언어사용역을 활용한 공학 텍스트의 탐색과 분석
Exploration on Engineering Texts Based on Language Register and Their Analysis
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research aims to explore characteristics of ‘engineering writing’(often called, ‘technical writing for engineers’) as well as analyze texts written in the related field based on language register. Three main components utilized in this study are concerned with ‘field of discourse’, ‘mode of discourse’ and ‘tenor of discourse’. It is generally known that ‘engineering writing’ is related to two key competencies. The first is the ability to understand technical language in related fields and the second is being able to express their knowledge in a clear, concise, and coherent way. Even though engineers are a great of technical knowledge and technical people, that does not necessarily mean they are good enough technical writers to convey important outcomes. Recently, domestic and overseas studies regarding engineering writing and related texts have focused on WAC or WID. However, there is still a lack of systematic researches on education contents, teaching methods, and case studies about lecture practice in the field of engineering writing. Therefore, various studies and discussions are still needed. The main results of this study are as follows. Firstly, various textuals related to ‘field of discourse’ could be extracted as the IMRAD format, discourse purpose and technical terms, etc. and their more sophisticated analysis is required. Secondly, according to ‘mode of discourse’, engineering writing and texts belongs to the text type with literacy, opposed to orality. Third, regarding ‘tenor of discourse’, engineering texts made use of the relationship between the addresser and the addressee, in terms of ‘formal’ and ‘impersonal’ distinctions. Through the results of this study, it is recommended that extended engineering texts should be analyzed in more detail.
Abstract
This research aims to explore characteristics of ‘engineering writing’(often called, ‘technical writing for engineers’) as well as analyze texts written in the related field based on language register. Three main components utilized in this study are concerned with ‘field of discourse’, ‘mode of discourse’ and ‘tenor of discourse’. It is generally known that ‘engineering writing’ is related to two key competencies. The first is the ability to understand technical language in related fields and the second is being able to express their knowledge in a clear, concise, and coherent way. Even though engineers are a great of technical knowledge and technical people, that does not necessarily mean they are good enough technical writers to convey important outcomes. Recently, domestic and overseas studies regarding engineering writing and related texts have focused on WAC or WID. However, there is still a lack of systematic researches on education contents, teaching methods, and case studies about lecture practice in the field of engineering writing. Therefore, various studies and discussions are still needed. The main results of this study are as follows. Firstly, various textuals related to ‘field of discourse’ could be extracted as the IMRAD format, discourse purpose and technical terms, etc. and their more sophisticated analysis is required. Secondly, according to ‘mode of discourse’, engineering writing and texts belongs to the text type with literacy, opposed to orality. Third, regarding ‘tenor of discourse’, engineering texts made use of the relationship between the addresser and the addressee, in terms of ‘formal’ and ‘impersonal’ distinctions. Through the results of this study, it is recommended that extended engineering texts should be analyzed in more detail.
참고문헌 (33)
- 강명구, "과학기술 글쓰기" (2008), 서울대학교출판부
- 강범모, "한국어의 텍스트 장르, 문체, 유형: 컴퓨터와 통계적 기법의 이용" (2000), 태학사
- 과학 글쓰기를 잘하려면 기승전결을 버려라, 실험보고서에서 네이처 논문까지, "강호정", 이음, ~ (2007)
- 그로스, 앨런, "과학의 수사학" (2007), 궁리
- 기노시타 고레오, "이공계를 위한 글쓰기 10계명: 과학 글쓰기 핸드북" (2006), 사이언스 북스
- 김정이, "이공계 글쓰기 수업 연구의 동향", 한국융합학회논문지, 9(1), pp.41~50 (2018), 한국융합학회[DOI]
- 모라이어티, 마릴린, "비판적 사고와 과학 글쓰기" (2008), 연세대학교 출판부
- 민양기, "영문과학논문 작성매뉴얼 이공계 연구자를 위한 영문과학논문 작성매뉴얼" (2013), 범문에듀케이션
- 배원병, "이공계가 한다! 글쓰기와 발표하기" (2003), 북스힐
- 신선경, "과학탐구와 과학 글쓰기에 대한 텍스트언어학적 접근", 텍스트언어학, 24(0), pp.75~99 (2008), 한국텍스트언어학회[DOI]
- 신형기, "과학글쓰기" (2006), 사이언스북스
- 오윤정, "과학자와 이공계 대학생의 과학 글쓰기에 대한 경험과 인식", 박사, 과학교육학과, pp.2013
- 임재춘, "한국의 이공계는 글쓰기가 두렵다" (2003), 마이넌
- 이희영, "대학생 공학 글쓰기에서 나타나는 오류의 유형과 분석", 작문연구, (20), pp.267~297 (2014), 한국작문학회
- 하팀, 배질, "담화와 번역가" (2011), 동인
- 황순희, "언어사용역을 고려한 불한번역의 화용적 접근", 프랑스어문교육, (25), pp.165~189 (2007), 한국프랑스어문교육학회
- 황순희, "공학인 대상 ‘공적 말하기’ 강의내용 개발 연구 (I) - <프레젠테이션과 토론>을 중심으로 -", 수사학, (14), pp.127~165 (2011), 한국수사학회
- Austin, J.L., "How to do things with words" (1962), Harvard University Press
- Beaugrande, R.D., "Introduction to text linguistics" (1981), Longman
- Gregory, M., "Language and situation: Language varieties and their social contexts" (1978), Routledge
- Hall, E.T., "La dimension cachée" (1978), Seuil
- Halliday, M.A.K., "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
- Jakobson, R., "Essais de linguistique générale I" (1963), Minuit
- Klein, P.D., "Trends in research on writing as a learning activity", Journal of Writing Research, 7(3), pp.311~350 (2016)
- Knipper, K. J., "Writing to learn across the curriculum: Tools for comprehension in content area classes", The Reading Teacher, 59(5), pp.462~470 (2006)
- Leydens, J.A., "Innovations in composition programs that educate engineers: Drivers, opportunities, and challenges", Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), pp.255~271 (2009)
- McLaren, I. A., "Writing right: Enhancing student engagement and performance in an ecology course", International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(4), pp.365~380 (2009)
- Ong, W.J., "Orality and literacy" (1982), Routledge
- Searle, J.R., "A Classifícation of Illocutionary Acts", Language in society, 5, pp.1~23 (1976)
- Sorby, S.A., "An engineer's guide to technical communication" (2006), Pearson Prentice Hall
- Strunk, W., "The elements of style" (2000), Pearson Education
- Wellington, J., "Language and literacy in science education" (2001), Open University Press
- Werlich, E., "A text grammar of English" (1976), Quelle & Meyer