본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Mid-term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Cementless Femoral Stems

이경재|임경환|민병우|장형규|예희욱
대한고관절학회 (The Korean Hip Society)|2015.09|Hip and Pelvis|제27권 제3호|pp. 135-140|DOI 10.5371/hp.2015.27.3.135

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

HipBone defectRevision arthroplastyModular femoral stem

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of revision total hip arthroplasty using modular distal fixation stems for proximal femoral deficiency. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients (47 hips) were analyzed more than 24 months after revision total hip arthroplasty that used modular distal fixation stems and was performed between 2006 and 2012. There were proximal femoral defects in all cases. Preoperative femoral defect classification revealed Paprosky type II in 31 cases, type IIIA in 7, and type IIIB in 9. The mean duration of follow-up was 53.4 (25-100) months. We evaluated the Harris hip score (HHS), walking ability according to Koval as clinical parameters, stem stability, and stem position change as radiographic parameters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Results: The average HHS improved form 39.5 points to 91.3 points and walking ability also improved in most cases; all patients had stable fixation of the femoral stem. Postoperative complications included 5 cases of infection and 2 cases of dislocation. The survival rate with the end point of re-revision surgery due to infection or dislocation was 86% after 8-year follow-up. Conclusion: Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty using modular femoral stems is useful because the stems can be stably fixed on the diaphyseal portion of the femur, which has relatively good bone quality at mid-term follow-up.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of revision total hip arthroplasty using modular distal fixation stems for proximal femoral deficiency. Materials and Methods: Forty-five patients (47 hips) were analyzed more than 24 months after revision total hip arthroplasty that used modular distal fixation stems and was performed between 2006 and 2012. There were proximal femoral defects in all cases. Preoperative femoral defect classification revealed Paprosky type II in 31 cases, type IIIA in 7, and type IIIB in 9. The mean duration of follow-up was 53.4 (25-100) months. We evaluated the Harris hip score (HHS), walking ability according to Koval as clinical parameters, stem stability, and stem position change as radiographic parameters. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. Results: The average HHS improved form 39.5 points to 91.3 points and walking ability also improved in most cases; all patients had stable fixation of the femoral stem. Postoperative complications included 5 cases of infection and 2 cases of dislocation. The survival rate with the end point of re-revision surgery due to infection or dislocation was 86% after 8-year follow-up. Conclusion: Cementless revision total hip arthroplasty using modular femoral stems is useful because the stems can be stably fixed on the diaphyseal portion of the femur, which has relatively good bone quality at mid-term follow-up.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. Sporer SM, "Revision total hip arthroplasty:the limits of fully coated stems", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (417), pp.203~209 (2003)
  2. Spitzer AI, "The S-ROM cementless femoral stem: history and literature review", Orthopedics, 28(9 Suppl), pp.s1117~s1124 (2005)
  3. Buly R, "The S-ROM stem: versatility of stem", sleeve combinations and head options, 2005, pp.28(9Suppl), s1025~s1032
  4. Cameron HU, "The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (298), pp.47~53 (1994)
  5. Weeden SH, "Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 17(4 Suppl 1), pp.134~137 (2002)
  6. Harris WH, "Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 51, pp.737~755 (1969)
  7. Koval KJ, "Ambulatory ability after hip fracture. A prospective study in geriatric patients", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (310), pp.150~159 (1995)
  8. Engh CA, "Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (257), pp.107~128 (1990)
  9. Kaplan EL, "Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations", J Am Stat Assoc, 53, pp.457~481 (1958)
  10. Amenabar T, "Promising mid-term results with a cup-cage construct for large acetabular defects and pelvic discontinuity", Clin Orthop Relat Res (2015)
  11. Mulroy WF, "Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteenyear-average follow-up study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78, pp.325~330 (1996)
  12. Pellicci PM, "Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 67, pp.513~516 (1985)
  13. Elting JJ, "Preliminary report of impaction grafting for exchange femoral arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (319), pp.159~167 (1995)
  14. Fowler JL, "Experience with the Exeter total hip replacement since 1970", Orthop Clin North Am, 19, pp.477~489 (1988)
  15. Gie GA, "Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 75, pp.14~21 (1993)
  16. Krishnamurthy AB, "5-to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery", J Arthroplasty, 12, pp.839~847 (1997)
  17. Moreland JR, "Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (393), pp.194~201 (2001)
  18. Cameron HU, "The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty", J Arthroplasty, 17(4 Suppl 1), pp.138~141 (2002)
  19. Chandler HP, "Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (319), pp.130~140 (1995)
  20. Jones RE, "Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (420), pp.142~147 (2004)
  21. Kwong LM, "A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study", J Arthroplasty, 18(3 Suppl 1), pp.94~97 (2003)
  22. Wirtz DC, "A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR", Int Orthop, 24, pp.134~138 (2000)
  23. Hunter GA, "The results of revision of total hip arthroplasty", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 61(B), pp.419~421 (1979)
  24. Gustilo RB, "Revision total hip arthroplasty with titanium ingrowth prosthesis and bone grafting for failed cemented femoral component loosening", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (235), pp.111~119 (1988)
  25. Kershaw CJ, "Revision total hip arthroplasty for aseptic failure. A review of 276 cases", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 73, pp.564~568 (1991)
  26. Berry DJ, "Femoral revision: distal fixation with fluted, tapered grit-blasted stems", J Arthroplasty, 17(4Suppl 1), pp.142~146 (2002)
  27. Chandler H, "Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (298), pp.67~74 (1994)
  28. Amanatullah DF, "Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component", Bone Joint J, 97(B), pp.312~317 (2015)
  29. Schuh A, "Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem : outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4years’ follow-up", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 124, pp.306~309 (2004)
  30. Hoberg M, "Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty", Int Orthop, 39, pp.1709~1713 (2015)
  31. Wirtz DC, "Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem : 5-to 16-year results of 163 cases", Acta Orthop, 85, pp.562~569 (2014)
  32. Brown NM, "Modular tapered implants for severe femoral bone loss in THA : reliable osseointegration but frequent complications", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 473, pp.555~560 (2015)
  33. Barrack RL, "Orthopaedic crossfire--Stem modularity is unnecessary in revision total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative", J Arthroplasty, 18(3 Suppl 1), pp.98~100 (2003)
  34. Bobyn JD, "Concerns with modularity in total hip arthroplasty", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (298), pp.27~36 (1994)

관련 논문AI추천

Management of Severe Bone Defects in Femoral Revision following Total Hip ArthroplastyLi Cao, Yicheng Li대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2024 · 제36권 제2호조립형 revision 대퇴 삽입물을 이용한 고관절 치환술의 단기 추시안재훈, 이항호, 최원식대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2005 · 제17권 제1호The Short-term Clinical Outcome of Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Short Metaphyseal Loading Femoral Stem김성국, 최유왕대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2016 · 제28권 제2호인공 고관절 재치환술에서 조립형 무시멘트 대퇴스템 사용 후 실패요인 분석김도연, 박명식, 박종혁대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2012 · 제24권 제2호Modular Stems: Advantages and Current Role in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty박윤수, 박찬우, 임승재대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2018 · 제30권 제3호Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Rectangular Tapered Cementless Stem According to Proximal Femoral Geometry in Elderly Asian Patients강준순, Sang Hyun Ko, Yeop Na, Yung-Hun Youn대한고관절학회 · Hip and Pelvis2019 · 제31권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

Plain Radiography of the Hip: A Review of Radiographic Techniques and Image Features박윤수, 임승재pp. 125-134Comparison of Perioperative Blood Loss in Primary Non-cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty for Rapidly Destructive Coxarthrosis and Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head송주현, 한석구, 이재민, 이경훈, 이기행pp. 141-145Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty정영율, 박지훈, 이정호, 김민욱pp. 146-151A Comparison of Internal Fixation and Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Reverse Oblique Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures in Elderly Patients박봉주, 조홍만, 민웅배pp. 152-163Surgical Treatment of Undisplaced Femur Neck Fractures in Dementia Patients Using Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation민웅배, 조홍만, 박봉주pp. 164-172
원문 보기