Scope of the KOREAN School Violence Prevention LAW
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In Korea, suicide was caused by school violence and it became a social problem. The school violence prevention law was enacted to allow students to take action on school violence victims, protect students from harm, and resolve disputes between them. The existing system of school violence was able to regulate school violence, but the Act on the Prevention of School Violence was enacted to more effectively protect the victims and prevent school violence. According to the Act on the Prevention of School Violence, each school has its own organization called the Autonomy Committee. Self-governing committees usually conduct school violence prevention activities. In the event of school violence, students should take a neutral standpoint and take initiative measures, protect victims, and make dispute resolution. This is an institution to resolve school violence on its own within the school. However, school violence is a criminal offense, and there is controversy over handling school violence within the school. Especially, there is controversy about the scope of the school violence prevention law. In this paper, the main contents of the school violence prevention law are reviewed and the scope of the school violence prevention law is clarified as follows. First, it is the coverage area. According to the School Violence Prevention Act, school violence is violence in and out of school. In other words, it is because school violence can occur not only in the educational activities outside the school but also on the way to and from school. Therefore, it is necessary to interpret it widely based on the relation with the school. Second, it is human scope. The School Violence Prevention Act stipulates that school violence is a "student-directed" act. If the victim is a student, the law must apply regardless of whether the perpetrator is a student or not. Third, it is the action to be applied. In the school violence prevention law, school violence uses the notion of criminal law, such as injury and assault, and it should be interpreted independently in judging it, but it should be interpreted same as the concept of criminal law to prevent unified interpretation and confusion.
Abstract
In Korea, suicide was caused by school violence and it became a social problem. The school violence prevention law was enacted to allow students to take action on school violence victims, protect students from harm, and resolve disputes between them. The existing system of school violence was able to regulate school violence, but the Act on the Prevention of School Violence was enacted to more effectively protect the victims and prevent school violence. According to the Act on the Prevention of School Violence, each school has its own organization called the Autonomy Committee. Self-governing committees usually conduct school violence prevention activities. In the event of school violence, students should take a neutral standpoint and take initiative measures, protect victims, and make dispute resolution. This is an institution to resolve school violence on its own within the school. However, school violence is a criminal offense, and there is controversy over handling school violence within the school. Especially, there is controversy about the scope of the school violence prevention law. In this paper, the main contents of the school violence prevention law are reviewed and the scope of the school violence prevention law is clarified as follows. First, it is the coverage area. According to the School Violence Prevention Act, school violence is violence in and out of school. In other words, it is because school violence can occur not only in the educational activities outside the school but also on the way to and from school. Therefore, it is necessary to interpret it widely based on the relation with the school. Second, it is human scope. The School Violence Prevention Act stipulates that school violence is a "student-directed" act. If the victim is a student, the law must apply regardless of whether the perpetrator is a student or not. Third, it is the action to be applied. In the school violence prevention law, school violence uses the notion of criminal law, such as injury and assault, and it should be interpreted independently in judging it, but it should be interpreted same as the concept of criminal law to prevent unified interpretation and confusion.
참고문헌 (13)
- Kim LJ, "Study on Law Related to Prevention of School Violation", Doctoral, pp.2013
- 홍석한, "학교폭력 예방의 헌법적 의미와 학교폭력예방법상 예방교육에 대한 고찰", 법과정책, 22(1), pp.219~247 (2016), 법과정책연구원[DOI]
- 이현정, "학교폭력 처리절차의 문제점과 개선방안 ― 「가해학생 조치별 세부기준 고시」를 중심으로 ―", 미국헌법연구, 28(3), pp.215~251 (2017), 미국헌법학회
- 하윤수, "「학교폭력예방법」의 문제점과 개선 방안", 동아법학, (78), pp.405~429 (2018), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 이승현, "「학교폭력 예방 및 대책에 관한 법률」의 개정내용 및 개선방안", 형사정책연구, 23(2), pp.157~190 (2012), 한국형사법무정책연구원[DOI]
- 김갑석, "학교폭력개념의 법적정립을 통한 학교폭력 대응방안", 유럽헌법연구, (18), pp.311~341 (2015), 유럽헌법학회
- 권오걸, "학교폭력예방 및 대책에 관한 법률의 적용과 문제점", 법학논고, (43), pp.79~102 (2013), 법학연구원[DOI]
- 김성태, "학교폭력예방법에 대한 고찰 - 법적용 실제에 있어서의 문제를 중심으로 -", 홍익법학, 16(3), pp.611~636 (2015), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 도중진, "학교폭력의 분쟁조정과 회복적 사법 - 학교폭력예방 및 대책에 관한 법률 및 시행령상의 분쟁조정제도의 실효적 개선방안을 중심으로 -", 형사법의 신동향, (35), pp.52~90 (2012), 대검찰청[DOI]
- 신강숙, "행정심판 사례를 통하여 본 학교폭력예방법 고찰", 강원법학, 41, pp.647~686 (2014), 비교법학연구소[DOI]
- 김혜경, "학교폭력에 대한 형사법적 접근의 제한 : 학교폭력 예방 및 대책에 관한 법률의 조정법적 성격을 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 24(4), pp.257~293 (2013), 한국형사법무정책연구원
- 이성기, "학교폭력에 대한 법 제도적 개선방안 - 회복적 사법 이념을 반영한 학생규칙 제정을 중심으로 -", 외법논집, 41(3), pp.221~242 (2017), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 강지명, "학교폭력 대응정책에서 소년사법의 역할에 관한 연구", 성균관법학, 26(3), pp.249~275 (2014), 법학연구원[DOI]
