脫冷戰 이후 테러리즘의超國家性 확산과 對應戰略
Proliferation of Transnational Terrorism andCounter Strategies in the Post-Cold War Era
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Following the Cold War era, violence has been reduced while the rapid flow of globalization has made its presence. There are constant efforts to overcome various crisis that continue to arise due to complicated international politics. It is important to note that this kind of threat has originated mostly from society, not from the political community. Weak nations, which see globalization as a threat of exploitation, inevitably form counter-hegemonic force against globalization. In addition, these conflicting values between weak nations and globalization will remain as a cause of complications, disruption, violence and trouble. The weak nations, suppressed by the logic driven by the stronger nations in international relations, will use armed force as a means of revolting against the existing governing order and disparages in that order, while on the other hand, the rulers, which are stronger nations, will use military power against the weak nations in response to their challenge and resistance to maintain their identity. This process was defined as terrorism. In the post-Cold War era, there has been little possibility of outright inter-state warfare, but the possibility of identity-based dispute has been on the rise. Conflicts between races, nations, regions and countries throughout the process of globalization could cause various forms of terrorism anywhere in the world. Recently, terrorism has reorganized as an asymmetrical threat to national security used to reach a particular political goal. This study defines the concept of terrorism, which has risen as a new, complex dispute from the perspective of international political studies, and establishes the fundamental causes of modern terrorism. In addition, it focuses on the background of the proliferation of transnational terrorism and international counter-strategies against terrorism. Considering the strategy and tactics of using minor disputes for their purposes, and the latent treat of cyber-terror and Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in the future, a global, multilateral anti-terrorism efforts should be developed. It is necessary to establish a more powerful international organization with the authority to exercise its role without interference, requiring all nations to change their original way of thinking, cooperate and maintain a positive manner. However, these measures could never be the fundamental solution to terrorism. To eliminate terrorism, an inevitable tool of weak nations vying to survive the process of globalization, the most important task is to put efforts into guaranteeing indiscriminate human rights. Also, rather than looking at management of the world order from an individual standpoint, such as the doctrine of Pax Americana, it is more important to follow the international order so as to maintain universal peace.
Abstract
Following the Cold War era, violence has been reduced while the rapid flow of globalization has made its presence. There are constant efforts to overcome various crisis that continue to arise due to complicated international politics. It is important to note that this kind of threat has originated mostly from society, not from the political community. Weak nations, which see globalization as a threat of exploitation, inevitably form counter-hegemonic force against globalization. In addition, these conflicting values between weak nations and globalization will remain as a cause of complications, disruption, violence and trouble. The weak nations, suppressed by the logic driven by the stronger nations in international relations, will use armed force as a means of revolting against the existing governing order and disparages in that order, while on the other hand, the rulers, which are stronger nations, will use military power against the weak nations in response to their challenge and resistance to maintain their identity. This process was defined as terrorism. In the post-Cold War era, there has been little possibility of outright inter-state warfare, but the possibility of identity-based dispute has been on the rise. Conflicts between races, nations, regions and countries throughout the process of globalization could cause various forms of terrorism anywhere in the world. Recently, terrorism has reorganized as an asymmetrical threat to national security used to reach a particular political goal. This study defines the concept of terrorism, which has risen as a new, complex dispute from the perspective of international political studies, and establishes the fundamental causes of modern terrorism. In addition, it focuses on the background of the proliferation of transnational terrorism and international counter-strategies against terrorism. Considering the strategy and tactics of using minor disputes for their purposes, and the latent treat of cyber-terror and Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) in the future, a global, multilateral anti-terrorism efforts should be developed. It is necessary to establish a more powerful international organization with the authority to exercise its role without interference, requiring all nations to change their original way of thinking, cooperate and maintain a positive manner. However, these measures could never be the fundamental solution to terrorism. To eliminate terrorism, an inevitable tool of weak nations vying to survive the process of globalization, the most important task is to put efforts into guaranteeing indiscriminate human rights. Also, rather than looking at management of the world order from an individual standpoint, such as the doctrine of Pax Americana, it is more important to follow the international order so as to maintain universal peace.
참고문헌 (33)
- 하영선, "변환의 세계정치", pp.102~ (2007), 을유문화사
- 김응수, "테러리즘의 초국가성 확산과 대응전략에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.2008
- Andreas Boeckh, "Internationale Beziehungen, Lexikon der Politik, Bd. 6", pp.257~ (1993), Beck
- Martin Van Creveld, "The Transformation of War", pp.57~ (1991), The Free Press
- Walter Laqueur, "The New Terrorism: Fanaticism and the Arms of Mass Destruction", pp.26~ (1999), Oxford University Press
- Martin E. Marty, "Fundamentalisms observed" (1991), Univ. of Chicago Press
- 구춘권, "지구화, 현실인가 또 하나의 신화인가" (2000), 책세상
- 여영무, "국제테러리즘 연구", pp.573~ (2006), 한국해양전략연구소
- Michael Chandler and Tohan Gunaratna, "Countering Terrorism", pp.23~ (2007), Reaktion Books Ltd
- Christine Buchholz u. a., "Unsere Welt ist keine Ware", pp.69~ (2002), Verlag Kiepenheuer & Witsch
- Kai Hirschmann, "Terrorismus" (2003), Europäische Verlagsanstalt
- 제성호, "테러자금조달억제협약에 대한 국제법적 고찰", 대테러연구논총, (4), pp.5~ (2007), 국가정보원
- 구춘권, "메가테러리즘과 미국의 세계질서전쟁", pp.77~ (2007), 책세상
- 11 World, "Terrorism and Counterterrorism: Understanding Threats and Responses in the Post-9", pp.2006, Nacos, Brigitte L.
- 대천광일, "테러의 이해", pp.85~
- Harald Müllar, "Amerika schlägt zurük. Die Weltordnung nach dem 11. September, p.66", ~
- 문광건, "뉴테러리즘의 오늘과 내일", pp.63~64 (2003), 한국국방 연구원
- 이서항, "세계 WMD 문제의 현황과 대책", 국제문제, 34(3), pp.17~ (2003), 국제문제 연구소
- Martha C. Hutchinson, "Defining Future Threats: Terrorist and Nuclear Proliferation", pp.149~152 (1977), John Jay Press
- 송재형, "대량살상무기(WMD) 테러리즘의 확산 가능성과 대응의 한계", 박사, pp.2008
- 국가정보원, "국가정보보호백서", pp.67~ (2002)
- U.S. Department of Defense, "the Quadrennial Defense Review Report" (2006)
- Robert W. Cox, "Production, Power and World Order, Social Forces in the Making of History", pp.211~217 (1987), Columbia Univ. Press
- Robert W. Cox, "Approaches to World Order", pp.129~131 (1996), Cambridge University Press
- Francis Fukuyama, "기로에 선 미국-딜레마에 빠진 네오콘과 미국, 세계는 어떻게 달라질 것인가" (2006), 랜덤하우스코리아
- Joseph. Nye, Jr., "Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics", pp.181~182
- David C. Rapoport, "The Fourth Wave: September 11 in the History of Terrorism", Current History, 100(650), pp.422~ (2001)
- "International Counter- Terrorism Instruments"[URL]
- 김영호, "9⋅11 이후 다자적 대테러 협력의 형성과 향후 전망", 대테러정책연구논총, (5) (2008), 국가정보원
- "Counter-Terrorism Committee and its Executive Directorate"[URL]
- 외교안보연구원, "PSI의 최근 진전상황과 주요쟁점 in: 주요국제문제 분석", pp.3~ (2004), 외교안보 연구원
- 한반도 주변정세와 한국의 대응방안, "김태준", 국회사무처, 2006년 국회 연구보고서, 22~25
- Jonathan B. Tucker, "Toxic Terror: Assessing Terrorist Use of Chemical and Biological Weapons", pp.156~ (2000), MIT Press
