일본어의 경어가 지니는 불손성 -체면위협 유형과 힘의 작용을 중심으로-
Impoliteness of Japanese Honorifics: Focusing on Types of Face-Threatening Acts and the Power
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examined the impoliteness inherent in honorifics (in the Japanese language) with a focus on types of face-threatening acts. The results showed that the impoliteness of honorifics was found in face-threatening speech acts such as assertion of evaluation, restriction of action, stimulation of emotion, confrontation, and self-display. Moreover, it was confirmed that such impoliteness arises from the speaker’s intention in utterance implied in the marked use of honorifics. Meanwhile, there was a significantly higher percentage of assertion of evaluation than other types, suggesting that impoliteness is formed based on the negative evaluation of the other party. Furthermore, it was also discovered that impoliteness is related to the action of power. The speaker shows impoliteness when such an environment is created by the conflict of interest between the speaker and the listener, and it could be equally observed in all types that the speaker tries to achieve the purpose of utterance by exercising the power that intervenes. Finally, the study suggests that this action of power is related to dignity among the functions and effects of honorifics.
Abstract
This study examined the impoliteness inherent in honorifics (in the Japanese language) with a focus on types of face-threatening acts. The results showed that the impoliteness of honorifics was found in face-threatening speech acts such as assertion of evaluation, restriction of action, stimulation of emotion, confrontation, and self-display. Moreover, it was confirmed that such impoliteness arises from the speaker’s intention in utterance implied in the marked use of honorifics. Meanwhile, there was a significantly higher percentage of assertion of evaluation than other types, suggesting that impoliteness is formed based on the negative evaluation of the other party. Furthermore, it was also discovered that impoliteness is related to the action of power. The speaker shows impoliteness when such an environment is created by the conflict of interest between the speaker and the listener, and it could be equally observed in all types that the speaker tries to achieve the purpose of utterance by exercising the power that intervenes. Finally, the study suggests that this action of power is related to dignity among the functions and effects of honorifics.
참고문헌 (31)
- 권용재, "논증적 담화구조에서 수사의문문의 기능 연구 - 러시아 정치-외교적 담화를 중심으로 -", 수사학, (34), pp.5~31 (2019), 한국수사학회[DOI]
- 김동완, "日本語語用論" (2005), 울산대학교출판부
- 김수경, "「プラス待遇表現のマイナス待遇化」における 発話機能と人間関係", 일어일문학연구, 92(1), pp.23~42 (2015), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 임시은, "비난의 표현방식 –한일 화자의 비교–", 일본연구, (65), pp.351~373 (2015), 일본연구소[DOI]
- Beebe, L., M, "Linguistics and the Education of Language Teachers: Ethnolingu istic, Psycholingusitcis and Sociolinguistic Aspects", pp.154~168 (1995), Georgetown University Press
- Bourdieu, P., "Language and Symbolic Power" (1991), Polity Press
- Bousfield, D, "Impoliteness in interaction" (2008), John B enjamins Publishing
- Brown, P, "Politeness: Some universals in language u sage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Culpeper, J., "Towards an anatomy of impoliteness", Journal of Pragmatics, 25, pp.349~367 (1996)
- Holmes, J., "Power and Politeness in the Workplace-A Sociolin guistic Analysis of Talk at Work-" (2015), Routledge
- Locher, M. A., "Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral C ommunication" (2004), De Gruyter Mouton
- Locher, M. A., "Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice" (2008), De Gruyter Mouton
- Lukes, S., "Power. A Radical View" (1974), Macmillan
- van Dijk, T. A., "Discourse and Power" (2008), Macmillan Internationa l Higher Education
- Watts, R. J., "Power in Family Discourse" (1991), Mouton d e Gruyter
- 安達太郎, "疑問文における反語解釈をめぐる覚え書き", 京都橘女子大学研究紀要, 31, pp.35~50 (2005)
- 宇佐美まゆみ, "ディスコース‧ポライトネス理論構想(2)-発話行為レベルの絶対的ポライトネスから談話レベルの相対的ポライトネスへ-", 言語, 39(1), pp.101~105 (2002)
- 大石太郎, "現代敬語研究" (1975), 筑摩書房
- 岡本真一郎, "ことばのコミュニケーション―対人関係のレトリック" (2007), ナカニシヤ出版
- 吳泰均, "日本語聞き手待遇表現の社会誤用論的研究" (2020), 北海道大学出版会
- 菊地康人, "敬語" (1997), 講談社学術文庫
- 北原保雄, "明鏡国語辞典" (2020), 大修館書店
- 久保進, "発話内行為の意味ネットワーク-言語行為論からの辞書的対話事例分析-" (2002), 晃洋書房
- 滝浦真人, "<視点>と<距離>の敬語論:日本語敬語の語用論的記述理論のために", 言語と文明, 3, pp.21~38 (2005)
- 滝浦真人, "ポライトネス入門" (2008), 研究社
- 中村明, "日本語レトリックの体系―文体のなかにある表現技法のひろがり" (1991), 岩波書店
- 西尾純二, "マイナスの待遇表現行動-対象を低く悪く扱う表現への規制と配慮-" (2015), くろしお出版
- 橋本邦彦, "修辞疑問文", 言語学論叢, 1, pp.33~47 (1982)
- 松村明, "大辞林" (2006), 物書堂
- 南不二男, "敬語" (1987), 岩波新書
- 山田忠雄, "新明解国語辞典" (2012), 三省堂