Investigation of Optimal Cement Space in 3D Printed 3-unit Resin Prosthesis: A Pilot Study
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the optimal cement space in the 3D printed 3-unit resin fixed partial denture. Materials and Methods: A model was fabricated for mandibular premolar and molar implant abutments. Forty resin prostheses were fabricated using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printer. A cement space of 90 μm (CS 90) was given for 20 specimens and a cement space of 100 μm (CS 100) was given for 20 specimens. The groups of each cement space were divided into 10 groups by a layer thickness (50 μm and 100 μm) and a build orientation (0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°). The prostheses were seated and scanned with micro-CT. Marginal, axial and occlusal gaps were measured and statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test (α = .05). Results: In CS 90 groups, marginal gap (MG) value was 88.43 ± 41.77 μm, mid axial gap (AX) value was 92.74 ± 58.43 μm, axio-occlusal angle gap (AN) value was 80.49 ± 56.97 μm and occlusal gap (OC) value was 166.75 ± 52.38 μm. In CS 100 groups, MG value was 69.12 ± 40.17 μm, AX value was 113.43 ± 64.20 μm, AN value was 92.99 ± 55.73 μm and OC value was 161.79 ± 50.40 μm. In CS 100 group, MG showed smaller value in comparison to CS 90 group (p < .05). Conclusion: For the SLA 3D printed 3-unit resin fixed partial denture, setting the cement space to 90 μm or less is not recommended due to the interference in seating.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the optimal cement space in the 3D printed 3-unit resin fixed partial denture. Materials and Methods: A model was fabricated for mandibular premolar and molar implant abutments. Forty resin prostheses were fabricated using stereolithography (SLA) 3D printer. A cement space of 90 μm (CS 90) was given for 20 specimens and a cement space of 100 μm (CS 100) was given for 20 specimens. The groups of each cement space were divided into 10 groups by a layer thickness (50 μm and 100 μm) and a build orientation (0°, 30°, 45°, 60° and 90°). The prostheses were seated and scanned with micro-CT. Marginal, axial and occlusal gaps were measured and statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test (α = .05). Results: In CS 90 groups, marginal gap (MG) value was 88.43 ± 41.77 μm, mid axial gap (AX) value was 92.74 ± 58.43 μm, axio-occlusal angle gap (AN) value was 80.49 ± 56.97 μm and occlusal gap (OC) value was 166.75 ± 52.38 μm. In CS 100 groups, MG value was 69.12 ± 40.17 μm, AX value was 113.43 ± 64.20 μm, AN value was 92.99 ± 55.73 μm and OC value was 161.79 ± 50.40 μm. In CS 100 group, MG showed smaller value in comparison to CS 90 group (p < .05). Conclusion: For the SLA 3D printed 3-unit resin fixed partial denture, setting the cement space to 90 μm or less is not recommended due to the interference in seating.
참고문헌 (23)
- Beuer F, "Digital dentistry : an overview of recent developments for CAD", CAM generated restorations, 2008, pp.204, 505~511
- Duret F, "CAD-CAM in dentistry", J Am Dent Assoc, 117, pp.715~720 (1988)
- Atzeni E, "Economics of additive manufacturing for end-usable metal parts", Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 62, pp.1147~1155 (2012)
- Van Noort R, "The future of dental devices is digital", Dent Mater, 28, pp.3~12 (2012)
- Stansbury JW, "3D printing with polymers : Challenges among expanding options and opportunities", Dent Mater, 32, pp.54~64 (2016)
- Silva NR, "Additive CAD", CAM process for dental prostheses, 2011, pp.20, 93~96
- Dawood A, "3D printing in dentistry", Br Dent J, 219, pp.521~529 (2015)
- Jasveer S, "Comparison of different types of 3D printing technologies", Int J Sci Res, 8, pp.1~9 (2018)
- Xing H, "Study on surface quality, precision and mechanical properties of 3D printed ZrO2 ceramic components by laser scanning stereolithography", Ceram Int, 43, pp.16340~16347 (2017)
- Calderon PS, "Technical complications with implant-supported dental prostheses", J Oral Sci, 56, pp.179~184 (2014)
- Park GS, "Effects of Printing Parameters on the Fit of Implant-Supported 3D Printing Resin Prosthetics", Materials(Basel), 12, pp.E2533~ (2019)
- Mai H, "Fit of interim crowns fabricated using photopolymer-jetting 3D printing", J Prosthet Dent, 118, pp.208~215 (2017)
- Alharbi N, "Three-dimensional evaluation of marginal and internal fit of 3D-printed interim restorations fabricated on different finish line designs", J Prosthodont Res, 62, pp.218~226 (2018)
- Contrepois M, "Marginal adaptation of ceramic crowns : A systematic review", J Prosthet Dent, 110, pp.447~454 (2013)
- Brand RW, "Anatomy of Orofacial Structures: A Comprehensive Approach", pp.421~ (2014), Mosby
- Goodacre CJ, "Tooth preparations for complete crowns : an art form based on scientific principles", J Prosthet Dent, 85, pp.363~376 (2001)
- Assif D, "The flow of zinc phosphate cement under a full-coverage restoration and its effect on marginal adaptation according to the location of cement application", Quintessence Int, 18, pp.765~774 (1987)
- Pelekanos S, "Micro-CT evaluation of the marginal fit of different In-Ceram alumina copings", Eur J Esthet Dent, 4, pp.278~292 (2009)
- Laurent M, "Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns : validation of the silicone replica method", J Oral Rehabil, 35, pp.116~122 (2008)
- Borba M, "Adaptation of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures", Dent Mater, 27, pp.1119~1126 (2011)
- Petteno D, "Comparison of marginal fit of 3 different metal-ceramic systems : An in vitro study", Int J Prosthodont, 13, pp.405~408 (2000)
- Wang WL, "Influence of process parameters on stereolithography part shrinkage", Mater Des, 17, pp.205~213 (1996)
- Huang Q, "Optimal offline compensation of shape shrinkage for three-dimensional printing processes", Iie transactions, 47, pp.431~441 (2015)