated with universities’ organizational startups. Nevertheless, the presence of a technology-holding company has a significant impact on all three types of university startups and their respective performances. Furthermore, the outcomes underscore a distinct contrast between the factors influencing each type of university startups and the factors influencing their respective performances. Our results provide implications for both university and government policy-makers, emphasizing the necessity for a targeted approach in policies aimed at fostering startups across faculty, students, and university organizations.

Abstract

This study adopts a resource-based framework to investigate the factors driving the prevalence of three types of startups in universities by faculty, students, and university organizations, and their subsequent performance indicator, such as employee count. Specifically, we formulate twelve hypotheses that link institutional resources and university infrastructure to each type of university startups and their performance. By analyzing data from 130 South Korean four-year universities spanning the years 2017 to 2021, we examine variations across six distinct university resource categories. Our findings reveal that the factors influencing different types of university startups are distinct. Research funds and universities’ personnel policies have a significant impact on professor startups, whereas startup education programs and faculty startup performance are significant student startups. In addition, both the level of financial resources and the existence of a technology-holding company exert a broad influence on all three types of university startups, albeit with a distinction in the nature funds. Research funds are correlated with faculty and student startups, whereas commercialization funds are associated with universities’ organizational startups. Nevertheless, the presence of a technology-holding company has a significant impact on all three types of university startups and their respective performances. Furthermore, the outcomes underscore a distinct contrast between the factors influencing each type of university startups and the factors influencing their respective performances. Our results provide implications for both university and government policy-makers, emphasizing the necessity for a targeted approach in policies aimed at fostering startups across faculty, students, and university organizations.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Ahlstrom, D., "Venture Capital in Emerging Economies : Networks and Institutional Change", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(2), pp.299~320 (2006)
  2. Åstebro, T., "Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty : Implications for university entrepreneurship policy", Research policy, 41(4), pp.663~677 (2012)
  3. Bae, T. J., "The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Intentions : A Meta–analytic Review", Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), pp.217~254 (2014)
  4. Cho, H., "An Analysis on Factors Affecting University Technology Commercialization", Intellectual Property Research, 7(3), pp.217~245 (2012)
  5. Choi, D. S., "How Does Technology Startups Increase Innovative Performance? The Study of Technology Startups on Innovation Focusing on Employment Change in Korea", Sustainability, 12(2), pp.551~570 (2020)
  6. Dahl, M. S., "The Who, Why, and How of Spinoffs", Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(3), pp.661~688 (2013)
  7. Davidsson, P., "The Role of Social and Human Capital Among Nascent Entrepreneurs", Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), pp.301~331 (2003)
  8. Dickson, P. H., "Entrepreneurial Selection and Success : Does Education Matter?", Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), pp.239~258 (2008)
  9. Di Gregorio, D., "Why Do Some Universities Generate More Start-ups Than Others?", Research Policy, 32(2), pp.209~227 (2003)
  10. Douglas, E., "Self-employment As a Career Choice : Attitudes, Entrepreneurial Intentions, and Utility Maximization", Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 26, pp.81~90 (2002)
  11. Etzkowitz, H., "The Norms of Entrepreneurial Science : Cognitive Effects of the New University-industry Linkage", Research Policy, 27(8), pp.823~833 (1998)
  12. Friedmand, J., "University Technology Transfer : Do Incentives, Management, and Location Matter?", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), pp.17~30 (2003)
  13. Demand vs. Supply Driven Innovations: US and Swedish Experiences in Academic Entrepreneurship, "Goldfarb, B.", SSE, 2001, SSE[DOI]
  14. Grimaldi, R., "30 Years After Bayh–Dole : Reassessing Academic Entrepreneurship", Research Policy, 40(8), pp.1045~1057 (2011)
  15. Hasegawa, K., "Characteristics of University Startups in Japan", IEEE Technology &Engineering Management Conference (TEMSCON), pp.67~72 (2017), IEEE
  16. Henrekson, M., "Designing Efficient Institutions for Science-based Entrepreneurship : Lesson from the US and Sweden", The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), pp.207~231 (2001)
  17. 홍효석, "창업교육과 창업동아리 경험이 청년창업에 미치는 영향", 벤처창업연구, 8(2), pp.141~151 (2013), 한국벤처창업학회[DOI]
  18. Challenges to Technology Transfer: A Literature Review of the Constraints on Environmental Technology Dissemination, "Johnson, D. K.", ~ (2009)
  19. Khurana, R., "Career Experiences and Firm Foundings", ~ (2000)
  20. 김용정, "대학의 지식재산 기반 창업활동에 관한 요인분석 - 국내 대학의 지식재산(특허)을 중심으로 -", 지식재산연구, 11(1), pp.163~196 (2016), 한국지식재산연구원[DOI]
  21. Levin, S. G., "Research Productivity Over the Life Cycle: Evidence for Academic Scientists", The American Economic Review, pp.114~132 (1991)
  22. Lockett, A., "The Development of the Resource-based View of the Firm : A Critical Appraisal", International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(1), pp.9~28 (2009)
  23. Lockett, A., "Resources, Capabilities, Risk Capital and the Creation of University Spin-out Companies", Research Policy, 34(7), pp.1043~1057 (2005)
  24. Lowe, R. A., "Who Develops a University Invention? The Impact of Tacit Knowledge and Licensing Policies", Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), pp.415~429 (2006)
  25. Newbert, S. L., "Empirical Research on the Resource-based View of the Firm : An Assessment and Suggestions for Future Research", Strategic Management Journal, 28(2), pp.121~146 (2007)
  26. O'shea, R. P., "Entrepreneurial Orientation, Technology Transfer and Spinoff Performance of US Universities", Research Policy, 34(7), pp.994~1009 (2005)
  27. Roberts, E. B, "Entrepreneurs in High Technology: Lessons from MIT and Beyond" (1991), Oxford University Press
  28. Roche, M. P., "Different Founders, Different Venture Outcomes : A Comparative Analysis of Academic and Non-academic Startups", Research Policy, 49(10), pp.104062~ (2020)
  29. Shane, S., "Technological Opportunities and New Firm Creation", Management Science, 47(2), pp.205~220 (2001)
  30. Shane, S., "Organizational Endowments and the Performance of University Start-ups", Management Science, 48(1), pp.154~170 (2002)
  31. Showalter, D., "University Startup Intensity and Faculty Quality", Economic Inquiry, 57(2), pp.855~875 (2019)
  32. Son, H., "How Can University Technology Holding Companies Bridge the Valley of Death? Evidence from Korea", Technovation, 109, pp.102158~ (2022)
  33. Vesper, K. H., "Measuring Progress in Entrepreneurship Education", Journal of Business Venturing, 12(5), pp.403~421 (1997)
  34. Wernerfelt, B., "A Resource-based View of the Firm", Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), pp.171~180 (1984)
  35. Zucker, L. G., "Geographically Localized Knowledge : Spillovers or Markets?", Economic Inquiry, 36(1), pp.65~86 (1998)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)