“潛氣內轉”辨
A Discussion on “Qianqineizhuan”(潛氣內轉)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The character of Qianqineizhuan(潛氣內轉) originates from some vocalization that people sing by imitating musical instruments, which is different from Zhuanhou(轉喉), a technique of uttering words as the same tune as changing sound through throat. Qianqineizhuan(潛氣內轉) was becoming to be a structure method in the work of literature and art, especially till Qing Dynasty, such as the structure of characters and the layout in handwriting and the intermittent flow in literature. First, how to structure the shape and make the layout is the most important point for handwriting. The brushwork is neither no change nor loose. Something we cannot figure out exist there, as it’s be called Qi(氣). Whether or not there is Qi(氣), it determines the level of work. For the parallel prose, sentence meaning switching doesn't depend on the function word, but the content word. For that, the normal meaning of sentence is to be interrupted and it seems incoherent and indistinct. In fact, the purpose pulse doesn't lose all along. The way to link different parts together is not very obvious so that people remained for thousands years unconscious of it. Qianqineizhuan(潛氣內轉) came to light, then brought the parallel prose and classic prose into the new world because it showed clearly direction for writing. At the same time, we can also find the same things in Ci-ology field. Jiang Kui(姜夔) and Wu Wenying(吳文英), the famous writer of Ci(詞), their writing ways couldn't get their meaning across for extraordinary arrangement of characters. Since content word replaced function word, the sentences couldn't provide us distinct and well-defined meanings. It’s be called Anzhuan(暗轉) or Neizhuan(內轉), similar to Qianqineizhuan(潛氣內轉). Qianqineizhuan(潛氣內轉), regarded as the most important skill of two, has developed into a new Qi(氣) theory by modern researcher's language misunderstanding and borrowing, differentiated from the ancient prose, and enriched the connotation of traditional Qi(氣) theory.
Abstract
The character of Qianqineizhuan(潛氣內轉) originates from some vocalization that people sing by imitating musical instruments, which is different from Zhuanhou(轉喉), a technique of uttering words as the same tune as changing sound through throat. Qianqineizhuan(潛氣內轉) was becoming to be a structure method in the work of literature and art, especially till Qing Dynasty, such as the structure of characters and the layout in handwriting and the intermittent flow in literature. First, how to structure the shape and make the layout is the most important point for handwriting. The brushwork is neither no change nor loose. Something we cannot figure out exist there, as it’s be called Qi(氣). Whether or not there is Qi(氣), it determines the level of work. For the parallel prose, sentence meaning switching doesn't depend on the function word, but the content word. For that, the normal meaning of sentence is to be interrupted and it seems incoherent and indistinct. In fact, the purpose pulse doesn't lose all along. The way to link different parts together is not very obvious so that people remained for thousands years unconscious of it. Qianqineizhuan(潛氣內轉) came to light, then brought the parallel prose and classic prose into the new world because it showed clearly direction for writing. At the same time, we can also find the same things in Ci-ology field. Jiang Kui(姜夔) and Wu Wenying(吳文英), the famous writer of Ci(詞), their writing ways couldn't get their meaning across for extraordinary arrangement of characters. Since content word replaced function word, the sentences couldn't provide us distinct and well-defined meanings. It’s be called Anzhuan(暗轉) or Neizhuan(內轉), similar to Qianqineizhuan(潛氣內轉). Qianqineizhuan(潛氣內轉), regarded as the most important skill of two, has developed into a new Qi(氣) theory by modern researcher's language misunderstanding and borrowing, differentiated from the ancient prose, and enriched the connotation of traditional Qi(氣) theory.
참고문헌 (23)
- 卜永堅, "廖恩燾詞集箋注" (2016), 廣東人民出版社
- 曹虹, "清代常州駢文研究" (2010), 鳳凰出版社
- 陳匪石, "宋詞舉" (2002), 江蘇古籍出版社
- 陳匪石, "詞話叢編 第五冊" (2005), 中華書局
- 陳洵, "詞話叢編 第五冊" (2005), 中華書局
- 譚獻, "詞話叢編 第四冊" (2005), 中華書局
- 夏敬觀, "詞話叢編 第五冊" (2005), 中華書局
- 夏敬觀, "詞話叢編 第五冊" (2005), 中華書局
- 呂雙偉, "清代駢文理論研究" (2011), 人民出版社
- 敏澤, "中國美學思想史" (1987), 齊魯書社
- 孫德謙, "歷代文話" (2007), 復旦大學出版社
- 顔建華, "清代乾嘉駢文研究" (2011), 光明日報出版社
- 楊旭輝, "清代駢文史" (2013), 人民出版社
- 葉長海, "曲學與戲劇學" (1999), 學林出版社
- 葉農, "中國駢文發展史論" (2010), 澳門文化藝術學會
- 袁津琥, "藝概注稿" (2009), 中華書局
- 張仁青, "中國駢文發展史" (2010), 浙江大學出版社
- 朱一新, "無邪堂答問" (2000), 上海古籍出版社
- 西北師範大學文學院, "中國古代散文論叢2013年第三屆駢文國際學術研討會論文專輯" (2014), 世界圖書出版公司
- 莫道才, "駢文文論:從辭章之論到氣韵之說——論朱一新“潜氣內轉”說的內涵, 來源與價值", 文學評論, (4) (2013)
- 彭玉平, "詞學史上的“潛氣內轉”說", 文學評論, (2) (2012)
- 余祖坤, "論古典文章學中的“潛氣內轉”", 中南民族大學學報, (1) (2012)
- 夏敬觀, "夏敬觀跋宋人詞集", 詞學, 31 (2014), 華東師範大學出版社
