본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

시험 · 검사방법의 유효성 검증 방법 비교

Comparison of Method Validation for Test and Inspections

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

One of the most important purposes of a validation method is to verify whether a test method is suitable for the purpose of the test. In this study, validation parameters that are used by national and international institutes for test and inspection bodies are classified. As a result of classifying these general factors, method validation parameters were performed, including the following cases: ① the confirmation of a new test method, ② comparison between a non-standardized test method and standardized method, ③confirmation of a test method needing such extensions as a test method verification, verification of the test method applied between other test institutes or analysts, ④ verification of the required similarity between test methods, and ⑤ revalidation of the previously verified test methods. The general parameters applied in the validation processes were classified as follows; specificity, selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, detection limit uncertainty, quantitative limit, and range. By a comparison of the validation guidelines or guideline parameters applied by the test and inspection bodies, the survey results were considered to be useful in preparing validation guidelines for environmental testing and inspection methods.

Abstract

One of the most important purposes of a validation method is to verify whether a test method is suitable for the purpose of the test. In this study, validation parameters that are used by national and international institutes for test and inspection bodies are classified. As a result of classifying these general factors, method validation parameters were performed, including the following cases: ① the confirmation of a new test method, ② comparison between a non-standardized test method and standardized method, ③confirmation of a test method needing such extensions as a test method verification, verification of the test method applied between other test institutes or analysts, ④ verification of the required similarity between test methods, and ⑤ revalidation of the previously verified test methods. The general parameters applied in the validation processes were classified as follows; specificity, selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, detection limit uncertainty, quantitative limit, and range. By a comparison of the validation guidelines or guideline parameters applied by the test and inspection bodies, the survey results were considered to be useful in preparing validation guidelines for environmental testing and inspection methods.

참고문헌 (7)

  1. ISO, "17025:2005 General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories", ~
  2. KOLAS, "화학적 시험방법의 유효성 확인을 위한 지침" (2012)
  3. 품의약품안전청, "의약품등 시험방법 검증 가이드 라인 적용을 위한 해설서", ~ (2012)
  4. EPA, "Guidance on Environmental Data Verification and Data Validation" (2002)
  5. NATA, "Guidelines for the validation and verification of quantitative and qualitative test methods" (2013)
  6. "UK standards for microbiology investigations, issued by the standards unit, Microbiology Services", PHE, ~ (2011)
  7. Eurachem, "the Fitness for Purpose of Analytical Methods - A Laboratory Guide to Method Validation and Related Topics" (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

환경분야 시험 · 검사방법의 유효성 검증 기법 연구고상호, 김금희, 김명옥, 김명진, 김지혜, 유은진, 윤숙희, 이신우, 이진주, 임보라, 정현미, 최종우, 허유정, 홍석영, 황종연한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2018 · 제21권 제2호분석법 유효성 확인의 이해와 분야 별 가이드라인 비교노종성, 명승운한국분석과학회 · 분석과학2024 · 제37권 제3호환경분야 시험 · 검사기관의 정도관리 현장평가결과 고찰고상호, 김명진, 김지혜, 박현우, 이경로, 이수영, 이진주, 이혜리, 전수아, 정현미, 최성헌, 최종우, 허유정, 홍석영, 황종연한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2019 · 제22권 제4호임상검사실에서의 액체크로마토그래피-질량분석을 위한 권고안: 제2편. 검사법 검증김세림, 문수영, 박형두, 송상훈, 이경훈, 이상국, 이수연, 최현정대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2020 · 제10권 제2호수질연속자동측정기의 상대정확도 적합성 및 유효성 연구김상윤, 김승열, 최종우, 추용엽한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2013 · 제16권 제2호환경분야 시험 · 검사기관 현장평가 결과 분석고상호, 김지혜, 박창희, 이경로, 이진주, 이혜리, 전수아, 정현미, 최종우, 황종연한국환경분석학회 · 환경분석과 독성보건2020 · 제23권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)