Effects of Revision Training on L2 Writing
2
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study purposes to examine the effects of two types of revision training (teacher feedback-aided and protocol-aided revision training) on L2 student writers’ revision and written product and quality, compared with their self-revision and also to analyze L2writers’ perceptions on revision training through a pre- and post-training questionnaire survey. The results of the study show positive effects of both types of training; more positive effects of teacher feedback-aided revision training on the quality and product of writing, especially in less proficient writers; more significant effects of protocol-based revision training on revision frequency, content changes, and success ratio of revision,especially in less-proficient writers; and more local (content preserving) revisions triggered by teacher feedback, especially in more proficient writers. Though teacher feedback-aided revision was favored over protocol-aided revision after training, the participants’ perception on the former’s positive effects and utilization rate decreased,but their perception on the latter’s positive effects and utilization rate enhanced. The present study suggests protocol-aided revision as an alternative revision method, and different revision methods depending on the focus of revision and L2 writing proficiency.
Abstract
This study purposes to examine the effects of two types of revision training (teacher feedback-aided and protocol-aided revision training) on L2 student writers’ revision and written product and quality, compared with their self-revision and also to analyze L2writers’ perceptions on revision training through a pre- and post-training questionnaire survey. The results of the study show positive effects of both types of training; more positive effects of teacher feedback-aided revision training on the quality and product of writing, especially in less proficient writers; more significant effects of protocol-based revision training on revision frequency, content changes, and success ratio of revision,especially in less-proficient writers; and more local (content preserving) revisions triggered by teacher feedback, especially in more proficient writers. Though teacher feedback-aided revision was favored over protocol-aided revision after training, the participants’ perception on the former’s positive effects and utilization rate decreased,but their perception on the latter’s positive effects and utilization rate enhanced. The present study suggests protocol-aided revision as an alternative revision method, and different revision methods depending on the focus of revision and L2 writing proficiency.
참고문헌 (51)
- Berg, E. C, "The effects of trained peer response ESL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, pp.215~241 (1999)
- Bitchener, J, "Evidence in support of written corrective feedback", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, pp.102~118 (2008)
- Bitchener, J, "The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback", System, 37, pp.322~329 (2009)
- 조윤경, "The Effectiveness of Peer Feedback in Korean EFL Writing Classrooms", 영어교육연구, 17(4), pp.33~59 (2005), 팬코리아영어교육학회
- Choi, Huyyun, "A study on Korean students’ perceptions on teachers’ feedback in English writing classes", 석사, pp.2002
- Choi, Yeonhee, "Effects of L2 writing proficiency and reader awareness on EFL students’ writing product and process on-line", The Journal of Asia TEFL, 3(2), pp.37~78 (2006)
- 최연희, "On-Line Revision Behaviors in EFL Writing Process", 영어교육, 62(4), pp.69~93 (2007), 한국영어교육학회
- Conrad, S. M, "ESL student revision after teacher-written comments: Text, contexts, and individuals", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, pp.147~180 (1999)
- Ellis, R, "The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context", System, 36, pp.353~371 (2008)
- Faigley, L, "Analyzing revision", College Composition and Communication, 32, pp.400~414 (1981)
- Ferris, D. R, "Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms", TESOL Quarterly, 29, pp.33~53 (1995)
- Ferris, D. R, "The influence of teacher commentary on student revision", TESOL Quarterly, 31, pp.315~339 (1997)
- Ferris, D. R, "Responding to writing. In Exploring second language writing", pp.119~140 (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Goldstein, L. M, "Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences", TESOL Quarterly, 24, pp.443~460 (1990)
- Hall, C, "Revision strategies in L1 and L2 writing tasks: A case study", 박사, pp.1987
- Hall, C, "Managing the complexity of revising across languages", TESOL Quarterly, 24, pp.43~60 (1990)
- Hayes, J. R, "A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications", pp.1~27 (1996), Lawrence Erbaum
- Hayes, J. R, "A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In Perspective on writing: Research, theory, and practice", pp.6~44 (2000), International Reading Association
- Hayes, J. R, "Cognitive processes in revision. In Advances in applied psycholinguistics, Vol 2: Reading, writing and language learning", pp.176~240 (1987), Cambridge University Press
- Hedgcock, J, "Feedback on feedback: Assessing learners' receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, pp.141~163 (1994)
- Holliway, D. R, "Audience perspective in young writers' composition and revising. In Revision: Cognitive and instructional process", pp.87~101 (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Hyland, F, "The impact of teacher-written feedback on individual writers", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, pp.255~186 (1998)
- Hyland, F, "Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, pp.185~212 (2001)
- Jones, S, "Discourses of difference? Questioning gender differences in linguistic characteristics of writing", Canadian Journal of Education, 30(2), pp.456~482 (2007)
- Jourderais, R, "Protocol analysis and SLA. In Cognition and second language acquisition", pp.354~375 (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Lee, I, "Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, pp.144~164 (2008)
- Lee, Jihye, "Hanguk daehaksaeng-euy yeongeo gulssugi sujeong jeonryak sayong-ey gwanhan saryey yeongu (A case study on the revision strategies of Korean university students’ English composition)", 석사, pp.2003
- Lee, Jeong-Won, "Gwajeongjooshim feedback-i yeongeo ssuginungryeok hyangsang-ey michinun yeonghyang (The effects of processbased feedback on the development of English writing proficiency)", English Teaching, 56(2), pp.265~285 (2001)
- Leki, I, "Coaching from the margins: Issues in written response. In Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.57~68 (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Lindgren, E, "Analysing online revision. In Studies in writing, Vol. 18: Computer keystroke logging and writing", pp.157~188 (2006), Elsevier
- Liou, H.-C, "Training effects on computer-mediated peer review", System, 37, pp.514~525 (2009)
- Lundstrom, K, "To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, pp.30~43 (2009)
- Min, H.-T, "Training students to become successful peer reviewers", System, 33, pp.293~308 (2005)
- Min, H.-T, "The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, pp.118~141 (2006)
- Nelson, G, "ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups", Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, pp.113~131 (1998)
- New, E, "Computer-aided writing in French as a foreign language: A qualitative and quantitative look at the process of revision", The Modern Language Journal, 83, pp.80~97 (1999)
- Phinney, M, "Computers, revision, and ESL writers: The role of experience", Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, pp.257~277 (1993)
- Raimes, A, "What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing", TESOL Quarterly, 19, pp.229~258 (1985)
- Sachs, R, "Learners’ uses of two types of written feedback on L2 writing revision tasks", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, pp.67~100 (2007)
- Sengupta, S, "An investigation into the effects of revision strategy instruction on L2 secondary school learners", System, 28, pp.97~113 (2000)
- Sommers, N, "Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers", College Composition and Communication, 31, pp.378~388 (1980)
- Sommers, N, "Responding to student writing", College Composition and Communication, 33, pp.148~156 (1982)
- Stanley, J, "Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators", Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, pp.217~233 (1992)
- Stevenson, M, "Journal of Second Language Writing", Writing, 15, pp.201~233 (2006)
- Stratman, J. F, "Reactivity in concurrent think-aloud protocols: Issues for research. In Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology", pp.89~112 (1994), Sage
- Truscott, J, "The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes", Language Learning, 46, pp.327~369 (1996)
- Van Waes, L, "Writing profiles: The effect of the writing mode on pausing and revision patterns of experienced writers", Journal of Pragmatics, 33, pp.829~853 (2003)
- Yang, M, "A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, pp.179~200 (2006)
- Zamel, V, "Writing: The process of discovering meaning", TESOL Quarterly, 16, pp.195~209 (1982)
- Zamel, V, "The composing process of advanced ESL students: Six case studies", TESOL Quarterly, 17, pp.165~187 (1983)
- Zamel, V, "Responding to student writing", TESOL Quarterly, 19, pp.79~102 (1985)
