본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기술집약형 중소기업의 기술사업화 지원정책 연구: 대덕연구개발특구의 사례

A Study on the Technology Commercialization Policy for Technology-based SMEs: Case on Daedeok Innopolis

김경근|황혜란|정형권
한국벤처창업학회 (The Korean Society of Business Venturing)|2013.09|벤처창업연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship)|제8권 제3호|pp. 39-52|DOI 10.16972/apjbve.8.3.201309.39

2

조회

0

다운로드

15

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

기술사업화innovation policy혁신정책Technology commercialization대덕연구개발특구기술집약형 중소기업technology-intensive SMEsDaeduk Innopolis

초록

기술집약형 중소기업의 기술사업화 활동은 초기 기술을 대상으로 사업화를 전개하는 경우가 많기 때문에 기술 및 시장 위험도가 상대적으로 높다. 따라서 개별 기업의 역량이나 전략만으로 설명되기 보다는 혁신시스템적 관점에서 파악할 때 실효성 있는 정책 방안을 제시할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 기술집약형 중소기업이 집적되어 있는 대덕연구개발특구 지역을 중심으로 이들 기업의 기술사업화 행태와 혁신시스템의 분석을 통해 그 특성을 밝히고 이러한 특성을 고려한 기술사업화 지원정책 방향을 도출하고자 하였다. 특히 현재 대덕연구개발특구의 기술사업화 시스템의 한계와 문제점을 국가수준과 지역 수준에서의 혁신시스템 전환기에 나타나는‘시스템 전환 지체’로 파악하고, 이러한 시스템 실패 극복을 위한 정책방향과 과제를 제안하였다.

Abstract

The main characteristic of technology commercialization by technology–intensive SMEs is that its success is highly uncertain due to the low maturities of their technology and market. Therefore, in order to find out more effective policy, it is essential to understand the technology commercialization in terms of the institutional support system including innovation policy, rather than an individual firm’s strategy. Focusing on the Daeduk Innopolis, where many technology-intensive firms agglomerate, this paper explores SMEs' behavior for technology commercialization and the innovation system in the regional level. Then it points out the limitations and problems of the technology commercialization system in Daeduk innopolis, which might be closely related to the ‘system failure’ in the transition period. Based on the results of this innovation system approach, this paper also suggests some policy directions and agendas for overcoming those system failures in technology commercialization.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Bacaria, J., "The Catalan innovation system: Governing rapid changes, In Regional innovation systems: the role of governances in a globalized world", pp.72~98 (1988), UCL Press
  2. Casper, S., "Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms : a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK", Research Policy, 33(1), pp.89~106 (2004)
  3. The policy direction for efficiency of regional R&D, "Cha, D. W.", KISTEP, ~, pp.Issue Paper.2011-03 (2011)
  4. Choi, S. H., "The analysis of Daeduk R&D special zone from the perspective of evolutionary theory" (2008), Korea Academic Information
  5. Cooke, P., "The new wave of regional innovation networks : Analysis, characteristics and strategy", Small Business Economics, 8(2), pp.159~171 (1996)
  6. Cooke, P., "Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation : Exploring Globalisation 2’-A new model of industry organization", Research Policy, 34(8), pp.1128~1149 (2005)
  7. Survey on Innovation activities of Firms in Daeduk Innopolis, "Daejeon Development Institute", Daejeon Development Institute, ~, pp.Pub. No. 2012-01 (2012)
  8. "Spin-off Venture Firms from ETRI" (2012)[URL]
  9. Freeman, C., "The Economics of Industrial Innovation" (1982), Frances Pinter
  10. 2010 R&D Special Zone Statistical Survey, "Innopolis Foundation", Innopolis Foundation, ~, pp.Pub. No. 2010-06 (2011)
  11. Buidling a Creative and Cooperative National Innovation System, "Kim, G. S.", Science & Technology Policy Institute, ~, pp.Pub. No. 2002-14 (2002)
  12. Kim, Y. B., "Types of Korean Ventures : An Empirical Analysis on Ventures Designated by Korean Government", Strategic Management Studies, 3(1), pp.25~60 (2000)
  13. Kim, Y. B., "The Characteristics and Performance of Innovative SMEs by its Type", Small Business Studies, 14(2), pp.29~63 (1992)
  14. Analysis of Korean Regional Innovation Systems’ Characteristics and Policy Implications, "Kim, H. J.", Science & Technology Policy Institute, ~, pp.Pub. No. 2008-19 (2008)
  15. A Survey and Analysis of National R&D Program for Technology Commercialization, "KISTEP", Innopolis Foundation, ~, pp.Pub. No. 2006-03 (2006)
  16. Kline, S., "An Overview of Innovation, In Positive Sum Strategy" (1986), National Academy Press
  17. Ko, Y. J., "An proposal for establishing commercialization system of public sector technology", Science and Technology Policy, 18(4), pp.76~93 (2008)
  18. Korean Venture Capital Association, "2011 KVCA Yearbook" (2011), KVCA
  19. 권경섭, "국가연구개발기관 기술사업화 종합지원사업 성공요인에 관한 탐색적 연구 -세라믹히든챔피언사업을 중심으로-", 벤처창업연구, 7(1), pp.225~232 (2012), 한국벤처창업학회
  20. Laranja, M., "Policies for science, technology and innovation : Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting", Research Policy, 37(5), pp.823~835 (2008)
  21. Formulation of Comprehensive Policy Framework, "Lee, Y. S.", STEPI, ~, pp.Pub. No. 2005-04 (2005)
  22. An analysis for success factors of technology transfer : From GRIs perspective, "Lim, C. Y.", STEPI, ~, pp.Pub. No. 2007-05 (2007)
  23. Little, A. D., "New technology-based firms in the United Kingdom and the Federal Republic of Germany" (1977), Wilton House
  24. Lundvall, B. A., "Why study national systems and national styles of innovation", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(4), pp.403~422 (1998)
  25. Public Policy and Industrial Dynamics : An Evolutionary Perspective, ISE Report Project: Systems of Innovation Research Program, "Malerba, F.", Department of Technology and Social Change, ~ (1998)
  26. Malerba F., "Sectoral systems of innovation and production", Research Policy, 31(2), pp.247~264 (2002)
  27. Metcalfe, J. S., "System Failure and the Case for Innovation Policy, In Innovation Policy in Knowledge Based Economy" (2005), Springer
  28. Yearbook of survey and analysis of technology commercialization, "MKE·KIAT·KIIP", KIIP, ~, pp.Pub. No. 11522 (2010)
  29. Mowery, D., "Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  30. The Analysis Paper of National R&D Program, "NSTC·KISTEP", National Science & Technology Council, ~, pp.Pub. No. 11-1191000-000001-10 (2011)
  31. "R&D investment by region" (2012)[URL]
  32. The Trend and Agenda for Technology Commercialization in Korea, "Park, J. B.", Korean Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade, ~, pp.Issue Paper. No. 2008-233 (2008)
  33. Policies for strengthening competitiveness through management of smart human resources in Daejeon, "Park, N. D.", Daejeon Development Institute, ~, pp.Pub. No. 2012-02 (2012)
  34. An Promotion Policy for Technology Commercialization of Daeduk Research Park, "Park, T. Y.", ETRI, ~, pp.Pub. No. 2004-01 (2004)
  35. System Approaches to Innovation : Some Policy Issues, ISE Report Project: Systems of Innovation Research Program, "Smith, K.", Department of Technology and Social Change, ~ (1998)
  36. A Study on the constructing of new innovation system, "Song, W. C.", The Presidential Committee for Policy Planning, ~, pp.Report No. GOVP1200502872 (2004)
  37. "Number of venture firms by region, Retrieved from" (2012)[URL]
  38. Woolthius, R. K., "A System Failure Framework for Innovation Policy Design", Technovation, 25(6), pp.609~619 (2005)
  39. 양수희, "기술창업기업의 기업가 역량과 기술사업화 능력이 경영성과에 미치는 영향", 벤처창업연구, 6(4), pp.195~213 (2011), 한국벤처창업학회

관련 논문AI추천

국내 중소기업발(發) 기술사업화의 특성 분석과 촉진을 위한 정책방안: 성공과제와 실패과제간 비교를 중심으로박종복, 안승구한국혁신학회 · 한국혁신학회지2020 · 제15권 제5호연구개발특구 연구소기업 설립 활성화를 위한 기술이전․기술사업화 정책요인에 관한 연구 - 전북지역 정부 출연(연) 공공기술 활용을 중심으로 -임진호한국자치행정학회 · 한국자치행정학보2019 · 제33권 제3호대덕연구개발특구 중소․벤처기업의 연구개발 현황 및 기술수요 조사연구이경휘, 정지복산업개발연구소 · 산업혁신연구2008 · 제24권 제3호우리나라 중소기업 R&D 지원 실태와 개선 방안이병헌신용보증기금 · 중소기업금융연구2016 · 제36권 제4호중소벤처기업 기술사업화 영향요인 사례연구김경환, 염정원, 홍세영한국기업경영학회 · 기업경영연구2021 · 제28권 제2호중소기업에 대한 공공기술이전사업화 활성화 방안의 수립: 기술공급자, 기술수요자, 정책적 관점의 비교이민규, 한수은한국혁신학회 · 한국혁신학회지2019 · 제14권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)

중견기업의 기술획득전략이 성과에 미치는 영향현용수, 이진식, 이병헌pp. 1-16The Globalization of Korean Economy and its Impacton Small and Medium-Sized Entrepreneurial Firms from 1998 to 2007박정민, 이재은, 최순규pp. 17-26창조형창업 활성화를 위한 엔젤투자역량 겸비 창업 Facilitators 양성방안 연구변영조, 황보윤, 양영석pp. 27-37라이프스타일과 커피소비동기에 관한 연구정자영, 김광진pp. 53-65우세분석과 회귀분석을 통한 창업지원서비스 만족도 영향요인들의 상대적 중요도 비교변충규, 하환호pp. 67-76
원문 보기