학교용 감각처리 평가도구 개발을 위한 작업치료사 욕구 조사
Occupational Therapist Needs Survey for the Development of a Sensory Processing Evaluation Tool for Schools
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
목적 : 본 연구는 국내 아동 작업치료사를 대상으로 학교에서의 감각처리 수행을 알아보기 위한 기존 평가방법과 기존 평가를 실시하는데 있어 한계점을 알아보고, 학교용 감각처리 평가도구 개발 필요성에 대한욕구를 조사하여 새로운 평가도구 개발의 기초 자료를 제공하기 위한 것이다. 연구방법 : 학령기 아동의 작업치료 중재 경험이 3년 이상인 작업치료사 20명으로 대상으로 설문조사를 실시 하였다. 설문조사는 온라인 설문조사와 전화면접을 통해 정보를 얻었다. 설문 내용은 일반적인 특성과 기존의 학교에서의 감각처리 평가 방법 및 한계점, 학교용 감각처리 평가도구의 필요성과 학교용 감각처리 평가도구 개발에 대한 의견 조사로 나누어 폐쇄형 질문은 12문항, 개방형 질문은 4문항으로 구성되었다. 결과 : 연구 대상자의 90%가 학령기 아동의 학교에서의 수행 정도를 부모나 아동을 통해‘약간의 정보’를 파 악하고 있다고 하였으며, 학교생활에서 감각처리와 관련 된 어려움에 대한 호소를 경험한 것은 ‘종종’이50%, ‘보통정도’이상이 50%로 나타났다. 학교용 감각처리 평가도구 개발 필요성은‘상당히 필요함’이상이 80%로 조사되었다. 결론 : 국내 아동을 담당하는 작업치료사들은 학교에서의 감각처리 능력을 파악하기 위한 평가도구 개발 필요성에 대한 욕구를 가지고 있으며, 평가도구 개발을 통해 학령기 아동의 작업치료 평가 및 중재에 중요한역할을 할 것으로 판단하고 있다.
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate existing evaluation methods and the limitations thereof Korean children’s occupational therapists to understand sensory processing performance in schools. This study provides basic data for the development of sensory processing evaluation tools for schools. Methods: The questionnaire was administered to 20 occupational therapists with more than 3 years of experience in occupational therapy interventions for school-aged children. The survey obtained information through online surveys and telephone interviews. The questionnaires were divided into general characteristics and evaluation methods and limitations of existing sensory processing in school, necessity of a sensory processing evaluation tool for school, and opinions. The questionnaire consisted of 12 closed questions and 4 open questions. Results: In total, 90% of the researchers said that school-aged children in schools are aware of 'some information' through their parents or children. Furthermore, 50% said they often complained about difficulties related to sensory processing in school, and 50% that they were more than 'usual'. Finally, 80% of the repondents indicated that the development of sensory processing evaluation tools for schools was “significantly needed”. Conclusion: Occupational therapists in charge of domestic children reported for the need to develop evaluation tools to understand sensory processing abilities in schools. Evaluation tools will play an important role in the evaluation and intervention of occupational therapy for school-aged children.
참고문헌 (22)
- Ayres, A. J., "Sensory integration and the child" (1979), Western Psychological Services
- Ashburner, J., "Sensory processing and classroom emotional, behavioral, and educational outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(5), pp.564~573 (2008)
- Ben-Sasson, A., "Sensory over-responsivity in elementary school : Prevalence and social-emotional correlates", Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37(5), pp.705~716 (2009)[DOI]
- Bundy, A. C., "Sensory integration : Theory and practice" (2002), F. A. Davis
- Bundy, A. C., "How does sensory processing dysfunction affect play?", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), pp.201~208 (2007)[DOI]
- Case-Smith, J., "Occupational therapy for children and adolescents" (2015), Elsevier
- Chan, C., "An integrative review of school-based mental health interventions for elementary students : Implications for occupational therapy", Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 33(1), pp.81~101 (2017)[DOI]
- Dunn, W., "The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of young children and their families : A conceptual model", Infants and Young Children, 9(4), pp.23~35 (1997)
- Dunn, W., "Sensory profile user’s manual" (1999), Therapy Skill Builders
- Dunn, W., "Sensory profile 2 user’s manual" (2014), Therapy Skill Builders
- Heo, M. Y., "A study of how to support school-aged children's undesirable behavior in class", Children's Foundation Research Collection, 2013, pp.174~219 (2013)[DOI]
- Humphry, R., "Young children’s occupations : Explicating the dynamics of developmental processes", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(2), pp.171~179 (2002)[DOI]
- 전상신, "일반아동과 장애아동의 초등학교 전이 시 성공적인 학교적응에 필요한 기술: 일반교사의 인식을 중심으로", 유아특수교육연구, 7(1), pp.1~20 (2007), 한국유아특수교육학회
- Kim, E. Y., "The effects of sensory integration group program on praxis and socialization for school-aged children with sensory integration dysfunction", Journal Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 7(2), pp.37~47 (2009)
- Kim, K. M., "The literature review for assessment of sensory integration", Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 11(1), pp.93~98 (2003)
- 김소연, "국제기능장애 건강분류(ICF)에 따른 한국 아동작업치료 연구동향 분석: 대한작업치료학회지를 중심으로", 대한작업치료학회지, 24(4), pp.161~174 (2016), 대한작업치료학회
- Kinnealey, M., "A phenomenological study of sensory defensiveness in adults", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 49(5), pp.444~451 (1995)[DOI]
- Lane, S. J., "Sensory over-responsivity and ADHD : Differentiating using electrodermal responses, cortisol, and anxiety", Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 4(8), pp.1~11 (2010)[DOI]
- Miller Kuhaneck, H., "Development of the classroom sensory environment assessment(CSEA)", American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(6), pp.1~9 (2015)[DOI]
- Parham, L. D., "Sensory Processing Measure(SPM) manual" (2007), Western Psychological Services
- Reynold, S., "A pilot study examining activity participation, sensory responsiveness, and competence in children with high functioning autism spectrum disorder", Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41(11), pp.1496~1506 (2011)[DOI]
- Yoo, J. E., "Validity and reliability of the sensory processing measure-main classroom form in Korea", 석사, pp.2012