본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

위험균등화(Risk Equalization) 도입을 위한 건강보험 위험요인 평가모형 비교 연구

An Empirical Comparison Research on Health Risk Factor for Effect of Risk Equalization Introduction

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is for analyzing utilization of each individual insurer at health care insurance market through risk adjustment for expenditure spending risk of the people. This study considered cases of netherlands about Risk Equalization to help understanding of risk equalization introduction. To know what is the closest correlation between variables for estimating expenditure spending risk and healthcare expenditure, this study analyzed data of indemnity private health care insurance. The result of this study presents that risk adjustment leads to competition by consumer's choice at the healthcare insurance market in spite of using of some variables restrictively. At the same time, this revealed that every utilization of Insurers about risk factors is different in the case of considering reality that insurers feel more delicately than government or central agency operating risk equalization fund in the whole health care insurance system. This study suggest that risk evaluation model introduction could bring every insurer utilization of incentives's deduction for selection is high and efficient incentives for expenditure saving is low on the competitive health care insurance market. Therefore, this study is valuable that risk evaluation model is analyzed in Korea before enrolling risk equalization policy, and expectable to do an important role of health care reform process.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is for analyzing utilization of each individual insurer at health care insurance market through risk adjustment for expenditure spending risk of the people. This study considered cases of netherlands about Risk Equalization to help understanding of risk equalization introduction. To know what is the closest correlation between variables for estimating expenditure spending risk and healthcare expenditure, this study analyzed data of indemnity private health care insurance. The result of this study presents that risk adjustment leads to competition by consumer's choice at the healthcare insurance market in spite of using of some variables restrictively. At the same time, this revealed that every utilization of Insurers about risk factors is different in the case of considering reality that insurers feel more delicately than government or central agency operating risk equalization fund in the whole health care insurance system. This study suggest that risk evaluation model introduction could bring every insurer utilization of incentives's deduction for selection is high and efficient incentives for expenditure saving is low on the competitive health care insurance market. Therefore, this study is valuable that risk evaluation model is analyzed in Korea before enrolling risk equalization policy, and expectable to do an important role of health care reform process.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. 공적건강보험과 민간의료보험의 역할 설정을 위한 이념적 배경, "김대호", 사회디자인연구소, ~ (2007)
  2. 김동현, "국내 민간의료보험 시장의 역선택에 관한 실증연구", 석사, 의료경영, pp.2008
  3. 국민건강보험제도 개선 및 민영건강보험 활성화 방안, "김창기", 성균관대학교 보험문화연구센터, ~ (2006)
  4. 민영건강보험의 리스크 관리방안, "보험개발원", ~ (2005)
  5. 사공진, "우리나라 건강보험료 부과체계의 문제점과 개선방안", 디지털경제연구, 9, pp.133~151 (2004)
  6. 손해보험협회, "공사의료보험의 역할 재정립", ~ (2006)
  7. 양희산, "보험가격 자유화와 공정경쟁질서에 관한 연구", 보험학회지, 57(12), pp.147~173 (2000)
  8. 국민건강보험과 민간건강보험의 보완적 발전모형, "오영수", 보험개발원 보험연구소, ~ (2005)
  9. 민간의료보험가입이 의료이용에 미치는 영향, "윤희숙", 한국개발연구원, ~ (2007)
  10. 이규식, "네덜란드의 의료개혁에 관한 연구 - 관리된 경쟁모형-", 사회보장연구, 24(4), pp.229~253 (2008), 한국사회보장학회
  11. 의료선진화를 위한 개혁방안(새로운 정책대안의 모색), "이규식", 미래의료정책연구회, ~ (2007)
  12. 이종원, "계량경제학" (2007), 박영사
  13. 장준은, "건강보험 통합전후의 관리운영비에 관한 실증연구", 석사, 의료경영, pp.2008
  14. 정기택, "민영건강보험과 도덕적 해이에 관한 실증연구", 보험학회지, (75), pp.1~26 (2006), 한국보험학회
  15. 민영건강보험 실증분석 및 공사보험 연계방안 연구, "정기택", 경희대학교 의료산업연구원, ~ (2008)
  16. 공사보험 연계를 위한 민영의료보험의 미래모형, "정기택", 국회금융정책연구회, ~ (2007)
  17. 효율적 의료보장체계 구축을 위한 민영건강보험 활성화 방안, "정기택", 경희대학교 의료산업연구원, ~ (2006)
  18. 정필선, "경제학에서의 최적화이론과 적용" (1997), 세경사
  19. OECD 국가의 의료제도(OECD HEALTH PROJECT)-성과향상을 지향하며, "정형선", 206~210 (2004)
  20. 건강보험제도의 발전과정 비교연구, "최병호", 한국보건사회연구원, ~ (2005)
  21. 한달선, "의료체계 탐색" (2005), 도서출판 한학문화
  22. 한달선, "한국 의료체계와 경쟁전략", 보건경제연구, 3, pp.164~182 (1997), 한국보건경제학회
  23. Enthoven A. C., "Theory and practice of managed competition in health care finance. Professor Dr. F. de Vries lecture in economices; volume 9" (1988), Elsevier Science Publisher
  24. Enthoven A. C., "Employment-based health insurance : past, present, and future", Health affairs, 25(6), pp.1538~1547 (2006)
  25. Enthoven A. C., "Managed Competition and California's health care economy", Health Affairs, 15, pp.39~57 (1996)
  26. Structure and experience of German opt-out system of statuory health insurance(GKV), "Markus Schneider", World Bank, ~ (2003)
  27. Miller, R. H., "Managed care plan performance since 1980, a literature analysis", Journal of the American Medical Association, 271, pp.1512~1519 (1994)
  28. Newhouse J. P., "Patient's At Risk: Health Reform and Risk Adjustment", Health Affairs, pp.133~146 (1994)
  29. Pauly, M. V., "Individual versus Job-based health insurance: weighing the Pros and Cons", Health affairs, 18(6), pp.28~44 (1999)
  30. Robinson J. C., "A method for risk-adjusting employer contributions to competiting health insurance plans", Inquiry, 28, pp.107~116 (1991)
  31. Rothschild M., "Equilibrium in competitive insurance markets : an essay on the economics of imperfect information", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, pp.629~649 (1976)
  32. Schwartz K., "Reducing Risk Selection Requires more than Risk Adjustments", Inquiry, 32, pp.6~10 (1995)
  33. Van Barneveld E. M., "Risk sharing as a supplement to imperfect capitation : a tradeoff between selection and efficiency", Journal of Health Economics, 20(2), pp.147~168 (2001)
  34. Van de Ven W. P., "Risk Adjusted Capitation; Recent Experience in the Netherlands", Health Affairs, pp.120~136 (1994)
  35. Van de Ven W. P., "Risk adjustment and risk selection on the sickness fund insurance market in five European countries", Health Policy, 65(1), pp.75~98 (2003)
  36. Van de ven, W. P., "Risk adjustment in competitive health insurance markets, In Handbook of Health Economics", pp.755~845 (2000), Elsevier
  37. Van de ven, W. P., "Access to coverage for high-risk consumers in a competitive individual health insurance market : via premium rate restrictions or risk-adjusted premium subsidies?", Journal of Health Economics, 19, pp.311~339 (2000)
  38. Van de Ven, W. P., "Risk adjustment and risk selection on the health insurer market in five European countries", Health Policy, 65(1), pp.75~98 (2003)
  39. Van de Ven, W. P., "Health-adjusted premium subsidies in the Netherlands", Health Affairs, 23(3), pp.45~55 (2004)
  40. Van de Ven, W. P., "Risk adjustment and risk selection in Europe: six years later", Health Policy, 83, pp.162~179 (2007)
  41. Van de Ven, W. P., "Risk equalization in an individual health insurance market: the only escape from the tradeoff between affordability, efficiency and selection" (2007)
  42. Van Kleef, R. C., "Does risk equalization reduce the viability of voluntary deductibles?", International Journal of Helalth Care Finance and Economics (2007)
  43. Van Vliet R. C. J. A., "Towards a Capitation Formula for Competing Health Insurers, An Empirical Analysis", Soc Sci Med, 34(9), pp.1035~1048 (1992)
  44. Van Vliet R. C. J. A., "Predictability of Individual Health Care Expenditure", Journal of Risk and Insurance, 59(3), pp.443~460 (1992)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)