본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Discrepancies and Validation of Ethanol Level Determination with Osmolar Gap Formula in Patients with Suspected Acute Poisoning

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: Osmolar gap (OG) has been used for decades to screen for toxic alcohol levels. However, its reliability may vary due to several reasons. We validated the estimated ethanol concentration formula for patients with suspected poisoning and who visited the emergency department. We examined discrepancies in the ethanol level and patient characteristics by applying this formula when it was used to screen for intoxication due to toxic levels of alcohol. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 153 emergency department cases to determine the measured levels of toxic ethanol ingestion and we calculated alcohol ingestion using a formula based on serum osmolality. Those patients who were subjected to simultaneous measurements of osmolality, sodium, urea, glucose, and ethanol were included in this study. Patients with exposure to other toxic alcohols (methanol, ethylene glycol, or isopropanol) or poisons that affect osmolality were excluded. OG (the measured-calculated serum osmolality) was used to determine the calculated ethanol concentration. Results: Among the 153 included cases, 114 had normal OGs (OG≤14 mOsm/kg), and 39 cases had elevated OGs (OG>14). The mean difference between the measured and estimated (calculated ethanol using OG) ethanol concentration was -9.8 mg/dL. The 95% limits of agreement were -121.1 and 101.5 mg/dL, and the correlation coefficient R was 0.7037. For the four subgroups stratified by comorbidities and poisoning, the correlation coefficients R were 0.692, 0.588, 0.835, and 0.412, respectively, and the mean differences in measurement between the measured and calculated ethanol levels were -2.4 mg/dL, -48.8 mg/dL, 9.4 mg/dL, and -4.7 mg/dL, respectively. The equation plots had wide limits of agreement. Conclusion: We found that there were some discrepancies between OGs and the calculated ethanol concentrations. Addition of a correction factor for unmeasured osmoles to the equation of the calculated serum osmolality would help mitigate these discrepancies.

Abstract

Purpose: Osmolar gap (OG) has been used for decades to screen for toxic alcohol levels. However, its reliability may vary due to several reasons. We validated the estimated ethanol concentration formula for patients with suspected poisoning and who visited the emergency department. We examined discrepancies in the ethanol level and patient characteristics by applying this formula when it was used to screen for intoxication due to toxic levels of alcohol. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 153 emergency department cases to determine the measured levels of toxic ethanol ingestion and we calculated alcohol ingestion using a formula based on serum osmolality. Those patients who were subjected to simultaneous measurements of osmolality, sodium, urea, glucose, and ethanol were included in this study. Patients with exposure to other toxic alcohols (methanol, ethylene glycol, or isopropanol) or poisons that affect osmolality were excluded. OG (the measured-calculated serum osmolality) was used to determine the calculated ethanol concentration. Results: Among the 153 included cases, 114 had normal OGs (OG≤14 mOsm/kg), and 39 cases had elevated OGs (OG>14). The mean difference between the measured and estimated (calculated ethanol using OG) ethanol concentration was -9.8 mg/dL. The 95% limits of agreement were -121.1 and 101.5 mg/dL, and the correlation coefficient R was 0.7037. For the four subgroups stratified by comorbidities and poisoning, the correlation coefficients R were 0.692, 0.588, 0.835, and 0.412, respectively, and the mean differences in measurement between the measured and calculated ethanol levels were -2.4 mg/dL, -48.8 mg/dL, 9.4 mg/dL, and -4.7 mg/dL, respectively. The equation plots had wide limits of agreement. Conclusion: We found that there were some discrepancies between OGs and the calculated ethanol concentrations. Addition of a correction factor for unmeasured osmoles to the equation of the calculated serum osmolality would help mitigate these discrepancies.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Garrard A, "Validation of a pre-existing formula to calculate the contribution of ethanol to the osmolar gap", Clin Toxicol(Phila), 50, pp.562~566 (2012)
  2. Hovda KE, "Anion and osmolal gaps in the diagnosis of methanol poisoning : clinical study in 28 patients", Intensive Care Med, 30, pp.1842~1846 (2004)
  3. Choy KW, "Harmonisation of Osmolal Gap - Can We Use a Common Formula?", Clin Biochem Rev, 37, pp.113~119 (2016)
  4. Osterloh JD, "Discrepancies in osmolal gaps and calculated alcohol concentrations", Arch Pathol Lab Med, 120, pp.637~641 (1996)
  5. Purssell RA, "Derivation and validation of a formula to calculate the contribution of ethanol to the osmolal gap", Ann Emerg Med, 38, pp.653~659 (2001)
  6. Khajuria A, "Osmolality revisited--deriving and validating the best formula for calculated osmolality", Clin Biochem, 38, pp.514~519 (2005)
  7. Lepeytre F, "Formulas for calculated osmolarity and osmolal gap : a study of diagnostic accuracy", Am J Kidney Dis, 70, pp.347~356 (2017)
  8. Krasowski MD, "A retrospective analysis of glycol and toxic alcohol ingestion : utility of anion and osmolal gaps", BMC Clin Pathol, 12, pp.1~ (2012)
  9. Lynd LD, "An evaluation of the osmole gap as a screening test for toxic alcohol poisoning", BMC Emerg Med, 8, pp.5~ (2008)
  10. Siervo M, "Accuracy of prediction equations for serum osmolarity in frail older people with and without diabetes", Am J Clin Nutr, 100, pp.867~876 (2014)
  11. 이대욱, "안구통증을 동반한 두통환자를 대상으로 Tono-pen을 이용한 안압 측정의 유용성에 관한 연구", 대한응급의학회지, 20(2), pp.210~214 (2009), 대한응급의학회
  12. Heavens KR, "Validation of equations used to predict plasma osmolality in a healthy adult cohort", Am J Clin Nutr, 100, pp.1252~1256 (2014)
  13. Geller RJ, "Serum osmolal gap and ethanol concentration : a simple and accurate formula", J Toxicol Clin Toxicol, 24, pp.77~84 (1986)
  14. Carstairs SD, "Contribution of serum ethanol concentration to the osmol gap : a prospective volunteer study", Clin Toxicol (Phila), 51, pp.398~401 (2013)
  15. Purssell RA, "The use of the osmole gap as a screening test for the presence of exogenous substances", Toxicol Rev, 23, pp.189~202 (2004)
  16. Glaser DS, "Utility of the serum osmol gap in the diagnosis of methanol or ethylene glycol ingestion", Ann Emerg Med, 27, pp.343~346 (1996)
  17. Snyder H, "Accuracy of blood ethanol determination using serum osmolality", J Emerg Med, 10, pp.129~133 (1992)
  18. Davidson DF, "Excess osmolal gap in diabetic ketoacidosis explained", Clin Chem, 38, pp.755~757 (1992)
  19. 장형우, "외상 환자와 비외상 환자에서 삼투압차와 에탄올 농도의 상관관계 및 추정 에탄올 농도의 정확도", 대한외상학회지, 22(2), pp.148~153 (2009), 대한외상학회

관련 논문AI추천

Characteristics of Acute Toxic Alcohol Poisoning Patients in the Emergency Department: A Toxicological Laboratory Analysis of Ethylene Glycol and Methanol고정인, 김미숙, 김윤희, 박민경, 오범진, 이아름, 응급취약지 지역협력팀대한임상독성학회 · 대한임상독성학회지2025 · 제23권 제1호급성 독성 알코올 중독에 대한 후향적 분석강수, 김진, 안태규, 이유진대한임상독성학회 · 대한임상독성학회지2023 · 제21권 제2호Prognostic Value of Blood Lactate for Mortality of Acutely Poisoned Patients in Emergency Department강문주, 김용환, 김혜란, 이동우, 이준호, 조광원, 황성연대한임상독성학회 · 대한임상독성학회지2016 · 제14권 제1호의도적인 중독 환자들의 음주 여부에 따른 중독 중증도 지수의 비교강수, 안태규, 전민재대한임상독성학회 · 대한임상독성학회지2021 · 제19권 제1호The Significance of the Strong Ion Gap in Predicting Acute Kidney Injury and In-hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Poisoning박정배, 서강석, 심태진, 이미진, 정해원, 조재완대한임상독성학회 · 대한임상독성학회지2021 · 제19권 제2호Clinical features related to alcohol co-ingestion of deliberate self-poisoning patients visiting the emergency department김규원, 김대희, 김상윤, 우선희, 이운정, 이준영, 정시경, 홍성엽대한임상독성학회 · 대한임상독성학회지2022 · 제20권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)