본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Financial Market Reactions to Patent Litigation: An Event Study of Litigation in Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

This paper investigates patent litigation in Korea to examine how the stock market responds to a patent litigation announcement and determine whether the response is consistent with the final litigation outcome. Employing an event study methodology, we investigate cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) based on various litigant characteristics and find a strong and negative stock market response to a litigation announcement, especially towards patent owners and small firms. The final outcome of litigation for a small innovator is negatively correlated with a stock market response, even when the patent is found valid and the owner wins the case. This implies that small innovators are more likely to experience a negative response from the stock market, and they are much more vulnerable to patent litigation, paying additional fringe costs to protect their intellectual properties. The study suggests a policy implication in which the litigation process needs to consider such disadvantages to small innovators as a means of improving procedural fairness in patent litigation.

Abstract

This paper investigates patent litigation in Korea to examine how the stock market responds to a patent litigation announcement and determine whether the response is consistent with the final litigation outcome. Employing an event study methodology, we investigate cumulative abnormal returns (CARs) based on various litigant characteristics and find a strong and negative stock market response to a litigation announcement, especially towards patent owners and small firms. The final outcome of litigation for a small innovator is negatively correlated with a stock market response, even when the patent is found valid and the owner wins the case. This implies that small innovators are more likely to experience a negative response from the stock market, and they are much more vulnerable to patent litigation, paying additional fringe costs to protect their intellectual properties. The study suggests a policy implication in which the litigation process needs to consider such disadvantages to small innovators as a means of improving procedural fairness in patent litigation.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Amin, K. I., "Option Trading, Price Discovery, and Earnings News Dissemination", Contemporary Accounting Research, 14, pp.153~192 (1997)
  2. Andersen, T. G., "Micro Effects of Macro Announcements : Real-time Price Discovery in Foreign Exchange", American Economic Review, 93(1), pp.38~62 (2003)
  3. Andersen, T. G., "Real-time Price Discovery in Global Stock, Bond and Foreign Exchange Markets", Journal of International Economics, 73(2), pp.251~277 (2007)
  4. Barro, R. J., "Unanticipated Money Growth and Unemployment in the United States", American Economic Review, 67(2), pp.101~115 (1977)
  5. Bernard, V. L., "Evidence that Stock Prices do not Fully Reflect the Implications of Current Earnings for Future Earnings", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 13(4), pp.305~340 (1990)
  6. The Patent Litigation Explosion, "Bessen, J.", Boston Univ, ~ (2005)
  7. Bessen, J., "The Private Costs of Patent Litigation", 2nd Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper (2007)
  8. Bessen, J., "Patent Failure: How Judges, Bureaucrats, and Lawyers Put Innovators at Risk" (2008), Princeton University Press
  9. Bhagat, S., "The Costs of Inefficient Bargaining and Financial Distress : Evidence from Corporate Lawsuits", Journal of Financial Economics, 35(2), pp.221~247 (1994)
  10. Bizjak, J., "The Effect of Private Antitrust Litigation on the Stock Market Valuation of the Firm", American Economic Review, 85(3), pp.436~461 (1995)
  11. Blose, L., "Catastrophic Events, Contagion, and Stock Market Efficiency : The Case of the Space Shuttle Challenger", Review of Financial Economics, 5(2), pp.117~129 (1996)
  12. Brown, S. J., "Using Daily Stock Returns : The Case of Event Studies", Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), pp.3~31 (1985)
  13. Griffin, D., "The Weighing of Evidence and the Determinants of Confidence", Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), pp.411~435 (1992)
  14. Hur, W., "A Man is Known by the Company he Keeps? : A Streuctural Relationship between Backward Citation and Forward Citation of Patents", Research Policy, 50(1), pp.104~117 (2021)
  15. Ikenberry, D., "Market Under-reaction to Open Market Share Repurchases", Journal of Financial Economics, 39(2-3), pp.181~208 (1995)
  16. Kim, Y. K., "Examination Workloads, Grant Decision Bias and Examination Quality of Patent Office", Research Policy, 46(5), pp.1005~1019 (2017)
  17. Koku, P., "The Effects of News on Initial Corporate Lawsuits", Journal of Business Research, 53(1), pp.49~55 (2001)
  18. Lanjouw, J. O., "Tilting the Table? The Use of Preliminary Injunctions", Journal of Law and Economics, 44(2), pp.573~603 (2001)
  19. Lanjouw, J. O., "Protecting Intellectual Property Rights : Are Small Firms Handicapped", Journal of Law and Economics, 47(1), pp.45~74 (2004)
  20. Leiderman, L., "Macroeconometric Testing of the Rational Expectations and Structural Neutrality Hypotheses for the United States", Journal of Monetary Economics, 6(1), pp.69~82 (1980)
  21. Leiponen, A., "If You Cannot Block, You Better Run : Small Firms, Cooperative Innovation, and Appropriation Strategies", Research Policy, 38(9), pp.1478~1488 (2009)
  22. Lerner, J., "Patenting in the Shadow of Competitors", Journal of Law and Economics, 38(2), pp.463~495 (1995)
  23. MacKinlay, A. C., "Event Studies in Economics and Finance", Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), pp.13~39 (1997)
  24. Maloney, M., "The Complexity of Price Discovery in an Efficient Market : The Stock Market Reaction to the Challenger Crash", Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(4), pp.453~479 (2003)
  25. Marco, A., "The Value of Certainty in Intellectual Property Rights: Stock Market Reactions to Patent Litigation", ~ (2006)
  26. Michaely, R., "Price Reactions to Dividend Initiations and Omissions: Overreaction or Drift?", Journal of Finance, 50(2), pp.573~608 (1995)
  27. Mishkin, F. S., "Does Anticipated Monetary Policy Matter? An Econometric Investigation", Journal of Political Economy, 90(1), pp.22~51 (1982)
  28. Pagan, A., "Econometric Issues in the Analysis of Regressions with Generated Regressors", International Economic Review, 25(1), pp.221~247 (1984)
  29. Raghu, T., "Market Reaction to Patent Infringement Litigations in the Information Technology Industry", Information Systems Frontiers, 10, pp.61~75 (2008)
  30. Sargent, T. J., "A Classical Macroeconometric Model for the United States", Journal of Political Economy, 84(2), pp.207~237 (1976)
  31. Schwert, G. W., "Using Financial Data to Measure Effects of Regulation", Journal of Law and Economics, 24(1), pp.121~158 (1981)
  32. Somaya, D., "Strategic Determinants of Decisions not to Settle Patent Litigation", Strategic Management Journal, 24(1), pp.17~38 (2003)
  33. Weatherall, K., "Patent Enforcement : A Review of the Literature", Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(2), pp.312~343 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)