Development and Application of SATEEC L Module for Slope Length Adjustment Based on Topography Change
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Severe sediment-laden problem has been the hot issue in Korea. It was assumed that agricultural activities and landslides were the primary causes of these problems in watersheds. The USLE-based systems have been widely used in soil erosion studies. However the GIS-based USLE modeling system has limitation in USLE L factors. In this study, the SATEEC L module was developed to reflect the slope length segmentations in the fields. The SATEEC L module was applied to the study watershed to analyze the effects of using the SATEEC L module on estimated sediment. As shown in the comparisons between SATEEC estimated sediment with SWAT values, the SATEEC GA-SDR module derives the SDR with reasonably acceptable accuracies. However, it is worthy to note that the soil erosion using the SATEEC L module for the study watershed was lower than that without using the SATEEC L module by 25%, although the SATEEC estimated sediment values with and without using L module match the SWAT sediment values with similar accuracies. This is because the SATEEC GA-SDR module estimates lower SDR in case of greater soil erosion estimation without the L module and greater SDR in case of lower soil erosion estimation with the L module. This indicates that the SATEEC input parameters, especially L factor, need to be prepared with care for accurate estimation of SDR at a watershed scale and for accurate evaluation of BMPs in the watershed.
Abstract
Severe sediment-laden problem has been the hot issue in Korea. It was assumed that agricultural activities and landslides were the primary causes of these problems in watersheds. The USLE-based systems have been widely used in soil erosion studies. However the GIS-based USLE modeling system has limitation in USLE L factors. In this study, the SATEEC L module was developed to reflect the slope length segmentations in the fields. The SATEEC L module was applied to the study watershed to analyze the effects of using the SATEEC L module on estimated sediment. As shown in the comparisons between SATEEC estimated sediment with SWAT values, the SATEEC GA-SDR module derives the SDR with reasonably acceptable accuracies. However, it is worthy to note that the soil erosion using the SATEEC L module for the study watershed was lower than that without using the SATEEC L module by 25%, although the SATEEC estimated sediment values with and without using L module match the SWAT sediment values with similar accuracies. This is because the SATEEC GA-SDR module estimates lower SDR in case of greater soil erosion estimation without the L module and greater SDR in case of lower soil erosion estimation with the L module. This indicates that the SATEEC input parameters, especially L factor, need to be prepared with care for accurate estimation of SDR at a watershed scale and for accurate evaluation of BMPs in the watershed.
참고문헌 (21)
- Brown,L.R., "Conserving soils In State of the World", pp.53~75 (1984), Norton
- Wischmeier, W.H., "Predicting rainfall erosion losses. A guide to conservation planning" (1978)
- USDA water erosion prediction project: hillslope profile and watershed model documentation, "Flanagan, D.C.", USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory, ~, pp.NSERL Report No. 10 (1995)
- Arnold, J. G., "Large are hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: model development", Journal of American Water Resources Association, 34(1), pp.73~89 (1998)
- Morgan, R.P.C., "The European Soil Erosion Model (EUROSEM): a dynamic approach for predicting sediment transport from fields and small catchments", Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 23, pp.527~544 (1998)
- Yitayew, M., "Using GIS for facilitating erosion estimation", Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 15(4), pp.295~301 (1999)
- Ouyang, D., "Web-based GIS application for soil erosion prediction", An International Symposium-Soil Erosion Research for the 21st Century (2001)
- Lufafa, A., "Prediction of soil erosion in a Lake Victoria basin catchment using a GIS-based universal soil loss model", Agricultural Systems, 76, pp.883~894 (2003)
- Lim, K. J., "GIS-based sediment assessment tool", CATENA, 64, pp.61~80 (2005)
- Park, Y. S, "Development of New R, C and SDR Modules for the SATEEC GIS System" (2009)
- Foster, G.R., "RUSLE User's Guide", Soil and Water Cons. Soc., ~ (1996)
- Williams, J. R., "Sediment routing for agricultural watersheds", Water Resour.Bull., 11(5), pp.965~974 (1975)
- Ouyang, D., "Predicting Sediment Devery Ratio in Saginaw Bay Watershed", the 22nd National Association of Environmental Professionals Conference (1997)
- Boyce, R. C., "Sediment Routing with Sediment Delivery Ratios. In: Present and Prospective Technology for ARS" (1975), USDA
- USDA, "Sediment Source, Yileds, and Delivery Ratios, National Engineering Handbook, Section 3 sediment", ~ (1972)
- Sedimentation Engineering, Manual and Report, "Vanoni, V. A.", American Society of Civil Engineers, ~, pp.Manual and Report No. 54 (1975)
- Williams, J. R., "Sediment Yield Prediction Based on Watershed Hydrology", Trans. of the ASAE, 20, pp.1100~1104 (1977)
- Holland, J.H., "Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems", pp.183~ (1975), University of Michigan Press
- Moore, I., "Physical Basis of the Length-Slope Factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation", Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50, pp.1294~1298 (1986)
- Moore, I, "Modeling Erosion and Deposition: Topographic Effects", Trans. of the ASAE, 29(6), pp.1624~1640 (1986)
- Nash, J. E., "River flow forecasting through conceptual models, Part I - A discussion of principles", J. Hydrol., 10, pp.282~290 (1970)