희귀질환 약제, 항암제 별도 기금 도입에 대한 약제급여 결정 전문가와 이해관계자 시각
The Opinion of Experts and Stakeholder on Introduction of Orphan or Anticancer Drugs Funding Program
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background & objective: The Korean government has expanded its benefit coverage to enhance patients' access to orphan drugs and cancer medicines. However, the number of new drugs whose indications were not applied to reimbursement in health insurance was increased. This study aimed to understand the perspectives of experts and various stakeholders on the introduction of a new funding program for cancer treatment and orphan drugs. Methods: We conducted email surveys comprising 19 questions, from September 9 to 26, 2016. We distributed questionnaires to members of the Pharmaceutical Benefit Appraisal Committee and Cancer Assessment Committee. We also conducted a qualitative study through group interviews with stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies and some patient groups for diseases. Results: A total of 35 survey respondents recommended the introduction of a funding program for orphan drugs, whereas 66% recommended the launch of funding for anticancer drugs. In addition, most pharmaceutical companies and patient groups recommended the introduction of new funding programs targeting patients with cancer and rare diseases. However, some participants asserted that it would be more appropriate to modify the existing reimbursement scheme than launch new funding. Conclusion: This study concluded that introducing new funding needs a social consensus to relieve financial hardships at the patient level.
Abstract
Background & objective: The Korean government has expanded its benefit coverage to enhance patients' access to orphan drugs and cancer medicines. However, the number of new drugs whose indications were not applied to reimbursement in health insurance was increased. This study aimed to understand the perspectives of experts and various stakeholders on the introduction of a new funding program for cancer treatment and orphan drugs. Methods: We conducted email surveys comprising 19 questions, from September 9 to 26, 2016. We distributed questionnaires to members of the Pharmaceutical Benefit Appraisal Committee and Cancer Assessment Committee. We also conducted a qualitative study through group interviews with stakeholders, including pharmaceutical companies and some patient groups for diseases. Results: A total of 35 survey respondents recommended the introduction of a funding program for orphan drugs, whereas 66% recommended the launch of funding for anticancer drugs. In addition, most pharmaceutical companies and patient groups recommended the introduction of new funding programs targeting patients with cancer and rare diseases. However, some participants asserted that it would be more appropriate to modify the existing reimbursement scheme than launch new funding. Conclusion: This study concluded that introducing new funding needs a social consensus to relieve financial hardships at the patient level.
참고문헌 (15)
- Wagner AK, "Access to care and medicines, burden of health care expenditures, and risk protection: Results from the World Health Survey", Health Policy, 100(2-3), pp.151~158 (2011)
- "All of medical not covered treatment will be applied to health insurance" (2017)[URL]
- "Treatment on cancer, cardiology, cerebrovascular, and orphan disease will be resolved using health insurance" (2013)[URL]
- "Expansion of health insurance coverage for medicines of four diseases" (2013)[URL]
- "Health Insurance Benefit Criteria of Pharmaceuticals" (2019)[URL]
- 김다은, "암 경험자의 생존단계별 필요에 관한 질적 연구", 보건사회연구, 39(4), pp.356~395 (2019), 한국보건사회연구원[DOI]
- "The issue analysis report of 2019 Parliamentary audit" (2020)[URL]
- "About the PBS"[URL]
- "Life Saving Drugs Program (LSDP) Program-Life Saving Drugs Program Criteria and Conditions"[URL]
- Optimization of the operational processes of the Special Solidarity Fund, "Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE)", KCE, ~, pp.KCE reports 133C (2010)
- "About the NHS"[URL]
- "Cancer Drugs Fund"[URL]
- 정승연, "주요 외국의 희귀의약품과 항암제 별도 기금 제도 고찰 및 시사점", 약 학 회 지, 61(2), pp.100~108 (2017), 대한약학회
- 김동숙, "의약품 급여기준 외 사용에 대한 본인부담 경감방안 도입 타당성에 대한 전문가 의견 조사 결과", 보건경제와 정책연구, 23(2), pp.17~35 (2017), 한국보건경제정책학회
- Colaizzi PF, "Existential phenomenological alternatives for psychology", pp.48~71 (1978), Oxford University Press
