본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Case Studies of Disasters and Governance

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

There are so many case studies about disasters that this paper focuses on an illustrative small sample dealing primarily with two countries, the United States and South Korea. In the United States, a combination of real-world natural disasters and simulated terrorist attacks implied very high levels of business interruption that could justify an overall strategy of significant spending on prevention and mitigation. An equally important point is the risk of top-down governance failures revealed in Hurricane Katrina (2005). The South Korean examples are very different. A long series of typhoons over more than two decades showed some gains in reduced fatalities, although the emergency management system remains imperfect despite a series of legislative actions including the recent Public Safety and Security Act of 2014. Much worse were several man-made disasters reflecting design weaknesses, inadequate prevention, the lack of regulations and inspection, and even corruption. There were many examples including the Sungsoo bridge, the Sampoong store, the Daegu subway, the Sewol ferry, the Pangyo concert, and the nuclear power errors. Two more examples are the Mexico City earthquake of 1985 in which successful bottom-up action by volunteers surprisingly took place in an autocratic society and the Thames Barrier in London, the UK (1996-83) where a “czar” was in complete charge of a very ambitious flood protection project.

Abstract

There are so many case studies about disasters that this paper focuses on an illustrative small sample dealing primarily with two countries, the United States and South Korea. In the United States, a combination of real-world natural disasters and simulated terrorist attacks implied very high levels of business interruption that could justify an overall strategy of significant spending on prevention and mitigation. An equally important point is the risk of top-down governance failures revealed in Hurricane Katrina (2005). The South Korean examples are very different. A long series of typhoons over more than two decades showed some gains in reduced fatalities, although the emergency management system remains imperfect despite a series of legislative actions including the recent Public Safety and Security Act of 2014. Much worse were several man-made disasters reflecting design weaknesses, inadequate prevention, the lack of regulations and inspection, and even corruption. There were many examples including the Sungsoo bridge, the Sampoong store, the Daegu subway, the Sewol ferry, the Pangyo concert, and the nuclear power errors. Two more examples are the Mexico City earthquake of 1985 in which successful bottom-up action by volunteers surprisingly took place in an autocratic society and the Thames Barrier in London, the UK (1996-83) where a “czar” was in complete charge of a very ambitious flood protection project.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Blakely, E. J., "My Storm: Managing the Recovery of New Orleans in the Wake of Katrina: The City in the Twenty First Century" (2011), University of Pennsylvania Press
  2. Caiden, G. E., "Where Corruption Lives" (2001), Kumarian Press
  3. Campbell, A. F., "New Orleans’ Post-Katrina Identity Crisis", National Journal, 20 (2014)
  4. Clarke, L., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications", pp.84~92 (2008), Edward Elgar
  5. Clay, E. J., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications", pp.230~252 (2008), Edward Elgar
  6. Gordon, P., "Transport-related impacts of the Northridge Earthquake", Journal of Transportation and Statistics, 1, pp.21~36 (1998)
  7. Emergency Management in Korea : Just Started, but Rapidly Evolving, "Ha, K. -M.", National Institute for Disaster Prevention, National Emergency Management Agency of Korea, ~ (2010)
  8. Ha, K. -M., "Selective versus Comprehensive Emergency Management in Korea", SpringerPlus, 3, pp.602~ (2014)
  9. Ha, K. -M., "National Emergency Management Systems : The United States and Korea", Journal of Emergency Management, 6(2), pp.31~44 (2008)
  10. Ha, K. -M., "Developing Voluntary Agencies in Emergency Management : The United States and Korea", Journal of Emergency Management, 6(4), pp.39~50 (2008)
  11. Kim, P. S., "Emergency Management in Korea and its Future Direction", Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 6(4), pp.189~201 (1998)
  12. Independent Investigation Commission, "The Fukushima Incident", IIC, ~ (2012)
  13. Logan, J. R., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications", pp.279~297 (2008), Edward Elgar
  14. Miernyk, W. H., "Impact of the Space Program on a Local Economy: An Input-Output Analysis" (1967), West Virginia University Press
  15. Park, J. -Y., "Identifying Regional Economic Impacts of 9", 11, 2009, pp.15, 1~34
  16. Harry W. Richardson, "Conceptual Issues in Disaster and Governance", 국정관리연구, 9(2), pp.15~29 (2014), 성균관대학교 국정관리대학원
  17. Richardson, H. W., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications", pp.120~133 (2008), Edward Elgar
  18. Richardson, H. W., "Natural Disaster Analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk Assessment, Economic Impacts and Social Implications" (2008), Edward Elgar
  19. Report on Hurricane Katrina, "US House of Representatives", ~ (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)