공학계열 졸업생의 직무역량에 관한 인식 연구
A Study on the Perception about the Job Competency of Engineering graduates
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study was implemented for the purpose of analyzing the Job Competency level of accredited and non-accredited program’s graduates. And we were seeking way to manage realistic and effective way of Accreditation of Engineering education. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, survey and FGI were done. The study was: accredited program’s graduates thought more positively than non-accredited program’s graduates, and graduates felt that 11 Job Competencies Level of Work Performance were lower than the needs of job performance. The conclusions of this study were summarized as follows: First, between accredited and non-accredited program’s graduates, we could see significant recognition difference about the perception of the needs of job performance. This was because Design curriculum were reinforced and accredited program’s graduates had attended design program at accredited program. Second, accredited program’s graduates felt higher than non-accredited program’s graduates about the perception of level of work performance. This was because the efforts for curriculum reorganizing and teaching methods improvement were done. Third, we could not find significant recognition difference about the perception of the needs for job performance and work level. That was because accredited and non-accredited program were not dealed seperately. The conclusions of this study are summarized as follows: First, The efforts for analyzing job competence of industry and reflecting the program curriculum are needed on the accredited program for engineering education. Second, Government should make the incentive policy about the companies which give some merits to the accreditation graduates, and monitor constantly their real working. Third, in order that the accreditation results can be trustful on staff recruiting or school choosing, accreditation should make outcome-based-evaluation which guarantees competence of graduates.
Abstract
This study was implemented for the purpose of analyzing the Job Competency level of accredited and non-accredited program’s graduates. And we were seeking way to manage realistic and effective way of Accreditation of Engineering education. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, survey and FGI were done. The study was: accredited program’s graduates thought more positively than non-accredited program’s graduates, and graduates felt that 11 Job Competencies Level of Work Performance were lower than the needs of job performance. The conclusions of this study were summarized as follows: First, between accredited and non-accredited program’s graduates, we could see significant recognition difference about the perception of the needs of job performance. This was because Design curriculum were reinforced and accredited program’s graduates had attended design program at accredited program. Second, accredited program’s graduates felt higher than non-accredited program’s graduates about the perception of level of work performance. This was because the efforts for curriculum reorganizing and teaching methods improvement were done. Third, we could not find significant recognition difference about the perception of the needs for job performance and work level. That was because accredited and non-accredited program were not dealed seperately. The conclusions of this study are summarized as follows: First, The efforts for analyzing job competence of industry and reflecting the program curriculum are needed on the accredited program for engineering education. Second, Government should make the incentive policy about the companies which give some merits to the accreditation graduates, and monitor constantly their real working. Third, in order that the accreditation results can be trustful on staff recruiting or school choosing, accreditation should make outcome-based-evaluation which guarantees competence of graduates.
참고문헌 (25)
- 강소연, "공학교육인증제도 효과 분석 연구", 공학교육연구, 18(3), pp.59~68 (2015), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 김영욱, "인증이 자신의 전공과 동일분야취직에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" (2014), 한국공학교육학회
- 기정훈, "구조방정식을 통한 공학교육인증제도의 성과 분석:공학교육인증 프로그램 졸업생들의 인식조사를 중심으로", 한국정책연구, 11(3), pp.29~45 (2011), 경인행정학회
- 성지미, "공학인증 프로그램의 성과에 대한 조사연구", 공학교육연구, 12(4), pp.102~114 (2009), 한국공학교육학회
- 인증실효성 확보방안 연구, "송성진", 한국공학교육인증원, ~ (2011)
- 신승윤, "미국공학교육인증제도와 비교한 한국공학교육인증제도의 개선방안", 공학교육, 15(2), pp.37~40 (2008)
- 조성희, "공학교육인증평가가 교육과정에 미친 영향 연구", 공학교육연구, 15(4), pp.58~65 (2012), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 조옥경, "공학교육인증 평가체제의 메타평가 준거 개발", 공학교육연구, 16(3), pp.28~41 (2013), 한국공학교육학회
- 주재현, "공학교육인증제도의 효과성 평가: 공학교육인증 프로그램 졸업생들의 인식조사를 중심으로", 한국정책과학학회보, 14(3), pp.55~78 (2010), 한국정책과학학회
- 공학교육인증 성과 분석 보고서, "한국공학교육인증원", 한국공학교육증원, ~ (2009)
- 공학교육인증 성과분석 결과요약 보고서, "한국공학교육인증원", 한국공학교육인증원, ~ (2011)
- Boyatzis, A. S., "The competence manager" (1982), Wiley
- Dubois, D. D., "Competency-based performance improvement" (1993), HRD press
- Fletcher, S., "Management and Trainers" (1991), Kogan Page
- Hunter, J. E., "Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance", Psychological Bulletin, pp.72~98 (1984)
- Hunter, J. E., "Cognitive Ability, Cognitive Aptitudes, Job Knowledge, and Job Performance", Journal of Vocational Behavior, pp.340~362 (1986)
- Klemp, G. O., "Report to the national institute of education" (1980), Mcber and Co
- McClelland, D. C., "Testing for competence rather than for intelligence", American Psychologist, 28(1), pp.1~14 (1973)
- McLagen, P. A, "The ASTD Training and Development Competency Study, A Model Building Challenge", Training and Development Journal
- Parry, S. R., "The Quest for Competencies", Training, 33(7), pp.48~56 (1996)
- Schimidt, F. L., "Handbook of Industrial, Work &Organizational Psychology, 1" (2001)
- Spady, W. G., "Encyclopedia of Education", pp.1827~1831 (2003), MacMillan Reference Books
- Spencer, L., "Competence at Work:Models for Superior Performance" (1993), John Wiley and Sons, Inc
- White, R., "Motivation reconsidered, The concept of competence", Psychological Review, 66(1), pp.279~333 (1959)
- "한국공학교육인증원"[URL]