본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Trusts and Choice of Law in South Korea: The Case for Adopting the Hague Trusts Convention

3

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Despite having recognised the trust for 60 years now, South Korean law does not contain specific choice of law rules applicable to trusts. This is a regrettable state of affairs in our increasingly globalised world, where incidences of cross-border trust disputes will only be on the rise. This paper argues that the lack of a dedicated set of choice of law rules relating to trusts causes much confusion and uncertainty, not only as to how South Korean courts would characterise a trust dispute and the inconsistent connecting factors which would apply, but also in relation to the scope of the applicable choice of law rules (whichever they may be) and the special difficulties raised by a breach of trust claim. All these difficulties derogate from a proper recognition of the trust as a distinctive legal device, and fail properly to protect the autonomy and legitimate expectations of the parties. The paper suggests that these problems would easily fall away if the South Korean legislature adopts the Hague Trusts Convention.

Abstract

Despite having recognised the trust for 60 years now, South Korean law does not contain specific choice of law rules applicable to trusts. This is a regrettable state of affairs in our increasingly globalised world, where incidences of cross-border trust disputes will only be on the rise. This paper argues that the lack of a dedicated set of choice of law rules relating to trusts causes much confusion and uncertainty, not only as to how South Korean courts would characterise a trust dispute and the inconsistent connecting factors which would apply, but also in relation to the scope of the applicable choice of law rules (whichever they may be) and the special difficulties raised by a breach of trust claim. All these difficulties derogate from a proper recognition of the trust as a distinctive legal device, and fail properly to protect the autonomy and legitimate expectations of the parties. The paper suggests that these problems would easily fall away if the South Korean legislature adopts the Hague Trusts Convention.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. David Hayton, "“Trusts” in Private International Law", COLLECTED COURSES OF THE HAGUE ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 366, pp.9~ (2013)
  2. Richard Garnett, "Asia-Pacific Trusts Law: Theory and Practice in Context" (2021)
  3. David Hayton, "Reflections on The Hague Trusts Convention After 30 Years", J. OF PRIV INT’L L, 12, pp.1~ (2016)
  4. Christopher Forsyth, "Characterisation Revisited: An Essay in the Theory of the English Conflict of Laws", L. Q. Rev, 114, pp.141~ (1998)
  5. Ying-Chieh Wu, "Trust Law in Asian Civil Law Jurisdictions: A Compa rat ive Anal ysis", pp.46~ (2013)
  6. Peter Jaffey, "Explaining the Trust", L. Q. Rev, 131, pp.377~ (2015)
  7. William Maitland, "The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland" (1911)
  8. Ying-Chieh Wu, "East Asian Trusts at the Crossroads", Nat ’l Taiwan Univ. L. Rev, 10, pp.79~ (2015)
  9. , wholly amended by Act No. 6465, Apr. 7, 2001, amended by Act No. 10629, May 19, 2011, Art. 49,
  10. T. M. Yeo, "Choice of Law for Equita ble Doctrines", pp.71~ (2004)
  11. Weizuo Chen, "The Asian Principles of Private International Law: Objectives, Contents, Structure and Selected Topics on Choice of Law", J. of Priv. Int’l L, 13, pp.411~ (2017)
  12. Walter Wheeler Cook, "Logical and Legal Bases of Conflict of Laws", Yale L. J, 33, pp.457~ (1923)
  13. Adeline Chong, "The Common Law Choice of law Rules for Resulting and Constructive Trusts", Int’l & Compa r. L. Q, 54, pp.855~ (2005)
  14. HLA Hart, "The Concept of Law", pp.27~28 (2006)
  15. Kwang-Hyun Suk, "New Conflict of Laws Act of the Republic of Korea", J. Korean L, 1, pp.197~ (2001)
  16. Max Rheinstein, "The Place of Wrong: A Study in the Method of Case Law", Tula ne Law Review, 4, pp.19~ (1945)
  17. Hong-Sik Chung, "Introduction to Korean Law", pp.283~ (2013)
  18. David Hayton, "Underhill and Hayton: Law Relat ing to Trusts and Trustees" (2016)
  19. Dong-Sik Choi, , pp.328~329 (2006)
  20. QSC 332, , 2012
  21. Lord Collins of Map esbury, "Dicey, Morris & Coll ins on the Conflict of Laws" (2018)
  22. Jonat han Harris, "The Hag ue Trusts Convention", pp.166~169 (2002)
  23. Young-Seok Lee, "Asian Conflict of Laws: East and South East Asia", pp.93~ (2015)
  24. Moon-Sook Kim, "On the Korean Private International Law", Jap . Y.B. Int’L. L, 51, pp.327~ (2008)
  25. MAlfred Evon Overbeck, "Book II —Trusts—Applicable law and Recognition", pp.370~ (1984)
  26. David McClean, "E Pluribus Unum, Liber Amicorum Georges A L Droz, On The Progress", pp.217~ (1996)
  27. 이계정, "부당이득에 있어서 이득토출책임의 법리와 그 시사점 -반환범위에 있어 손해중심에서 이득중심으로의 전환-", 저스티스, 169, pp.37~87 (2018), 한국법학원[DOI]
  28. , 2009
  29. Kwang Hyun Suk, "Encyclopedia of Private Internat ional Law", pp.2279~ (2017)
  30. Youngjoon Kwon, "Civil Law and Civil Procedural Law in Introduction to Korean Law", pp.125~ (2013), Korea Legislation Research Institute

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)