수질연속자동측정기의 상대정확도 적합성 및 유효성 연구
Suitability and Effectiveness of Relative Accuracy for Continuous Water Quality Measuring System
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As a step to improve relative accuracy test for continuous water monitoring equipment (CWMS) and to respond to consolidated effluent limitation guideline for the effluents discharged to surface water and municipal sewage treatment plant, this study proposes scientifically proven and reasonable methods for relative accuracy test. The current relative accuracy test of the performance standards for CWMS does not accurately reflect accuracy of the equipment especially tested by water samples containing low contents of target analytes. This study focuses on accuracy test and proposes new accuracy test methods considering minimum detectable level (MDL) and effluent characteristics through the comparison of standards of MCERTs, JIS and ISO. MCERTs suggested 10% of standard reference methods as performance standard when the measured reading value is above 0.5 mg/L. Otherwise it applies ± 0.05 mg/L. Therefore, this study sets up suitable percent (%) area of standard reference methods over item specific standard and decides special value considering percent of main test method (corresponding suitable area) error as suitable standard of error. This study presents improvement suggestion 20% of current standard, 10% of UK and Japan and 15% of standard considering domestic conditions as percent (%) of main test method and suggests suitability and effectiveness of the results of the performance standards.
Abstract
As a step to improve relative accuracy test for continuous water monitoring equipment (CWMS) and to respond to consolidated effluent limitation guideline for the effluents discharged to surface water and municipal sewage treatment plant, this study proposes scientifically proven and reasonable methods for relative accuracy test. The current relative accuracy test of the performance standards for CWMS does not accurately reflect accuracy of the equipment especially tested by water samples containing low contents of target analytes. This study focuses on accuracy test and proposes new accuracy test methods considering minimum detectable level (MDL) and effluent characteristics through the comparison of standards of MCERTs, JIS and ISO. MCERTs suggested 10% of standard reference methods as performance standard when the measured reading value is above 0.5 mg/L. Otherwise it applies ± 0.05 mg/L. Therefore, this study sets up suitable percent (%) area of standard reference methods over item specific standard and decides special value considering percent of main test method (corresponding suitable area) error as suitable standard of error. This study presents improvement suggestion 20% of current standard, 10% of UK and Japan and 15% of standard considering domestic conditions as percent (%) of main test method and suggests suitability and effectiveness of the results of the performance standards.
참고문헌 (16)
- 환경부·환경관리공단, "수질TMS 설치·운영 업무편람", ~ (2009)
- "수질 및 수생태계 보전에 관한 법률", ~
- , 2012
- 환경측정기기의 형식승인·정도검사 등에관한 고시, "국립환경과학원", ~ (2012)
- "Performance Standards and Test Procedures for Continuous Water Monitoring Equipment – part 2 Performance standards and test procedures for on-line monitors ver 3.1", ~ (2010)
- Test, "QA plan for Verification of Nutrient Analyzers at a Wastewater Treatment Plant", ETV Program Advanced Monitoring Systems Center, 2005
- Test, "QA plan for Long-Term Deployment of Multiparameter water quality probes", sondes, pp.2002, ~
- JIS, "JIS K 0808 Automatic total nitrogen analyzer", ~ (2008)
- JIS, , JIS K 0809 Automatic total phosphorus analyzer, ~ (2008)
- 환경부, "수질오염공정시험기준", ~ (2011)
- 기술표준원, "KS A ISO 5725-1, 측정방법 및 측정결과의 정확도(진도 및 정밀도) 제1부: 일반적인 원리 및정의", ~ (2002)
- 기술표준원, "KS A ISO 5725-2, 측정방법 및 측정결과의 정확도(진도 및 정밀도) 제2부: 표준 측정방법의반복 정밀도 및 재현 정밀도를 구하기 위한 기본적 방법", ~ (2002)
- 폐수배출업소 오염물질 자동감시시스템 구축방안 수립을 위한 연구, "환경관리공단", ~ (2005)
- 이충열, "수질자동측정시스템에서 온라인 TOC 자동측정장치의 불확도 산출", 생태와 환경, 40(2), pp.193~200 (2007), 한국하천호수학회
- 변주대, "하수처리장 방류수 중 유기물 함량 지표로써 총유기탄소의 활용", 한국환경분석학회지, 13(2), pp.99~103 (2010), 한국환경분석학회
