본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

PERCEPTIONS OF THE TEN DIAGRAMS ON SAGE LEARNING IN THE CHOSŎN ERA: FOCUSING ON TRENDS IN ITS DISSEMINATION, DEEPENING AND DIFFUSION

이동건
한국학연구원 (Academia Koreana)|2011.06|Acta Koreana|제14권 제1호|pp. 229-265|DOI 10.18399/acta.2011.14.1.011

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

disseminationdiffusiondeepeningTen Diagrams on Sage LearningT’oegye Yi Hwang
주제분류기타인문학

초록

This study analyzes how the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (聖學十圖, sŏnghak sipto) (1568) written by T’oegye Yi Hwang (1501–1570) was disseminated and diffused amongst future generations of kings and Confucian scholars (16th–20th centuries). It also examines the characteristics of the perceptions of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (聖學十圖, Sŏnghak sipto) that existed during the Chosŏn era. What’s more, based on a perusal in a chronological manner of related materials, this study reviews the characteristics of the dissemination of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning amongst the kings of Chosŏn; moreover, the annotations of Confucian scholars who emerged after Yi Hwang are used to analyze trends in terms of the diffusion of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning. Such an exercise is designed to analyze the characteristics of the perceptions of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning during the Chosŏn era from a diachronic standpoint. Based on this analysis of the characteristics of the dissemination of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning during the 16th–20th centuries, as well as trends in the annotation thereof, the perceptions of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning during the Chosŏn era can be summarized as follows. First, in its capacity as materials for the learning of monarchs (chewanghak) and of ideological significance of state administration, the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning can be said to have a great influence on Chosŏn. One can see that it served as the standard model for the learning of monarchs in Chosŏn. Second,the trends in the diffusion and annotation of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning greatly influenced the course of the development and theoretical deepening of Neo-Confucianism (Zhu Xi’s School of Thought). The annotations of “The Mind Combines and Governs Nature and Emotions” (心統性情圖, Simt’ong sŏngjŏng to) Chapter of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning produced during the 17th century revolved around discussions about the differences between Yi Hwang and Yi Yi over the Theory of Mind and Nature (心性論, simsŏngnon), discussions which greatly influenced the deepening of the Theory of Mind and Nature during the development process of Neo-Confucianism. Meanwhile, reverence (敬, kyŏng) and simsŏngnon-related annotations of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning were actively carried out during the 19th century. This trend in terms of the annotation of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning can be considered as an example of the theoretical enrichment which the simsŏngnon-based standpoint and kyŏng-centered structure of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning introduced in terms of the deepening of the importance of kyŏng and the simsŏngnon in the subsequent development of Neo-Confucianism in Chosŏn. Third, we can see that Yi Hwang’s thought, which served as the foundation for their own thought, influenced the Silhak (Practical learning) scholars of Chosŏn.

Abstract

This study analyzes how the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (聖學十圖, sŏnghak sipto) (1568) written by T’oegye Yi Hwang (1501–1570) was disseminated and diffused amongst future generations of kings and Confucian scholars (16th–20th centuries). It also examines the characteristics of the perceptions of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (聖學十圖, Sŏnghak sipto) that existed during the Chosŏn era. What’s more, based on a perusal in a chronological manner of related materials, this study reviews the characteristics of the dissemination of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning amongst the kings of Chosŏn; moreover, the annotations of Confucian scholars who emerged after Yi Hwang are used to analyze trends in terms of the diffusion of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning. Such an exercise is designed to analyze the characteristics of the perceptions of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning during the Chosŏn era from a diachronic standpoint. Based on this analysis of the characteristics of the dissemination of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning during the 16th–20th centuries, as well as trends in the annotation thereof, the perceptions of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning during the Chosŏn era can be summarized as follows. First, in its capacity as materials for the learning of monarchs (chewanghak) and of ideological significance of state administration, the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning can be said to have a great influence on Chosŏn. One can see that it served as the standard model for the learning of monarchs in Chosŏn. Second,the trends in the diffusion and annotation of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning greatly influenced the course of the development and theoretical deepening of Neo-Confucianism (Zhu Xi’s School of Thought). The annotations of “The Mind Combines and Governs Nature and Emotions” (心統性情圖, Simt’ong sŏngjŏng to) Chapter of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning produced during the 17th century revolved around discussions about the differences between Yi Hwang and Yi Yi over the Theory of Mind and Nature (心性論, simsŏngnon), discussions which greatly influenced the deepening of the Theory of Mind and Nature during the development process of Neo-Confucianism. Meanwhile, reverence (敬, kyŏng) and simsŏngnon-related annotations of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning were actively carried out during the 19th century. This trend in terms of the annotation of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning can be considered as an example of the theoretical enrichment which the simsŏngnon-based standpoint and kyŏng-centered structure of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning introduced in terms of the deepening of the importance of kyŏng and the simsŏngnon in the subsequent development of Neo-Confucianism in Chosŏn. Third, we can see that Yi Hwang’s thought, which served as the foundation for their own thought, influenced the Silhak (Practical learning) scholars of Chosŏn.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Chŏng Manjo, "Private Academies of Korea and their Academic Roots (Han’guk ŭi sŏwŏnkwa hangmaek yŏn’gu)" (2002), Kookhak Community Corp
  2. Ch’ae Musong, "Comparative Study of T’oegye and Yulgok (T’oegye Yulgok ch’ŏlhak ŭi pigyoyŏn΄gu)" (1995), Sungkyunkwan University Press
  3. Ch’oe Chaemok, "Easy Reading of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (Swipkeingnŭn T’oegye ŭi Sŏnghak sipto)" (2004), Yemun seowon
  4. Korean Association for Studies of Philosophical Thought, "Korean Confucianism asViewed through Diagrams (Tosŏl ro ponŭn Han’guk yuhak)" (2000), Yemun seowon
  5. Han Tŏkung, "T’oegye’s Psychology: a personality and socio-psychological approach (T’oegyesimnihak: sŏnggyŏk mit sahoe simnihak chŏk chŏpkŭn)" (1994), Sungkyunkwan University Press
  6. Hŏ Kwŏnsu, "Hŏ Yu’s Learning and Thought (Husan hŏ yuŭi hangmun’gwa sasang)" (2007), Suli
  7. Hŏ Yu, "Appendix to the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (Sŏnghak sipto purok)" (1964), Husan sŏdang
  8. Kalton, Michael C, "To Become A Sage" (1988), Columbia University Press
  9. Ko Kyojin, "T’oegye Yi Hwang and the Philosophy of Reverence (敬) (Yi T’oegye wa kyŏng ŭich’ŏlhak)" (1986), Shingu Munhwasa
  10. International Toegyehak Society of Taegu and Kyŏngbuk, "Study of T’oegyehak(T’oegyehak yŏn’gu)" (2002), Kyŏngsang pukto
  11. National Gugak Center, "Collection of Materials for Korean Musicology (韓國音樂學資料叢書)" (2005), National Gugak Center
  12. Keum Jangtae, "Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning and the Structure ofT’oegye Philosophy (Sŏnghak sipto wa T’oegye ch’ŏlhak ŭi kujo" (2001), SeoulNational University Press
  13. Keum Jangtae, "Confucian Philosophy of Early Chosŏn (Chosŏn chŏn’giŭi yuhak sasang)" (1997), Seoul National University Press
  14. Yi Sangŭn, "Translation of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (Sŏnghak sipto yŏkhae)" (1982), The T’oegye Studies Institute
  15. Yi Suhwan, "The Private Academies of Late Chosŏn (Chosŏn hugi sŏwŏn yŏn’gu)" (2001), Ilchogak
  16. Yi Hwang, "Sage Learning and Reverence (敬)(Sŏnghakkwa kyŏng)" (1982), Yangyeonggak
  17. Yi Hwang, "Explanation of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (Sŏnghak sipto yŏkhae)", Han’guk sŏwŏn
  18. Chŏng Pyŏngnyŏn, "The life and academic achievements of Kwŏn Sunmyŏng(Yangjae Kwŏn Sunmyŏng ŭi saengae wa hangmun)", Kanjaehak nonch’ong, 3 (2000), Kanjae hakhoe
  19. Chŏng Pyŏngsŏk, "T’oegye’s concept of sage learning and political thought asviewed through the Six-provision Memorial to the Throne in the year of Mujin (戊辰六條疏, Mujin yukchoso) (Mujin yukchoso e nat’anan T’oegye ŭi sŏnghak inyŏmkwa chŏngch’ijŏk sayu)", Journal of T’oegye Studies (T’oegye hakpo), 94(1) (1997), T’oegye Studies Institute
  20. Ch’oe Chaemok, "T’oegye’s reverence-based study of the mind and Yang Ming’sconscience-based study of the mind (T’oegye ŭi ‘kyŏng ŭi simhak kwa YangMyŏng ŭi yangji simhak)", T’oegye School and Korean Culture (T’oegyehak kwaHan’guk munhwa), 1(41) (2007), T’oegye Institute, KyungpookNational University
  21. Han Tŏkung, "The direction of the empirical studies on T’oegye’s study of themind (T’oegye simhak ŭi silchŭngjŏk yŏn’gu panghyang mosaek)", Journal of T’oegyeStudy (T’oegye hakpo), 89(1) (1996), The T’oegye Studies Institute
  22. Han Myŏngsu, "Study of T’oegye’s notion of reverence (敬) (T’oegye ŭi kyŏng ekwanhan yŏn’gu)", Journal of T’oegye Studies (T’oegye hakpo), 28(1) (1980), The T’oegye Studies Institute
  23. Ko Kyojin, "The structure of the philosophy behind the Ten Diagrams on SageLearning (Sŏnghak siptoŭi sasang ch’egye)", Study of T’oegyehak (T’oegyehak yŏn’gu), 1 (1987), Dankook University
  24. Ko Kyojin, "The structural organization of T’oegye’s philosophy—with a specialfocus on the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (T’oegye ch’ŏlhak ŭi ch’egyejŏk kusŏng –Sŏnghak sipto rŭl kich’oro)", Journal of T’oegye Studies (T’oegye hakpo), 40(1) (1983), The T’oegye Studies Institute
  25. Keum Jang-tae, "The annotations of the Ten Diagrams on SageLearning and the development of the study of T’oegye during late Chosŏn(Sŏnghak sipto chusŏk kwa Chosŏn hugi t’oegyehak ŭi chŏn’gae)", Journal of T’oegyeStudies (T’oegye hakpo), 48(1) (1985)
  26. Keum Jang-tae, "The Diagram of Elementary Learning (小學圖) and T’oegye’s moralpractice (Sohaktowa t’oegyeŭi todŏkchŏk silch’ŏn chŏngsin)", Journal of T’oegye Studies (T’oegye hakpo), 104(1) (1999), The T’oegye Studies Institute
  27. Keum Jang-tae, "The development of the T’oegye School’s philosophy during lateChosŏn (Chosŏn hugi t’oegye hakp’a ch’ŏlhak sasang ŭi chŏn’gae)", Study of Nammyŏng Philosophy (Nammyŏnghak yŏn’gu), 9 (1999), Institute of Nammyŏng Study, Gyeongsang National University
  28. Kim Tuhŏn, "T’oegye’s Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (T’oegye ŭi Sŏnghak sipto)", Journal of T’oegye Studies (T’oegye hakpo), 28(1) (1980), The T’oegyeStudies Institute
  29. Kim Chongsŏk, "T’oegye’s philosophy of the Study of the Mind as viewed fromthe Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (Sŏnghak sipto e nat’anan T’oegye ŭi simhaksegye)", Ch’ŏlhak nonch’ong, 12 (1996), PhilosophicalAssociation
  30. 이동건, "퇴계 『성학십도』의 성학(聖學)과 자기혁신(自己革新)의 방법", 동북아 문화연구, 1(20), pp.31~48 (2009), 동북아시아문화학회
  31. 이동건, "유포와 주석을 통해 본 조선시대 『성학십도』 이해에 관한 예비적 고찰 - 19세기의 양상을 중심으로 -", 양명학, (24), pp.345~378 (2009), 한국양명학회
  32. Lee Dongkun, "Study of the perceptions of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (聖學十圖)during Chosŏn Era: with a special focus on the trends in terms of thedistribution, deepening and diffusion of the Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning(Chosŏn sidae sŏnghak sipto ihae e taehan yŏn’gu: sŏnghak sipto yup’owa simhwa,hwaksanŭi yangsanŭl chungsimŭro)", 박사, pp.2010
  33. Pak Yangja, "Study of T’oegye’s Later theory of the Diagram of the Supreme Ultimate(太極圖說後敍) (T’oegyeŭi Ch’ŏnmyŏng tosŏl husŏ e kwanhayŏ)", Journal ofT’oegye Studies (T’oegye hakpo), 68(1) (1990), The T’oegye StudiesInstitute
  34. Pak Chonghŏng, "Yi T’oegye’s Ten Diagrams on Sage Learning (Yi T’oegye ŭiSŏnghak sipto)", Journal of T’oegye Studies (T’oegye hakpo), 28(1) (1980), The T’oegye Studies Institute
  35. Sin Kwihyŏn, "Chin Tŏksu’s Heart Sutra (心經) and Yi Hwang’s Study of theMind (心學) (Sŏsan chintŏksu ŭi simgyŏng kwa T’oegye Yi Hwang ŭi simhak)", Journal of T’oegye Studies (T’oegye hakpo), 53(1) (1987), The T’oegyeStudies Institute
  36. Sin Kwihyŏn, "Yi Hwang’s Simgyŏng puju and the characteristics of Yi’s Study of theMind (T’oegye yi hwangŭi Simgyŏng puju yŏn’gu wa kŭ ŭi simhak ŭi t’ŭksŏng)", Minjok munhwa nonch’ong, 8(1) (1987), Institute of KoreanCultural Studies, Yeungnam University
  37. 오석원, "『心經』의 구성과 수양론 연구(一)", 동양철학연구, 37(36), pp.349~388 (2004), 동양철학연구회
  38. Yu Kwŏnjong, "T’oegye’s sage learning and Tasan’s silhak (T’oegye sŏnghak kwaTasan silhak)", Study of Confucius (Kongjahak), 7(1) (2000), KoreanSociety of Confucian Studies
  39. Yu Sŏngnyŏl, "The actualization of T’oegye’s Way of Politics and the roles ofsage kings (T’oegye ŭi chŏngch’ido ŭi silhyŏn kwa sŏnggun ŭi yŏkhal)", Journal ofT’oegye Studies (T’oegeyhak yŏn’gu), 10 (1996), T’oegye Studies Institute,Dankook University

관련 논문AI추천

THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF SAGE POLITICS: THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES AND NEO-CONFUCIAN BASES OF YI HWANG AND YI I김형찬한국학연구원 · Acta Koreana2014 · 제17권 제1호유포와 주석을 통해 본 조선시대 『성학십도』 이해에 관한 예비적 고찰 - 19세기의 양상을 중심으로 -이동건한국양명학회 · 양명학2009 · 제24호Scholarship and Self-Cultivation: Reconstruction, Dissemination, and Internalization of Confucian Thought in Joseon through the Xiaoxue 小學LO Ming-Tung유교문화연구소 · Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture2017 · 제28호The Learning of Principle and the Governing by Culture in Joseon이봉규한국학중앙연구원 · The Review of Korean Studies2020 · 제23권 제2호Discursive Structures and Cultural Features of Nak-ron Thought in Late Joseon Korea조성산한국학중앙연구원 · Korea Journal2011 · 제51권 제1호A Study on T'oegye(退溪) Yi Hwang(李滉) : Ultimate Concern and Ultimate Reality of Chosun Confucianism이광호유교문화연구소 · Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture2010 · 제13호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

CONTEMPORARY KOREAN CINEMA: CHALLENGES AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF ‘PLANET HALLYUWOOD’심애경, BRIAN YECIESpp. 1-15AN INSIDER’S VIEW OF A FILM INDUSTRY IN TRANSITION: DARCY PAQUET’S MEDITATIONS ON THE CONTEMPORARY KOREAN CINEMADARCY PAQUETpp. 17-32SOMEWHERE BETWEEN ANTI-HEROISM AND PANTOMIME: SONG KANG-HO AND THE UNCANNY FACE OF THE KOREAN CINEMABRIAN YECIESpp. 33-71ANALYSIS OF CHANGHWA HONGNYŎN (A TALE OF TWO SISTERS)—WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON THE NARRATIVE AND CHARACTERS서정남pp. 73-116THREE PERIODS OF KOREAN QUEER CINEMA: INVISIBLE, CAMOUFLAGE, AND BLOCKBUSTERC. COLIN SINGER, 김필호pp. 117-136
원문 보기