본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Reusability of EMR Data for Applying Cubbin and Jackson Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Scale in Critical Care Patients

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: The purposes of this study were to examine the predictive validity of the Cubbin and Jackson pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for the development of pressure ulcers in intensive care unit (ICU) patients retrospectively and to evaluate the reusability of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data. Methods: A retrospective design was used to examine 829 cases admitted to four ICUs in a tertiary care hospital from May 2010 to April 2011. Patients who were without pressure ulcers at admission to ICU, 18 years or older, and had stayed in ICU for 24 hours or longer were included. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: The reported incidence rate of pressure ulcers among the study subjects was 14.2%. At the cut-off score of 24 of the Cubbin and Jackson scale, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC were 72.0%, 68.8%, 27.7%, 93.7%, and 0.76, respectively. Eight items out 10 of the Cubbin and Jackson scale were readily available in the EMR data. Conclusions: The Cubbin and Jackson scale performed slightly better than the Braden scale to predict pressure ulcer development. Eight items of the Cubbin and Jackson scale except mobility and hygiene can be extracted from the EMR, which initially demonstrated the reusability of EMR data for pressure ulcer risk assessment. If the Cubbin and Jackson scale is a part of the EMR assessment form, it would help nurses perform tasks to effectively prevent pressure ulcers with an EMR alert for high-risk patients.

Abstract

Objectives: The purposes of this study were to examine the predictive validity of the Cubbin and Jackson pressure ulcer risk assessment scale for the development of pressure ulcers in intensive care unit (ICU) patients retrospectively and to evaluate the reusability of Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data. Methods: A retrospective design was used to examine 829 cases admitted to four ICUs in a tertiary care hospital from May 2010 to April 2011. Patients who were without pressure ulcers at admission to ICU, 18 years or older, and had stayed in ICU for 24 hours or longer were included. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. Results: The reported incidence rate of pressure ulcers among the study subjects was 14.2%. At the cut-off score of 24 of the Cubbin and Jackson scale, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC were 72.0%, 68.8%, 27.7%, 93.7%, and 0.76, respectively. Eight items out 10 of the Cubbin and Jackson scale were readily available in the EMR data. Conclusions: The Cubbin and Jackson scale performed slightly better than the Braden scale to predict pressure ulcer development. Eight items of the Cubbin and Jackson scale except mobility and hygiene can be extracted from the EMR, which initially demonstrated the reusability of EMR data for pressure ulcer risk assessment. If the Cubbin and Jackson scale is a part of the EMR assessment form, it would help nurses perform tasks to effectively prevent pressure ulcers with an EMR alert for high-risk patients.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Nijs N, "Incidence and risk factors for pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit", J Clin Nurs, 18(9), pp.1258~1266 (2009)
  2. "Preventing pressure ulcers in hospitals: a toolkit for improving quality of care" (2011)[URL]
  3. Bennett G, "The cost of pressure ulcers in the UK", Age Ageing, 33(3), pp.230~235 (2004)
  4. Hughes RG, "Patient safety and quality: an evidence-based handbook for nurses" (2008), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  5. Furukawa MF, "Electronic Medical Records, nurse staffing, and nurse-sensitive patient outcomes: evidence from the national database of nursing quality indicators", Med Care Res Rev, 68(3), pp.311~331 (2011)
  6. Bergquist-Beringer S, "The reliability of the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators pressure ulcer indicator: a triangulation approach", J Nurs Care Qual, 26(4), pp.292~301 (2011)
  7. Survey standards for healthcare accreditation, "Korea Institute for Healthcare Accreditation", Ministry of Health & Welfare, ~ (2011)
  8. Shahin ES, "Pressure ulcer prevalence in intensive care patients: a cross-sectional study", J Eval Clin Pract, 14(4), pp.563~568 (2008)
  9. Theaker C, "Pressure sore prevention in the critically ill: what you don't know, what you should know and why it’s important", Intensive Crit Care Nurs, 19(3), pp.163~168 (2003)
  10. Manzano F, "Pressure ulcer incidence and risk factors in ventilated intensive care patients", J Crit Care, 25(3), pp.469~476 (2010)
  11. Cremasco MF, "Pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit: the relationship between nursing workload, illness severity and pressure ulcer risk", J Clin Nurs, 22(15-16), pp.2183~2191 (2013)
  12. Bergstrom N, "The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk", Nurs Res, 36(4), pp.205~210 (1987)
  13. Cubbin B, "Trial of a pressure area risk calculator for intensive therapy patients", Intensive Care Nurs, 7(1), pp.40~44 (1991)
  14. Sousa B, "Translation, adaptation, and validation of the Sunderland Scale and the Cubbin & Jackson Revised Scale in Portuguese", Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, 25(2), pp.106~114 (2013)
  15. Boyle M, "Pressure sores in intensive care: defining their incidence and associated factors and assessing the utility of two pressure sore risk assessment tools", Aust Crit Care, 14(1), pp.24~30 (2001)
  16. Jun S, "Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale", Int J Nurs Stud, 41(2), pp.199~204 (2004)
  17. Cox J, "Predictors of pressure ulcers in adult critical care patients", Am J Crit Care, 20(5), pp.364~375 (2011)
  18. Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL, "Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review", J Adv Nurs, 54(1), pp.94~110 (2006)
  19. 조인숙, "욕창발생 예측도구 개발을 위한 전자간호기록데이터 이용 가능성", Healthcare Informatics Research, 14(2), pp.161~168 (2008), 대한의료정보학회
  20. 김현정, "폼매트리스 사용 중환자의 욕창발생위험군별 적정 체위변경시간", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 42(5), pp.730~737 (2012), 한국간호과학회
  21. Alderden J, "Risk profile characteristics associated with outcomes of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a retrospective review", Crit Care Nurse, 31(4), pp.30~43 (2011)
  22. Compton F, "Pressure ulcer predictors in ICU patients: nursing skin assessment versus objective parameters", J Wound Care, 17(10), pp.417~420 (2008)
  23. Curry K, "A prospective, descriptive study of characteristics associated with skin failure in critically ill adults", Ostomy Wound Manage, 58(5), pp.36~38 (2012)
  24. Brunk D, "Are pressure ulcers really a ‘Never Event’?", Chest Physician, 6(3), pp.6~ (2011)
  25. Schindler CA, "Protecting fragile skin: nursing interventions to decrease development of pressure ulcers in pediatric intensive care", Am J Crit Care, 20(1), pp.26~34 (2011)
  26. Hine K, "The use of physical restraint in critical care", Nurs Crit Care, 12(1), pp.6~11 (2007)
  27. 조인숙, "전자의무기록 데이터의 이차활용을 위한 구조화된 데이터 질에 대한 탐색", Healthcare Informatics Research, 15(4), pp.423~431 (2009), 대한의료정보학회
  28. Katsuhiko Takabayashi, "Japanese EMRs and IT in Medicine: Expansion, Integration, and Reuse of Data", Healthcare Informatics Research, 17(3), pp.178~183 (2011), 대한의료정보학회
  29. 김영아, "The Development of Medical Record Items: a User-centered, Bottom-up Approach", Healthcare Informatics Research, 18(1), pp.10~17 (2012), 대한의료정보학회
  30. 조인숙, "전자의무기록을 이용한 욕창발생 예측 베이지안 네트워크 모델 개발", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 41(3), pp.423~431 (2011), 한국간호과학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)