본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Bush Administration and North Korea: Explaining Policy Change through Soft Balancing

3

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Why did the George W. Bush Administration change its policy toward NorthKorea from confrontation to accommodation during the second nuclear crisis?This article answers the question by analyzing how and why a coalition—includingBush Administration doves, China, Russia, South Korea and, at times, Japan andNorth Korea—worked together to overcome the reticence of Bush Administrationhawks to engage with Pyongyang. Building on the soft balancing, bureaucraticpolitics, and transgovernmental coalitions literature, this article explains how theSix-Party Talks served this coalition to understand the extent to which theyshared goals and policies. Aware of the divisions within the Bush Administrationregarding policy toward North Korea, the five other parties to the talks were ableto undermine the preferred policies of U.S. hawks while supporting the policiesof doves. Thus, rather than determining Washington’s behavior, this coalition laid theground for U.S. officials supportive of accommodation to upload their preferencesinto official Bush Administration’s policy. This article therefore also sheds light onhow soft balancing can be used by third parties to influence the decision-makingprocess in the United States.

Abstract

Why did the George W. Bush Administration change its policy toward NorthKorea from confrontation to accommodation during the second nuclear crisis?This article answers the question by analyzing how and why a coalition—includingBush Administration doves, China, Russia, South Korea and, at times, Japan andNorth Korea—worked together to overcome the reticence of Bush Administrationhawks to engage with Pyongyang. Building on the soft balancing, bureaucraticpolitics, and transgovernmental coalitions literature, this article explains how theSix-Party Talks served this coalition to understand the extent to which theyshared goals and policies. Aware of the divisions within the Bush Administrationregarding policy toward North Korea, the five other parties to the talks were ableto undermine the preferred policies of U.S. hawks while supporting the policiesof doves. Thus, rather than determining Washington’s behavior, this coalition laid theground for U.S. officials supportive of accommodation to upload their preferencesinto official Bush Administration’s policy. This article therefore also sheds light onhow soft balancing can be used by third parties to influence the decision-makingprocess in the United States.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. 류상영, "The Politics of Economic Sanctions against North Korea: the Bush Administration’s Strategy toward a Multilateral Governance", Pacific Focus, 25(1), pp.112~135 (2010), 국제관계연구소
  2. Bonnie S. Glaser, "North Korea: The Beginning of a China-U.S. Partnership", Washington Quarterly, 31(3), pp.165~180 (2008)
  3. Wade L. Huntley, "U.S. Policy toward North Korea in Strategic Context: Tempting Goliath’s Fate", Asian Survey, 47(3), pp.455~480 (2007)
  4. Leon V. Sigal, "Turnabout is Fair Play", Foreign Service Journal, 87(7–8), pp.30~35 (2007)
  5. Robert Sutter, "The Democratic-Led 110th Congress: Implications for Asia", Asia Policy, 3, pp.125~150 (2007)
  6. Charles L. Pritchard, "Failed Diplomacy: The Tragic Story of How North Korea Got the Bomb" (2007), Brookings Institution Press
  7. Robert A. Pape, "Soft Balancing against the United States", International Security, 30(1) (2005)
  8. T.V. Paul, "Soft Balancing in the Age of U.S. Primacy", International Security, 30(1) (2005)
  9. Kai He, "Institutional Balancing and International Relations Theory: Economic Interdependence and Balance of Power Strategies in Southeast Asia", European Journal of International Relations, 14(3), pp.489~518 (2008)
  10. Kai He, "If Not Soft Balancing, Then What? Reconsidering Soft Balancing and U.S. Policy toward China", Security Studies, 17(2), pp.363~395 (2008)
  11. Stephen M. Walt, "Alliances in a Unipolar World", World Politics, 61(1), pp.86~120 (2009)
  12. Graham T. Allison, "The Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, 2nd ed", Longman, pp.292~313 (1999)
  13. Robert O. Keohane, "Transgovernmental Relations and International Organizations", World Politics, 27(21) (1974)
  14. Robert O. Keohane, "Power and Interdependence, 3rd ed" (2001), Longman
  15. Robert O. Keohane, "The Demand for International Regimes", International Organization, 36(2), pp.349~ (1982)
  16. Christopher Hill, "The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy" (2003), Palgrave Macmillan
  17. Jerel A. Rosati, "The Politics of United States Foreign Policy, 5th ed" (2011), Wadsworth
  18. Russell J. Leng, "Bargaining and learning in recurring crises: The Soviet-American, Egyptian-Israeli, and Indo-Pakistani rivalries", pp.10~11 (2000), The University of Michigan Press
  19. Yoichi Funabashi, "The Peninsula Question: A Chronicle of the Second Korean Nuclear Crisis" (2007), Brookings Institution Press
  20. "Interview with Bush Administration DoD official, March 19, 2008", ~ (2008)
  21. "interview with Bush administration DoS official, March 28, 2008", ~ (2008)
  22. John Bolton, "Surrender is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations and Abroad" (2007), Threshold
  23. "Interview with Bush administration NSC official, April 3, 2008", ~ (2008)
  24. "Interview with Bush administration NSC official, April 9, 2008", ~ (2008)
  25. "Interview with DoS official, March 24, 2008, Washington, D.C", ~
  26. Georgy Toloraya, "Russian Policy in Korea in a Time of Change", The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 21(1), pp.67~84 (2009), 한국국방연구원
  27. 문정인, "Diplomacy of Defiance and Facilitation: The Six Party Talks and the Roh Moo Hyun Government", Asian Perspective, 32(4), pp.71~105 (2008), 극동문제연구소
  28. Tsuneo Ahaka, "North Korea Policy: Japan and the Great Powers", pp.19~37 (2006), Routledge
  29. Kuniko Ashizawa, "Tokyo’s Quandary, Beijing’s Moment in the Six-Party Talks: A Regional Multilateral Approach to Resolve the DPRK’s Nuclear Problem", Pacific Affairs, 79(3), pp.421~ (2006)
  30. Condoleezza Rice, "U.S. Policy toward Asia", speech at the Heritage Foundation, June 18, 2008, ~ (2008)
  31. "Talk by Han Song-ryol, July 4, 2007", ~ (2007)
  32. "Talk by Ja Song-nam, March 4, 2008", ~ (2008)
  33. Ramon Pacheco Pardo, "North Korea-US Relations under Kim Jong Il: The Quest for Normalization?", Routledge, ~ (2014)
  34. KCNA, "DPRK Foreign Ministry Clarifies Stand on New Measure to Bolster War Deterrent", Korean Central News Agency, ~ (2006)
  35. "Interview with Chinese official involved in the 6PT, April 22, 2009", ~ (2009)
  36. "Interview with Roh Moo-hyun administration official, August 12, 2008", ~ (2008)
  37. George W. Bush, "Decision Points" (2010), Crown
  38. Sung Chul Yang, "MEMOIRS OF A KOREAN AMBASSADOR: FROM ENGAGEMENT TO ENTANGLEMENT UNDER CLINTON AND BUSH", Asian Perspective, 34(3), pp.191~214 (2010), 극동문제연구소
  39. Donald Rumsfeld, "Known and Unknown: A Memoir" (2011), Sentinel
  40. Douglas J. Feith, "War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terror", pp.508~ (2009), HarperCollins
  41. Powell, C., "The Craft of Diplomacy", The Wilson Quarterly, 28(3), pp.66~ (2004)
  42. Georgy Toloraya, "The Six Party Talks: A Russian Perspective", Asian Perspective, 32(4), pp.45~69 (2008), 극동문제연구소
  43. Heungkyu Kim, "From a Buffer Zone to a Strategic Burden: Evolving Sino-North Korea Relations during Hu Jintao Era", The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 22(1), pp.57~74 (2010), 한국국방연구원
  44. "Interview with Bush administration official involved in the 6PT, April 4, 2008", ~ (2008)
  45. Mike Chinoy, "Meltdown: The Inside Story of the North Korean Nuclear Crisis" (2008), St Martin’s Press
  46. Joseph Khan, "U.S.-Korean Deal on Arms Leaves Key Points Open", New York Times, ~ (2005)
  47. "nterview with Bush administration DoS official, March 25, 2008", ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)