전자상거래에 있어서 착오에 관한 연구
A Study on a mistake in the Electronic Commerce
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Electronic Commerce(EC) contracted by means of electronic methods has more possibility to cause a mistake than common transactions. A mistake in EC has already happened and been a major cause of disputes. But it is not easy to present a legal settlement about a mistake in Cyber-mall, and is very difficult to say uniformly that a party can cancel a contract on account of a mistake. Therefore, I suggested concrete cases to settle this problem and these cases consisted of buyer's and seller's mistake. Firstly, a buyer is not entitled to cancel an offer where a mistake as to quantity of goods is not a fundamental matter of contract. Where a mistake about quantity of goods was a fundamental matter of contract and seller provided a buyer with webpage to correct an offer, buyer cann't cancel an offer because of a serious negligence. Secondly, if seller advertised goods without a distinction from other goods in a cyber-mall and there was a huge difference between a original price and a price marked, seller can cancel a consent. But if seller discriminated a goods from others in advertisement and buyer could select this goods easily, seller cann't cancel a consent because of a serious negligence. However, consumer who cann't cancel an offer by reason of a mistake can exercise the right of withdrawal according to "the Act on the consumer protection in the electronic commerce transaction, etc".
Abstract
The Electronic Commerce(EC) contracted by means of electronic methods has more possibility to cause a mistake than common transactions. A mistake in EC has already happened and been a major cause of disputes. But it is not easy to present a legal settlement about a mistake in Cyber-mall, and is very difficult to say uniformly that a party can cancel a contract on account of a mistake. Therefore, I suggested concrete cases to settle this problem and these cases consisted of buyer's and seller's mistake. Firstly, a buyer is not entitled to cancel an offer where a mistake as to quantity of goods is not a fundamental matter of contract. Where a mistake about quantity of goods was a fundamental matter of contract and seller provided a buyer with webpage to correct an offer, buyer cann't cancel an offer because of a serious negligence. Secondly, if seller advertised goods without a distinction from other goods in a cyber-mall and there was a huge difference between a original price and a price marked, seller can cancel a consent. But if seller discriminated a goods from others in advertisement and buyer could select this goods easily, seller cann't cancel a consent because of a serious negligence. However, consumer who cann't cancel an offer by reason of a mistake can exercise the right of withdrawal according to "the Act on the consumer protection in the electronic commerce transaction, etc".
참고문헌 (60)
- "전자상거래와 소비자보호법" (2003), 다솜출판사
- "전자상거래 시대의 법" (2002), 미래와경영
- "민법강의(상)" (2004), 박영사
- "전자상거래법" (2002), 삼영사
- "전자거래의 적정화에 관한 법제연구" (2001), 한국법제연구원
- "민법사례연습" (2004), 세창출판사
- "전자상거래법" (2001), 다산출판사
- "전자거래입법의 문제점과 개선방안" (2002), 한국법제연구원
- "2002 전자상거래 소비자피해 백서" (2003), 한국소비자보호원
- 고형석, "통신판매중개에 관한 연구", (20) (2003), 법무부
- 고형석, "전자상거래와 해제", 정보화정책, 11(1), pp.74~93 (2004), 한국정보화진흥원
- 구재군, "인터넷 사이버몰 이용계약에 관한 소고", 10(1) (2003), 한국전산원.
- 구재군, "전자거래에 있어서 계약의 성립에 관한 법적 검토", 25 (2001), 단국대학교.
- 김은기, "전자상거래에서의 소비자보호의 문제점 및 개선방안", (146) (2003), 국회사무처 법제실.
- 김민중, "제조물책임법의 입법화와 그 내용", 1 (2000), 전북대학교.
- 김성준, "인터넷법률의 형성과 전망", (창간) (2000), 법무부.
- 노태악, "전자거래와 계약", 100 (2003), 법원도서관.
- 류창호, "전자상거래소비자법에 관한 연구", 12 (2002), 한국외국어대학교.
- 박희주, "전자상거래의 법적 문제", (22) (1999), 한국소비자보호원.
- 송덕수, "착오론의 체계와 법류효과의 착오", (9) (1993), 한국민사법학회
- 신종철, "할부거래의 법적 구성 및 할부매매의 특성", 7(1) (1995), 한국해사법학회.
- 안법영, "민법총칙 개정안에 관한 토론의견" (2001), 법무부
- 안현상, "제42차 유엔국제거래법위원회(UNCITRAL) 전자상거래 실무작업반 회의-국제무역에 있어서 데이터 메시지 사용에 관한 협약초안 성안회의-", 3(1) (2004), 외교통상부
- 오병철, "시스템계약의 성립에 관한 법적 고찰", 2(1) (1995), 정보통신정책학회.
- 오병철, "전자적 의사표시에 관한 연구" (1996), 연세대학교
- 이성구, "전자상거래에서의 소비자보호 법제 정비", 4(2) (2000), 한국 정보법학회
- "인터넷 통신판매업자의 민사법적 책임" (2001), 한국법제연구원
- "인터넷상에서의 계약체결", 23 (1998), 중앙대학교 법학연구소.
- "소비자보호법상의 철회권", 14 (1996), 숭실대학교.
- "전자상거래에서의 계약의 체결과 소비자보호", 6 (2003), 인하대학교 법학연구소.
- "자동화된 의사표시", 31(3) (1998), 한국법학원
- "물건요건론 고소", 11(2) (2004), 한국비교사법학회.
- "제조물책임의 법제 및 보험에 대한 고찰", (315) (2002), 대한변호사협회.
- "전자거래와 계약법", 5(2) (1998), 한국비교사법학회.
- "전자상거래에 있어서 소비자보호에 관한 법제도의 연구" (2001), 경성대학교
- "消費者私法の原理" (1992), 有斐閣
- "消費者私法論" (1998), 信山社
- "民法 II(債權各論)" (1998), 東京大學出版會
- "民法講義 I" (2001), 有斐閣
- "韓國民法の現代化(一)", 126(2) (2002), 有斐閣
- "錯誤者の過失-サヴィニー, イエリング, ベール-現代私法學の形成と現代法理論" (1996), 九州大學出版會
- "不當表示と情報提供者の責任, 消費者保護の法律問題-森泉 章ㆍ池田眞朗 編" (1994), 勁草書房
- "電子商取引の法律問題, ネットと法-高橋和之ㆍ松井茂記 編" (2001), 有斐閣
- "高度情報通信社會の契約法, 新版註釋民法(13)-谷口知平ㆍ五十嵐淸 編" (1996), 有斐閣
- "電子契約の法的諸問題", (215) (2002), 有斐閣
- "電子消費者契約及び電子承諾通知に關する民法の特例に關する法律の槪要", 718 (2001), 商事法務硏究會
- "Contract Law, third edt" (2001), Longman
- "Cyberlaw and E-Commerce" (2002), McGraw-Hill
- "CyberLaw" (2001), South-Western College Publishing
- "The Law of Contract" (1995), Sweet&Maxwell
- "Internet Law & Policy" (2002), Prentice Hall
- "The law of Contracts, fourth edt" (1998), WEST Group
- "Practical Business Law, third edt" (1995), Prentice Hall
- "Contract Law and Practice" (1996), Kluwer Law International
- "Business Law" (1993), Butterworths
- "The Law of Contracts and the Uniform Commercial Code" (1995), Delmar Publishers
- "Law for E-Commerce" (2002), West legal Studies in Business
- "Business Law & the Legal Environment, seventeenth edt" (1999), WEST
- "Cyberlaw" (2002), Prentice Hall
- "E-Commerce Law" (2001), Palladian Law Publishing