본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

과학 탐구 기반의 통합적 STEM 교육 모형 개발 및 적용

Development and Application of Integrative STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) Education Model Based on Scientific Inquiry

박경숙|권혁수|오희진|이효녕
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)|2014.04|한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education)|제34권 제2호|pp. 63-78|DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.2.0063

0

조회

0

다운로드

29

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

integrated educationmathematics educationscientific inquiryscience educationdesign-based learning통합 교육과학 교육기술 교육수학 교육과학적 탐구technology education통합적 STEM 교육설계 기반 학습integrative STEM education
주제분류교육학

초록

통합적 STEM 교육은 과학, 기술, 공학, 수학의 내용과 과정을 체계적이고 의도적으로 통합하려는 공학적 설계기반 학습을 말하며, 다른 교과와 통합을 통해 더욱 발달할 수 있다. 이 연구는 과학 탐구 기반의 통합적 STEM 교육 프로그램의 개발과 효과 검증을 위한 기초연구이며, STEM 교육 관련 문헌 연구를 통해 STEM 교육의 가치와 핵심 요소를 분석하고 과학 탐구 기반의 통합적 STEM 교육 모형의 개발 및 모형을 적용하여 개발한 대표적인 예시 프로그램을 제시하는 것이다. 모형에 포함될 요소를 확정하기 위해 문헌 분석을 실시하였고, 선행 연구에 포함된 내용과 탐구 과정을 분석하여 통합적 STEM 교육 모형을 구성하였다. 전문가의 내용 타당도 분석 결과 CVR 값의 평균은 0.78로 구성된 모형은 내용 타당도가 있는 것으로 판단되었다. 이 STEM 교육 모형은 내용과 탐구 과정의 두 가지 측면으로 나누어진다. 내용의 측면은 실생활 문제에서 경험할 수 있는 과학, 기술, 공학, 수학 그리고 인문사회와 예술적 소재까지 포괄할 수 있으며, 탐구 과정은 설계와 제작을 기반으로 한 문제해결 과정이다. 탐구 과정은 과학 탐구를 기반으로 하여 기술·공학적 문제해결 과정을 적용할 수 있도록 구성하였다. 학생들은 실생활 문제를 분석하고, 설계하고 제작하는 과정에서 STEM 교과에 대한 흥미를 향상시킬 수 있고 문제에 포함된 지식과 탐구의 방법과 기능을 체계적으로 학습할 수 있다. 개발된 프로그램은 학교 현장에서 활용되어, STEM 교과에 대한 이해도 증진과 과학, 수학에 대한 흥미를 높이고, 과학기술 기반의 융합적 소양과 설계 기반의 문제해결력을 배양하는 데 기여할 수 있을 것이다.

Abstract

Integrative STEM education is an engineering design-based learning approach that purposefully integrates the content and process of STEM disciplines and can extend its concept to integration with other school subjects. This study was part of fundamental research to develop an integrative STEM education program based on the science inquiry process. The specific objectives of this study were to review relevant literature related to STEM education, analyze the key elements and value of STEM education, develop an integrative STEM education model based on the science inquiry process, and suggest an exemplary program. This study conducted a systematic literature review to confirm key elements for integrative STEM education and finally constructed the integrative STEM education model through analyzing key inquiry processes extracted from prior studies. This model turned out to be valid because the average CVR value obtained from expert group was 0.78. The integrative STEM education model based on the science inquiry process consisted of two perspectives of the content and inquiry process. The content can contain science, technology, engineering, and liberal arts/artistic topics that students can learn in a real world context/problem. Also, the inquiry process is a problem-solving process that contains design and construction and is based on the science inquiry. It could integrate the technological/engineering problem solving process and/or mathematical problem solving process. Students can improve their interest in STEM subjects by analyzing real world problems, designing possible solutions, and implementing the best design as well as acquire knowledge, inquiry methods, and skills systematically. In addition, the developed programs could be utilized in schools to enhance students’ understanding of STEM disciplines and interest in mathematics and science. The programs could be used as a basis for fostering convergence literacy and cultivating integrated and design-based problem–solving ability.

참고문헌 (153)

  1. Apedoe, X. S., "Bringing engineering design into high school science classrooms : The heating", cooling unit, 2008, pp.17(5), 454~465
  2. Austin. C. Y., "Factors influencing African American high school students in career decision-making self efficacy and engineering related goal intentions", doctor, pp.2009
  3. Bae, S., "The development of activity-centered STEM education program of electricity, electronics, and communication area in industrial technical high school", doctor, pp.2009
  4. 배선아, "중학교 전기전자기술 영역의 활동 중심 STEM 교육프로그램 개발 및 적용", 대한공업교육학회지, 36(1), pp.1~22 (2011), 대한공업교육학회
  5. 배선아, "공업계열 전문계 고등학교 화공 분야의 STEM 교육에 대한 화공교사의 인식과 요구", 대한공업교육학회지, 35(1), pp.44~67 (2010), 대한공업교육학회
  6. 배선아, "공업계열 전문계 고등학교 활동 중심 STEM 교육프로그램 개발 모형", 실과교육연구, 15(4), pp.345~368 (2009), 한국실과교육연구학회
  7. Bandura, A., "Social foundations of thought and action" (1986), Prentice-Hall
  8. Bandura, A., "Social cognitive theory of self-regulation", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, pp.248~287 (1991)
  9. Bandura, A., "Self-efficacy: The exercise of control" (1997), W. H. Freeman and Company
  10. Bandura, A., "Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective", Annual Review of Psychology, 52, pp.1~26 (2001)
  11. Berlin, D. F., "Integrating science and mathematics education : Historical analysis", School Science and Mathematics, 105(1), pp.15~24 (2005)
  12. Bisogno, J., "Virtual bridge design", pp.26~33 (2008), Science Scope
  13. Brooks, J. G., "In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms" (1999), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  14. Burghardt, M. D., "Informed design : A contemporary approach to design pedagogy as the core process in technology", Technology Teacher, 64(1), pp.6~8 (2004)
  15. Burney, V. H., "Applications of social cognitive theory to gifted education", Roeper Review, 30, pp.130~139 (2008)
  16. technology, "NSTA yearbook: science", pp.National Science Teachers Association, society
  17. Bybee, R. W., "Teaching about science-technology-society(STS) : View of science education in the United State", School Science and Mathematics, 87(4), pp.274~285 (1987)
  18. Bybee, R. W., "Achieving technological literacy : A national imperative", The Technology Teacher, 60(1), pp.23~28 (2000)
  19. Bybee, R. W., "Advancing STEM education : A 2020 Vision", Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), pp.30~35 (2010)
  20. Byeon, S. H., "Development and application of invention educational program for students' creativity", master, pp.2010
  21. Carroll, D. R., "Bridge engineering for the elementary grades", Journal of Engineering Education, 86(3), pp.221~226 (1997)
  22. "Integrated Mathematics, Science, and Technology (IMaST) Modules" (2011)[URL]
  23. Chiappetta, E. L., "Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools" (2002), Merrill
  24. Cho, H., "Science-Technology-Society and science education" (1994), Kyoyookbook Publishing Company
  25. Cho, H., "The theory of science and science education" (1995), Kyoyookbook Publishing Company
  26. 조재주, "화학영역의 통합적 STEM 발명교육 프로그램 모형 개발", 실과교육연구, 17(1), pp.165~188 (2011), 한국실과교육연구학회
  27. 최봉섭, "아동의 만들기 체험활동을 위한 TSM 통합교육 프로그램 개발-모형 배 만들기 중심으로-", 한국실과교육학회지, 17(3), pp.191~205 (2004), 한국실과교육학회
  28. Choi, K., "Understanding and application of STS education" (1996), Kyohak Publishing Company
  29. Choi, K., "An analysis of STS material and activity in the middle school science textbooks published by the sixth curriculum", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 17(4), pp.425~433 (1997)
  30. 최유현, "STEM 기반 발명영재교육 프로그램 개발과 적용 효과", 한국기술교육학회지, 8(2), pp.143~164 (2008), 한국기술교육학회
  31. 2009, , ~
  32. Daugherty, J. L., "Engineering professional development design for secondary school teachers : A multiple case study", Journal of Technology Education, 21(1), pp.5~19 (2009)
  33. De Romero, N., "Design challenges "ELL-elementary"", Science Children, pp.34~37 (2006)
  34. "The national curriculum in England Framework document" (2013)[URL]
  35. "Reform of the national curriculum in England" (2013)[URL]
  36. Everett, L. J., "Integrated curricula : Purpose and design", Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), pp.167~175 (2000)
  37. Farrior, D., "Interdisciplinary lively application projects in calculus courses", Journal of STEM Education, 8(3), pp.50~61 (2007)
  38. Fitzgerald, M., "Cereal box design: An interdisciplinary graphics activity", Techdirection, pp.22~25 (2004)
  39. Florida, R., "The Rise of Creative Class" (2002), Basic Books
  40. Fortus, D., "Design-Based Science and Student Learning", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.1081~1110 (2004)
  41. Frazier, W., "Motor mania: Revving up for technological design", The Technology Teacher, pp.5~12 (2008)
  42. Freudenthal, H., "Revisiting mathematics education" (1991), Kluwer Academic Publisher
  43. Hacker, M., "Technology education: Learning by design" (2004), Prentice-Hall
  44. Harms, H. R., "Pre-Engineering" (2012), McGraw Hill
  45. Hofstein, A., "Discussions over STS at the fourth IOSTE symposium", International Journal of Science Education, 10(4), pp.357~366 (1988)
  46. Hong, J., "The effects of decision-making centered - STS(Science -Technology -Society) classes on the students’ attitudes towards science and perceptions about STS", Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(2), pp.422~432 (2001)
  47. Hughes, B., "How to start a STEM team", The Technology Teacher, 69(2), pp.27~29 (2009)
  48. Hutchinson, P., "Children designing & engineering : Contextual learning units in primary design and technology", Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), pp.122~145 (2002)
  49. 2009, , ~
  50. 2007, , ~
  51. 2003, , ~
  52. Jang, K. Y., "The changes of teacher perceptions on professional development program about multi-subject integration-based invention", master, pp.2009
  53. Jang, S., "Creative invention problem solving based on STEM" (2008), Korean Intellectual Property Office(KIPO)
  54. Jensen, R., "Dream society", pp.2001, Glencoe
  55. Jung, Y., "A Study on Freudenthal's mathematising instruction theory", doctor, pp.1997
  56. Karsnitz, J. R., "Engineering design:An instruction" (2009), Delmar
  57. 김부윤, "우리나라에서의 수학적 문제해결연구", 수학교육, 42(2), pp.6~158 (2003), 한국수학교육학회
  58. 김진수, "기술교육의 새로운 통합교육 방법인 STEM 교육의 탐색", 한국기술교육학회지, 7(3), pp.1~29 (2007), 한국기술교육학회
  59. 김진수, "STEAM 교육을 위한 큐빅 모형", 한국기술교육학회지, 11(2), pp.124~139 (2011), 한국기술교육학회
  60. Recent trends of education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in the U.S, "Kim, J.", Korea Institute of Science & Technology Evaluation and Planning, ~, pp.Report 2012-001 (2011)
  61. Characteristics of achievement trend in Korea's middle and high school students from International Achievement Assessment(TIMSS, "PISA)", Kim, K., 2008, REE 2008-3-1
  62. 김성원, "융합인재교육(STEAM)을 위한 이론적 모형의 제안", 한국과학교육학회지, 32(2), pp.388~401 (2012), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
  63. Kim, Y., "A social cognitive framework for designing pedagogical agents as learning companions", Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(6), pp.569~596 (2006)
  64. National assessment of educational achievement in 2005: The result analysis of the mathematics achievement test, "Ko, J.", Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation, ~, pp.RRE 2007-3-4 (2007)
  65. Kolodner, J. L., "Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle school science classroom : putting learning by design into practice", Journal of Learning Science, 12(4), pp.495~547 (2003)
  66. "2012", ~
  67. "2012", ~
  68. 권혁수, "Motivation Issues in the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education: A Meta-Analytic Approach", 중등교육연구, 56(3), pp.125~147 (2008), 사범대학부속중등교육연구소
  69. Education, "과학교육연구지", 2009, 207~219, pp.과학교육연구소
  70. 권혁수, "Research Trends on the Integrative Efforts in Technology Education: Reviews of the Relevant Journals", 중등교육연구, 57(1), pp.245~274 (2009), 사범대학부속중등교육연구소
  71. Kwon, J. S., "Problems of discipline centered science education and a method of the utilization of everyday materials in science education", Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 11(1), pp.117~126 (1991)
  72. Kwon, Y., "Science education:From thinking to learning" (2013), Bookshill Publishing Company
  73. LaPorte, J. E., "Integrating technology, science, and mathematics in the middle school", The Technology Teacher, 52(6), pp.17~21 (1993)
  74. LaPorte, J. E., "Technology science mathematics:Connection activities binder. Vol. 52", pp.1996, Glencoe
  75. Lawshe, C. H., "A quantitative approach to content validity", Personnel Psychology, 28(4), pp.563~575 (1975)
  76. Lee, D., "The need for STEM Education, awareness and demand for technology teachers", master, pp.2011
  77. STEAM education, "The understanding and application of science inquiry and design-based STEM", pp.2012, Lee, H.
  78. 이효녕, "공학적 설계와 과학 탐구 과정 기반의 STEM 교육 프로그램 개발 및 적용", 교원교육, 29(3), pp.301~326 (2013), 교육연구원
  79. 이소이, "STEM 교육을 위한 기술 수업 설계 모형", 한국기술교육학회지, 11(3), pp.1~20 (2011), 한국기술교육학회
  80. Lewis, T., "Design and inquiry: Bases for an accommodation between science and technology education in the curriculum?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), pp.255~281 (2006)
  81. Lomask, M., "Extended performance tasks for Mathematics, Science & Technology", ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 402 346, ~ (1996)
  82. Lou, S-J., "The Impact of Problem-Based Learning Strategies on STEM Knowledge Integration and Attitudes : An Exploratory Study among Female Taiwanese Senior High School Students", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), pp.195~215 (2011)
  83. Lou, S-J., "How to Promote Knowledge Transfer through a Problem-Based Learning Internet Platform for Vocational High School Students", European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(5), pp.539~551 (2010)
  84. Mcdermott, R., "Thinking practices", pp.321~340 (1998), Lawence Erlbaum Association
  85. McGinnis, J., "Perceptions of making connections between science and mathematics in a science methods course", Journal of Elementary Science Education, 18(2), pp.13~30 (2006)
  86. Merill, C., "STEM education and leadership: A mathematics and science partnership approach", Journal of Technology Education, 21(2), pp.21~34 (2010)
  87. "1999", ~
  88. "2001", ~
  89. "2007", ~
  90. "2008", ~
  91. "2009", ~
  92. "2010", ~
  93. "2011", ~
  94. "2012", ~
  95. "2013", ~
  96. Minogue, J., "Paper tower: Building students’understanding of technological design", Science Scope, pp.18~20 (2006)
  97. 문대영, "STEM 통합 접근의 사전 공학교육 프로그램 모형 개발", 공학교육연구, 11(2), pp.90~101 (2008), 한국공학교육학회
  98. Murray, J., "Inventors in the making", Science and Children, pp.40~44 (2005)
  99. National Academies Press, , 2002
  100. National Academies Press, , 2004
  101. National Academies Press, , 2005
  102. "U.S. Department of Education", 2009, NCES 2009-161
  103. "1989", ~
  104. "1991", ~
  105. "1995", ~
  106. "2000", ~
  107. National Academy Press, , 1996
  108. National Academies Press, , 2000
  109. National Academies Press, , 2002
  110. The National Academies Press, , 2011
  111. The National Academies Press, , 2012
  112. The National Academies Press, , 2013
  113. 1995, , ~
  114. Norton, S. J., "The use of design practice to teach mathematics and science", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(1), pp.19~44 (2006)
  115. OECD, "PISA 2006 Science Competencies for tomorrow's world. Volume 1: Analysis" (2007), OECD
  116. Park, H., "The development of activity-centered MST program through making solar cell car for fifth and sixth grade elementary school", master, pp.2003
  117. Pearson, F., "Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology" (2002), National Academy Press
  118. Petroski, H., "Invention by design: How engineers get from thought to thing" (1996), Harvard University Press
  119. Polya, G., "How to solve it" (1957), Doubleday Co. Inc
  120. Poster, A. L., "A systems model of innovation processes in university STEM education", Journal of Engineering, 95(1), pp.13~24 (2006)
  122. Puntambekar, S., "Toward implementing distributed scaffolding : Helping students learn science from design", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), pp.185~217 (2005)
  123. Racow, S. J., "Teaching science as inquiry" (1986), Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation
  124. Rogers, M. A., "Science and mathematics: A natural connection", Science and Children, pp.60~61 (2007)
  125. Roth, W-M, "Learning Science through technological design", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), pp.768~790 (1991)
  126. Roth, W-M, "Problem-centered learning for the integration of mathematics and science in a constructivist laboratory : A case study", School Science & Mathematics, 93(3), pp.13~122 (1993)
  127. Roth, W-M., "Authentic school science : knowing and learning in open-inquiry school laboratories" (1995), Kluwer Academic Publisher
  128. Roth, W-M., "Learning to talk engineering design: Results from an interpretive study in a grade 4", 5 classroom, 1996, pp.6(2), 107~135
  129. Roth, W-M., "Learning science through technological design", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), pp.768~790 (2001)
  130. Rowell, P. W., "Characterization of technology within an elementary science program", International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), pp.37~56 (1999)
  131. Sanders, M., "Technology education in the middle level school : Its role and purpose", NASSP Bulletin, 83(608), pp.34~44 (1999)
  132. Sanders, M., "A rationale for new approaches to STEM education and STEM education graduate programs", Paper presented at the 93rd Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference (2006)
  133. Sanders, M., "STEM, STEM education, STEM mania", Technology Teacher, 68(4), pp.20~26 (2009)
  134. Sanders, M., "An introduction to integrative STEM education", International Seminar for integrative STEAM Education (2011)
  135. "Integrative STEM Education definition" (2011)[URL]
  136. Scarborough, S. R., "PHYS-MA-TECH : An integrated partnership", Journal of Technology Education, 5(2), pp.31~39 (1994)
  137. Sinn, J., "Technology-based math and science applications", The Technology Teacher, 55(2), pp.16~24 (1995)
  138. Smith, K. L., "Teaching engineering at the K-12level : Two perspectives", The Technology Teacher, 66(7), pp.20~24 (2007)
  139. Song, J. B., "A Study on the development of classroom-friendly robot-education model and program for the STEM integration education", master, pp.2010
  140. Torp, L. T., "Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-16 education" (2002), Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  141. U.S. Department of Education, "Race to the top program executive summary" (2009), Government Printing Office
  142. Venville, G., "Decision making and sources of knowledge: How students tackle integrated tasks in science, technology, and mathematics", Research in Science Education, 34, pp.115~125 (2004)
  143. Venville, G., "The integration of science, mathematics, and technology in a discipline-based culture", School Science and Mathematics, 98(6), pp.294~302 (1998)
  144. Vygotsky, L. S., "Thought and Language" (1962), M.I.T. Press
  145. Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  146. Wang, S., "The application of social cognitive theory to web-based learning through NetPorts", British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(4), pp.600~612 (2007)
  147. Wender, I., "Relation of technology, science, self-concept, interest, and gender", Journal of Technology Studies, 30(3), pp.43~51 (2004)
  148. Wiggins, G., "Understanding by design" (1998), Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development
  149. Yager, R. E., "The Science", technology, Social Education, pp.1990, 54(4)[DOI]
  150. Yager, R. E., "A STS approach to human biology instruction affects, achievement and attitude of elementary science majors", The America Biology Teacher, 54(6), pp.349~355 (1992)
  151. Yakman, G., "STΣ@M Education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education", Pupils Attitudes Towards Technology 2008Annual Proceedings (2008)
  152. Yang, J., "The effect of 3D CAD based STEM education on spatial visualization ability of elementary school's students", master, pp.2009
  153. Ziman, J., "Teaching and learning about science and society", pp.1980

관련 논문AI추천

STEM 통합 접근의 사전 공학교육 프로그램 모형 개발문대영한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2008 · 제11권 제2호과학·공학 융합 수업 준거틀 및 공학 설계 수준 제안김순식, 남윤경, 이용섭대한지구과학교육학회 · 대한지구과학교육학회지2020 · 제13권 제1호통합 STEM 교육에 대한 중등 교사의 인식과 요구권혁수, 남정철, 박경숙, 방성혜, 서보현, 손동일, 오영재, 오희진, 이성수, 이효녕, 정현일, 한인기한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2012 · 제32권 제1호초·중등 공학교육 프로그램 구성 모형 개발김기수, 김영민한국공학교육학회 · 공학교육연구2017 · 제20권 제4호공업계열 전문계 고등학교 활동 중심 STEM 교육프로그램 개발 모형금영충, 배선아한국실과교육연구학회 · 실과교육연구2009 · 제15권 제4호STEM, STEAM 교육과 우리나라 융합인재교육의 이해와 해결 과제김현경, 심재호, 이양락한국과학교육학회 · 한국과학교육학회지2015 · 제35권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

과학적 소양의 정의 분류의 특성 및 경향이명제pp. 55-62탐구 실험을 활용한 과학교사 논변 과제 개발과정에서 드러난 쟁점 및 수정 효과: 기체에 대한 샤를의 법칙 실험 사례백종호, 황세영, 정대홍pp. 79-92집단 창의성 교육을 위한 방안으로서 과학 교육에 디자인적 사고의 도입과 속성 탐색강성주, 이도현, 윤지현pp. 93-105논의 및 과학 글쓰기 관련 국내 과학 교육 연구 동향 분석최애란, 신지원pp. 107-122고등학생들의 융합에 대한 태도 검사도구의 개발과 타당화박현주, 임재근, 신세인, 정덕호, 하민수, 이준기pp. 123-134
원문 보기