대만 변형근로시간 제도
Flexible Working Hours in Taiwan
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article examines the practice of flexible working hours in Taiwan including its historical background, type and substance, influence on employees, and so forth. The Labor Standard Law in Taiwan identifies three types of flexible working hours: 2-week, 8-week, and 4-week flexible working hours. According to the Labor Standard Law in Taiwan, a worker shall not have regular working time in excess of eight hours a day and eighty-four hours every two weeks. However, an employer may distribute the regular working hours of any two workdays in every two weeks to other workdays, provided that no more than two hours shall be distributed to each of the other workdays, but the total number of working hours shall not exceed forty-eight hours every week. An employer may distribute the regular working hours, within every eight weeks, provided that the regular working time does not exceed eight hours a day and the total number of working hours does not exceed forty-eight hours every week. An employer may also change working hours, as long as the distribution of regular working hours to other work days within a four-week period does not exceed two hours a day. The purpose of the flexible working hours system in Taiwan is not for the employee to choose her/his working hours; rather, it is for the employer to choose the employee's working hours so as to suit the employer's own business needs or demand. Therefore, such a system in practice can have a bad effect on an employee's health and life as a whole. Otherwise such a system, specifically the 2-week flexible working hours system, may bring the employee a chance to enjoy two full holidays per week. The Labor Standard Law provides that with the consent of the company's labor union -- or if there is no labor union in a business entity, the approval of a labor-management conference -- an employer may distribute the regular working hours to other workdays, thereby it tries to reduce the negative effects of this practice on the employee. However, the employee still faces drawbacks, in particular the reduction of overtime pay due to the extended working hours and threats to his/her health caused by the lengthy working time and intensive work specifically under the 4-week flexible working hours system.
Abstract
This article examines the practice of flexible working hours in Taiwan including its historical background, type and substance, influence on employees, and so forth. The Labor Standard Law in Taiwan identifies three types of flexible working hours: 2-week, 8-week, and 4-week flexible working hours. According to the Labor Standard Law in Taiwan, a worker shall not have regular working time in excess of eight hours a day and eighty-four hours every two weeks. However, an employer may distribute the regular working hours of any two workdays in every two weeks to other workdays, provided that no more than two hours shall be distributed to each of the other workdays, but the total number of working hours shall not exceed forty-eight hours every week. An employer may distribute the regular working hours, within every eight weeks, provided that the regular working time does not exceed eight hours a day and the total number of working hours does not exceed forty-eight hours every week. An employer may also change working hours, as long as the distribution of regular working hours to other work days within a four-week period does not exceed two hours a day. The purpose of the flexible working hours system in Taiwan is not for the employee to choose her/his working hours; rather, it is for the employer to choose the employee's working hours so as to suit the employer's own business needs or demand. Therefore, such a system in practice can have a bad effect on an employee's health and life as a whole. Otherwise such a system, specifically the 2-week flexible working hours system, may bring the employee a chance to enjoy two full holidays per week. The Labor Standard Law provides that with the consent of the company's labor union -- or if there is no labor union in a business entity, the approval of a labor-management conference -- an employer may distribute the regular working hours to other workdays, thereby it tries to reduce the negative effects of this practice on the employee. However, the employee still faces drawbacks, in particular the reduction of overtime pay due to the extended working hours and threats to his/her health caused by the lengthy working time and intensive work specifically under the 4-week flexible working hours system.
참고문헌 (16)
- 구건서, "개정노동법해설" (1997), 중앙경제사
- 김형배, "노동법", pp.378~ (2007), 박영사
- 임종률, "노동법", pp.380~ (1999), 박영사
- 강용탁, "변형근로제의 이론적 배경과 도입가능성", 경상논총, 15(1), pp.143~160 (1997), 한독경상학회
- 朴相弼, "勤勞基準法上의 變形勤勞時間制에 관한 問題點", 법학연구, 28(1) (1985), 부산대학교 법학연구소
- 위성종, "變形勤勞時間制에 관한 硏究", 노동법논총, 1, pp.131~176 (1998), 한국비교노동법학회
- 최영호, "1개월 단위 탄력적 근로시간제의 해석", 노동법연구, 15, pp.8~262 (2003), 서울대학교노동법연구회
- 丘駿彦, "工作時間, In 勞動基準法釋義-施行二十年之回顧與展望" (2009), 新學林
- 櫻井理, "新勞動時間法與勞使協定", 季刊勞動法, (152) (1989)
- 中華民國全國工業總會, "2012全國工業總會白皮書-對政府政策的建言" (2012), 中華民國全國工業總會
- 行政院勞工委員會, "工時制度參考手冊", ~ (2011)
- 行政院勞工委員會, "勞動情勢統計要覽" (2010), 行政院勞工委員會
- 呂財裕, "대만 緯創資通股份有限公司行政曁人力資源行政長인터뷰", ~ (2012)
- 王如玄, "從勞工過勞死案例檢討約定責任制之職業類別", 立法院專案報告(노공위원회 내부 파워포인트 자료), ~ (2011)
- 陳金泉, "明理法律事務所대표변호사, 인터뷰", ~ (2012)
- 陳慧敏, "대만 行政院勞工委員會(한국의 ‘고용노동부’와 같은 기관) 인터뷰", ~ (2012)
