유기농경지 농업생산경관 구성요소에 대한 전문가 인식 조사
Survey of Expert’s Perceptions about Landscape Elements in Organic Farmland
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With increasing public concern for environmentally friendly agriculture, ecological aspect of landscape management is of growing importance. AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) analysis were conducted based on the delphi survey of 31 experts to evaluate the relative importance and the preference of landscape elements. Landscape components of organic farmland were classified into 2 landscape fields, 5 landscape types, 14 landscape units, and 37 landscape elements. Overall relevance score for the proposed landscape components were about 5.5 on the seven point scale. While the relative importance weight of cropland landscape field was 0.71, the weight of intra-structure landscape field was 0.29. Among the cropland landscape, relatively higher weight was assigned to farming system (0.47) and margins (0.31), as compared with hydrological system (0.22). In the farming system, crop (0.40) and farm land (0.39) were the most important landscape units. In the margins, higher weight was given to Buffer zone (0.44) and Trees (0.42). Biological habitat (0.43) ranked the highest score in the hydrological system. Preferable landscape elements were glass house, companion plants, rice paddy field, diverse crop species, small pond, and small river, which are representing ecological advantage of organic farming systems. This result indicated that the landscape elements identified in the study would be suitable to evaluate ecological aspect of rural landscape in organic farmland.
Abstract
With increasing public concern for environmentally friendly agriculture, ecological aspect of landscape management is of growing importance. AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) analysis were conducted based on the delphi survey of 31 experts to evaluate the relative importance and the preference of landscape elements. Landscape components of organic farmland were classified into 2 landscape fields, 5 landscape types, 14 landscape units, and 37 landscape elements. Overall relevance score for the proposed landscape components were about 5.5 on the seven point scale. While the relative importance weight of cropland landscape field was 0.71, the weight of intra-structure landscape field was 0.29. Among the cropland landscape, relatively higher weight was assigned to farming system (0.47) and margins (0.31), as compared with hydrological system (0.22). In the farming system, crop (0.40) and farm land (0.39) were the most important landscape units. In the margins, higher weight was given to Buffer zone (0.44) and Trees (0.42). Biological habitat (0.43) ranked the highest score in the hydrological system. Preferable landscape elements were glass house, companion plants, rice paddy field, diverse crop species, small pond, and small river, which are representing ecological advantage of organic farming systems. This result indicated that the landscape elements identified in the study would be suitable to evaluate ecological aspect of rural landscape in organic farmland.
참고문헌 (23)
- 채혜성, "농업생산공간 경관의 효율적 관리를 위한 경관구성요소 분류에 관한 기초 연구", 농촌계획, 11(3) (2005), 한국농촌계획학회
- Hendriks, K., "The appearance of agriculture An assessment of the quality of landscape of both organic and conventional horticultural farms in West Friesland", Agric Ecosyst Environ, 77, pp.157~175 (2000)
- 홍정만, "AHP 기법을 적용한 민간 기업의 신재생에너지 평가항목에 대한 연구", 에너지경제연구, 10(1), pp.115~142 (2011), 에너지경제연구원
- Kang, H. J., "A Study on the Rural Landscape Evaluation Indicators Using Delphi Method", pp.2012
- Kim, E. J., "A Study on the Development of Evaluation Criteria for Rural Amenity", pp.2007
- 김혜민, "어메니티에 기초한 친환경농업 경작지의 경관특성요소 분석", 한국지역사회생활과학회지, 17(1), pp.11~21 (2006), 한국지역사회생활과학회
- Kim, J. O., "A Study on Ecological Characteristics of Small Irrigation Pond (Dum- bung) in Paddy Field", pp.2012
- 김상범, "농촌경관계획을 위한 공간별 주요경관요소에 관한 연구 -농촌전통테마마을을 중심으로-", 농촌계획, 12(3), pp.13~18 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
- Kim, S. B., "A Study on Preference and Importance of Rural Landscape Elements", Korean J. Soc Community Living Sci, 5, pp.136~136 (2006)
- Kuiper, Juliteet, "A Checklist approach to evaluate the contribution of organic farms to landscape quality", Agric Ecosyst Environ, 77, pp.143~156 (2000)
- Kwon, O. S., "Aesthetic Quality Analysis and Landscape Planning based on Landscapetope Classification", pp.2013
- Lampkin, N., "An International Perspective" (1994), CAB International
- 이경진, "농산어촌지역 대표경관 선정에 관한 연구 - 충남지역을 사례로-", 농촌관광연구, 16(4), pp.45~61 (2009), 한국농촌관광학회
- 나정화, "경관 생태 연구의 새로운 방법론 모색을 통한 도입 가능성과 한계성", 한국조경학회지, 33(4), pp.45~70 (2005), 한국조경학회
- Saaty, R. W., "The Analytic Hierarchy Process", Math Model, 9, pp.161~176 (1987)
- Song, G. W., "Reconstruct the Scale research to Improve Consistency of the AHP", Korean J. Assoc Local Gov, 2, pp.185~195 (2012)
- 송근원, "AHP의 일관성 향상을 위한 척도 재구성", 사회과학연구, 29(2), pp.271~288 (2013), 사회과학연구소
- 송미령, "농촌경관 보전을 위한 정책 동향과 시사점", 농촌경제, 28(3), pp.121~137 (2005), 한국농촌경제연구원
- 송미령, "마을개발사업의 성과와 주민참여의 관계 분석", 한국지역개발학회지, 17(4), pp.293~320 (2005), 한국지역개발학회
- Stobbelaar, D. J., "Landscape quality on organic farms in the Messara valley, Crete Organic farms as components in the landscape", Agric Ecosyst Environ, 77, pp.79~93 (2000)
- 여화선, "경관정보에 기반한 농어촌 환경색채 연구 - 경기도 이천시를 중심으로 -", 디지털디자인학연구, 13(3), pp.393~402 (2013), 한국디지털디자인학회
- 김혜민, "친환경 경작지의 경관특성요소 도출 및 평가에 관한 연구", 국토계획, 41(2), pp.167~178 (2006), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- 윤희정, "CRM을 이용한 친환경농업의 경관가치 평가", 한국조경학회지, 34(1), pp.37~47 (2006), 한국조경학회