고가 및 희귀 의약품의 급여 절차 및 관리
Review of Benefit Processes for High-Cost, Orphan Drugs
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The objective of this study is to understand current status of benefit processes of high-cost, orphan drugs which have uncertainties in financial and clinical evidence for patient access. In Korea, the indispensable drug program, risk sharing agreement (RSA), and cost-effectiveness exemption drugs program have been launched for assure treatment of patients in life threatening conditions without alternatives. Australia has RSA and Life Saving Drug Program (LSDP) for similar patients and drugs. UK has Patient Access Scheme (PAS) and Cancer Drug Fund (CDF). Canada has Exceptional Access Program (EAP) and Drugs for Rare Diseases (DRD) by each province. When we compare the drugs which are under the three special processes in Korea with other three countries, most of them are managed by RSA in Australia and UK. Especially, most of the drugs under the indispensable drug program in Korea, are managed by LSDP in Australia which is separate fund from pharmaceutical benefit scheme. UK also have CDF, separate fund from National Health Service, for evidence generation for high cost cancer drugs which show uncertainties at the point of decision making. From this comparison, we can have several implications for improve Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) processes for high cost, orphan drugs. Globally, the high cost, orphan drugs have been approaching for health care system adoption and managed entry scheme including risk sharing agreement has beed increasing for solving clinical and financial uncertainties. It needs to consider that this increasing of global RSA gives us the bigger uncertainty of prices we reference for the NHI decision making. In addition, the separate fund for high cost cancer drugs and orphan drugs during evidence generation to solve clinical and financial uncertainties.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to understand current status of benefit processes of high-cost, orphan drugs which have uncertainties in financial and clinical evidence for patient access. In Korea, the indispensable drug program, risk sharing agreement (RSA), and cost-effectiveness exemption drugs program have been launched for assure treatment of patients in life threatening conditions without alternatives. Australia has RSA and Life Saving Drug Program (LSDP) for similar patients and drugs. UK has Patient Access Scheme (PAS) and Cancer Drug Fund (CDF). Canada has Exceptional Access Program (EAP) and Drugs for Rare Diseases (DRD) by each province. When we compare the drugs which are under the three special processes in Korea with other three countries, most of them are managed by RSA in Australia and UK. Especially, most of the drugs under the indispensable drug program in Korea, are managed by LSDP in Australia which is separate fund from pharmaceutical benefit scheme. UK also have CDF, separate fund from National Health Service, for evidence generation for high cost cancer drugs which show uncertainties at the point of decision making. From this comparison, we can have several implications for improve Korean National Health Insurance (NHI) processes for high cost, orphan drugs. Globally, the high cost, orphan drugs have been approaching for health care system adoption and managed entry scheme including risk sharing agreement has beed increasing for solving clinical and financial uncertainties. It needs to consider that this increasing of global RSA gives us the bigger uncertainty of prices we reference for the NHI decision making. In addition, the separate fund for high cost cancer drugs and orphan drugs during evidence generation to solve clinical and financial uncertainties.
참고문헌 (34)
- Dolan P, "QALY maximisation and people’s preferences : a methodological review of the literature", Health Econ, 14, pp.197~208 (2005)
- 배그린, "한국, 호주, 캐나다, 영국의 항암제 및 희귀의약품의 접근성에 대한 고찰", 보건경제와 정책연구, 20(2), pp.1~20 (2014), 한국보건경제정책학회
- "hira.or.kr"[URL]
- "nhis.or.kr"[URL]
- "mohw.go.kr"[URL]
- 위험분담제 적용 약제의 사후관리 방안 등 연구, "이태진", Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, ~ (2016)
- "law.go.kr"[URL]
- "hira.or.kr"[URL]
- "hira.or.kr"[URL]
- 외국약가 참조기준 개선방안 연구, "장선미", Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service, ~ (2019)
- Bae EY, "Positive list system in Korea: issues and challenges", J Health Tech Assess, 1, pp.43~50 (2013)
- Robinson MF, "Characteristics of managed entry agreements in Australia", Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 34, pp.46~55 (2018)
- Vitry A, "Managed entry agreements for pharmaceuticals in Australia", Health Policy, 117, pp.345~352 (2014)
- Tuffaha HW, "The Australian managed entry scheme : are we getting it right", Pharmacoeconomics, 36, pp.555~565 (2018)
- 박실비아, "Life saving drugs program of Australia", Health and Welfare Forum, 4, pp.78~88 (2014)
- "health.gov.au"[URL]
- 기등재 약제의 비용효과성 및 비용효과성에 근거한 사후관리방안 연구, "안정훈", National Evidence-based healthcare Collaborating Agency, ~ (2015)
- "pbs.gov.au"[URL]
- "au.gsk.com"[URL]
- 의료기술평가제도의 국제 비교연구, "김수경", 한국보건의료연구원, 1~342 (2015)
- "raps.org"[URL]
- "publications.gc.ca"[URL]
- Bourassa Forcier M, "Product listing agreements(PLAs) : a new tool for reaching Quebec’s pharmaceutical policy objectives", Healthc Policy, 9, pp.65~75 (2013)
- "cadth.ca"[URL]
- "odano.ca"[URL]
- "cadth.ca"[URL]
- 희귀질환 치료 의약품 별도 기금 제도 고찰 및 시사점, "김동숙", 53~60 (2017)
- 김유진, "의약품 접근성 향상을 위한 방안 고찰", 한국임상약학회지, 28(1), pp.40~50 (2018), 한국임상약학회[DOI]
- "gov.uk"[URL]
- "ice.org.uk"[URL]
- "england.nhs.uk"[URL]
- "nice.org.uk"[URL]
- "lpp.nhs.uk"[URL]
- "health.gov.on.ca"[URL]
