본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

슐레겔(August W. Schlegel)의 셰익스피어 비평

August W. Schlegel’s Criticism of Shakespeare

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Critics in the neoclassical period criticized Shakespeare’s use of degenerating expressions, vulgar words, bombasts and his excessive use of puns. Furthermore, they criticized Shakespeare’s violation of the three unities and his lack of moral instruction or poetic justice. Their views of Shakespeare were limited by neoclassical principles. August W. Schlegel, the representative German critic of Shakespeare in the romantic period, defended Shakespeare’s disregard of the three unities, pointing out the negative aspects of the esthetic of delusion as Samuel Johnson did. He also defended Shakespeare’s “mingled drama,” and his defence was based on his belief that it is a more natural form of drama to exhibit the real state of a real world. Schlegel’s contribution to the understanding of Shakespeare’s originality lies in his theory of organic unity and imagination. In A Course of Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature, Schlegel wrote: “Organical form ... is innate; it unfolds itself from within, and acquires its determination contemporaneously with the perfect development of the germ.... All genuine forms are organical.” Schlegel believed in the power of imagination which can combine many things into one large whole to produce dramatic unity. Schlegel praised Shakespeare’s genius in keeping organic unity in his works and his way of representing the ultimate end of human feeling. For Schlegel, the proof of Shakespeare’s genius is in the creation of various vital characters who mirror each other in an organic form.

Abstract

Critics in the neoclassical period criticized Shakespeare’s use of degenerating expressions, vulgar words, bombasts and his excessive use of puns. Furthermore, they criticized Shakespeare’s violation of the three unities and his lack of moral instruction or poetic justice. Their views of Shakespeare were limited by neoclassical principles. August W. Schlegel, the representative German critic of Shakespeare in the romantic period, defended Shakespeare’s disregard of the three unities, pointing out the negative aspects of the esthetic of delusion as Samuel Johnson did. He also defended Shakespeare’s “mingled drama,” and his defence was based on his belief that it is a more natural form of drama to exhibit the real state of a real world. Schlegel’s contribution to the understanding of Shakespeare’s originality lies in his theory of organic unity and imagination. In A Course of Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature, Schlegel wrote: “Organical form ... is innate; it unfolds itself from within, and acquires its determination contemporaneously with the perfect development of the germ.... All genuine forms are organical.” Schlegel believed in the power of imagination which can combine many things into one large whole to produce dramatic unity. Schlegel praised Shakespeare’s genius in keeping organic unity in his works and his way of representing the ultimate end of human feeling. For Schlegel, the proof of Shakespeare’s genius is in the creation of various vital characters who mirror each other in an organic form.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 임한순, "독일의 셰익스피어 수용과 고전문학기 희곡의 발전", 독일문학, pp.1~30 (1996)
  2. 김종환, "코울리지의 셰익스피어 비평", Shakespeare Review, 41(2), pp.46~68 (2005), 한국셰익스피어학회
  3. Adler, J. H., "Johnson’s ‘He That Imagines This", SQ, 11, pp.225~228 (1960)
  4. Bate, W. J., "Criticism: The Major Texts" (1970), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
  5. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, "Shakespearean Criticism I, II" (1960), Dent
  6. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor, "Criticism: The Major Texts", pp.364~375 (1970), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
  7. Eastman, Arthur M, "A Short History of Shakespearean Criticism" (1974), Norton
  8. Greene, Donald, "Samuel Johnson" (1989), Twayne Pub.
  9. Hazlitt, William, "Characters of Shakespeare’s Plays" (1959), Oxford UP
  10. Johnson, Samuel, "Johnson on Shakespeare, The Yale edition of the works of Samuel Johnson, Vol. 7 & 8" (1968), Yale UP
  11. Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, "Selected Prose Works of G. E. Lessing" (1890), George Bell and Sons
  12. Mack, Maynard, "The World of Hamlet", The Yale Review, 41, pp.502~523 (1952)
  13. Orsini, G. N. G., "Coleridge and Schlegel Reconsidered", CL, 16(2), pp.100~119 (1964)
  14. Ralli, Augustus, "A History of Shakespearean Criticism. Vol. I" (1965), Humanities P
  15. Raysor, Thomas Middleton, "Shakespearean Criticism I, II" (1960), Dent
  16. Schlegel. August W, "A Course of Lectures on Dramatic Art and Literature" (1965), Ams P
  17. Voltaire, "Dramatic Theory and Criticism: Greek to Grotowski", pp.280~298 (1974), Holt Rinehart and Winston
  18. Wimsatt, William K. Jr, "Classical Criticism: A Short History" (1957), Routledge & Kegan Paul

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)