본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

SWAT과 SATEEC 모형을 이용한 토양유실량 비교

Comparison of Soil Loss Estimation using SWAT and SATEEC

2

조회

0

다운로드

12

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

Soil erosion is a natural process and has been occurring in most areas in the watershed. However, accelerated soil erosion rates have been causing numerous environmental impacts in recent years. To reduce soil erosion and sediment inflow into the water bodies, site-specific soil erosion best management practices (BMPs) need to be established and implemented. The most commonly used soil erosion model is the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), which have been used in many countries over 30 years. The Sediment Assessment Tool for Effective Erosion Control (SATEEC) ArcView GIS system has been developed and enhanced to estimate the soil erosion and sediment yield from the watershed using the USLE input data. In the last decade, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model also has been widely used to estimate soil erosion and sediment yield at a watershed scale. The SATEEC system estimates the LS factor using the equation suggested by Moore and Burch, while the SWAT model estimates the LS factor based on the relationship between sub watershed average slope and slope length. Thus the SATEEC and SWAT estimated soil erosion values were compared in this study. The differences in LS factor estimation methods in the SATEEC and SWAT caused significant difference in estimated soil erosion. In this study, the difference was -51.9%(default threshold)~-54.5%(min. threshold) between SATEEC and non-patched SWAT, and -7.8%(default threshold)~+3.8%(min. threshold) between SATEEC and patched SWAT estimated soil erosion.

Abstract

Soil erosion is a natural process and has been occurring in most areas in the watershed. However, accelerated soil erosion rates have been causing numerous environmental impacts in recent years. To reduce soil erosion and sediment inflow into the water bodies, site-specific soil erosion best management practices (BMPs) need to be established and implemented. The most commonly used soil erosion model is the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE), which have been used in many countries over 30 years. The Sediment Assessment Tool for Effective Erosion Control (SATEEC) ArcView GIS system has been developed and enhanced to estimate the soil erosion and sediment yield from the watershed using the USLE input data. In the last decade, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model also has been widely used to estimate soil erosion and sediment yield at a watershed scale. The SATEEC system estimates the LS factor using the equation suggested by Moore and Burch, while the SWAT model estimates the LS factor based on the relationship between sub watershed average slope and slope length. Thus the SATEEC and SWAT estimated soil erosion values were compared in this study. The differences in LS factor estimation methods in the SATEEC and SWAT caused significant difference in estimated soil erosion. In this study, the difference was -51.9%(default threshold)~-54.5%(min. threshold) between SATEEC and non-patched SWAT, and -7.8%(default threshold)~+3.8%(min. threshold) between SATEEC and patched SWAT estimated soil erosion.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 김기성, "홍천군 산지농업지대의 토양침식취약성 분석", 농촌계획, 11(3), pp.51~57 (2005), 한국농촌계획학회
  2. 박윤식, "임하댐 유역의 유사 거동 모의를 위한 SWAT 모델의 적용성 평가", 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 23(4), pp.467~473 (2007), 한국물환경학회
  3. 유동선, "SATEEC 시스템을 이용한 객토 토양의 토성고려에 따른 도암댐 유역의 토양유실 및 유사량 분석", 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 23(4), pp.518~526 (2007), 한국물환경학회
  4. "SATEEC 시스템의 개발"[URL]
  5. "SWAT ArcView GIS Extension Patch 개발"[URL]
  6. 정영상, "강원도 경사지 토양 유실예측용 신 USLE의 적용을 위한 강수 인자와 토양 침식성인자의 검토", 한국토양비료학회지, 32(1), pp.31~38 (1999)
  7. 정영상, "경사지 토양의 침식인자에 관하여", 한국토양비료학회지, 9(2), pp.107~113 (1976)
  8. 정필균, "토양유실량 예측을 위한 작부인자 검토", 한국토양비료학회지, 18(1), pp.7~13 (1985)
  9. 허성구, , 농촌계획학회지, 11(4), pp.67~74 (2005)
  10. 허성구, "소유역 구분이 SWAT 예측치에 미치는 영향 평가", 한국관개배수학회지, 13(2), pp.55~62 (2006)
  11. Arnold, J. G., "Automated methods for estimating baseflow and ground water recharge from streamflow records", Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35(2), pp.411~424 (1999)
  12. Foster, G. R., "User's Guide" (1996), & Water Cons. Soc.
  13. Haan, C. T., "Design Hydrology and Sedimentology for Small Catchments" (1994), Academic Press
  14. Lim, K. J., "GIS-based sediment assessment tool", pp.61~80 (2005)
  15. Moore, I., "Physical Basis of the Length-Slope Factor in the Universal Soil Loss Equation", Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50, pp.1294~1298 (1986)
  16. Moore, I., "Modeling Erosion and Deposition", Effects. Trans. of the ASAE, 29(6), pp.1624~1640 (1986)
  17. Renard K. G., "Predicting Soil Erosion by Water, A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE)" (1997)
  18. Williams, J. R., "Sediment Yield Prediction with Universal Equation using Runoff Energy Factor", pp.244~252 (1975)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)