본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

두 개의 임플란트를 이용한 3본 고정성 국소의치에서 가공치 위치에 따른 하악골에서의 응력 분포 및 변형에 관한 삼차원 유한요소법적 연구

The three dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution and deformation in mandible according to the position of pontic in two implants supported three-unit fixed partial denture

손충렬|김규남|김일규|박태환|김동수|장금수
대한구강악안면외과학회 (Korean Association Of Oral And Maxillofacial Surgeons)|2008.04|대한구강악안면외과학회지 (Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons)|제34권 제2호|pp. 166-179

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Implant supported fixed partial dentureThree dimensional finite element analysisvon-Mises stress
주제분류치의학

초록

Excessive concentration of stress which is occurred in occlusion around the implant in case of the implant supported fixed partial denture has been known to be the main cause of the crestal bone destruction. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the stress analysis on supporting tissue to get higher success rates of implant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of stress distribution and deformation in 3 different types of three-unit fixed partial denture supported by two implants, using a three dimensional finite element analysis in a three dimensional model of a whole mandible. A mechanical model of an edentulous mandible was generated from 3D scan, assuming two implants were placed in the left premolars area. According to the position of pontic, the experiments groups were divided into three types. Type I had a pontic in the middle position between two implants, type II in the anterior position, and type III in the posterior position. A 100-N axial load was applied to sites such as the central fossa of anterior and posterior implant abutment, central fossa of pontic, the connector of pontic or the connector between two implants, the mandibular boundary conditions were modeled considering the real geometry of its four-masticatory muscular supporting system. The results obtained from this study were as follows; 1. The mandible deformed in a way that the condyles converged medially in all types under muscular actions. In comparison with types, the deformations in the type II and type III were greater by 2-2.5 times than in the type I regardless of the loading location. 2. The values of von Mises stresses in cortical and cancellous bone were relatively stable in all types, but slightly increased as the loading position was changed more posteriorly. 3. In comparison with type I, the values of von Mises stress in the implant increased by 73% in Type II and by 77% in Type III when the load was applied anterior and posterior respectively, but when the load was applied to the middle, the values were similar in all types. 4. When the load was applied to the centric fossa of pontic, the values of von Mises stress were nearly 30􀅭35% higher in the type III than type I or II in the cortical and cancellous bone. Also, in the implant, the values of von Mises stress of the type II or III were 160􀅭170% higher than in the type I. 5. When the load was applied to the centric fossa of implant abutment, the values of von Mises stress in the cortical and cancellous bone were relatively 20􀅭25% higher in the type III than in the other types, but in the implant they were 40-45% higher in the type I or II than in the type III. According to the results of this study, musculature modeling is important to the finite element analysis for stress distribution and deformation as the muscular action causes stress concentration. And the type I model is the most stable from a view of biomechanics. Type II is also a clinically acceptable design when the implant is stiff sufficiently and mandibular deformation is considered. Considering the high values of von Mises stress in the cortical bone, type III is not thought as an useful design.

Abstract

Excessive concentration of stress which is occurred in occlusion around the implant in case of the implant supported fixed partial denture has been known to be the main cause of the crestal bone destruction. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the stress analysis on supporting tissue to get higher success rates of implant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of stress distribution and deformation in 3 different types of three-unit fixed partial denture supported by two implants, using a three dimensional finite element analysis in a three dimensional model of a whole mandible. A mechanical model of an edentulous mandible was generated from 3D scan, assuming two implants were placed in the left premolars area. According to the position of pontic, the experiments groups were divided into three types. Type I had a pontic in the middle position between two implants, type II in the anterior position, and type III in the posterior position. A 100-N axial load was applied to sites such as the central fossa of anterior and posterior implant abutment, central fossa of pontic, the connector of pontic or the connector between two implants, the mandibular boundary conditions were modeled considering the real geometry of its four-masticatory muscular supporting system. The results obtained from this study were as follows; 1. The mandible deformed in a way that the condyles converged medially in all types under muscular actions. In comparison with types, the deformations in the type II and type III were greater by 2-2.5 times than in the type I regardless of the loading location. 2. The values of von Mises stresses in cortical and cancellous bone were relatively stable in all types, but slightly increased as the loading position was changed more posteriorly. 3. In comparison with type I, the values of von Mises stress in the implant increased by 73% in Type II and by 77% in Type III when the load was applied anterior and posterior respectively, but when the load was applied to the middle, the values were similar in all types. 4. When the load was applied to the centric fossa of pontic, the values of von Mises stress were nearly 30􀅭35% higher in the type III than type I or II in the cortical and cancellous bone. Also, in the implant, the values of von Mises stress of the type II or III were 160􀅭170% higher than in the type I. 5. When the load was applied to the centric fossa of implant abutment, the values of von Mises stress in the cortical and cancellous bone were relatively 20􀅭25% higher in the type III than in the other types, but in the implant they were 40-45% higher in the type I or II than in the type III. According to the results of this study, musculature modeling is important to the finite element analysis for stress distribution and deformation as the muscular action causes stress concentration. And the type I model is the most stable from a view of biomechanics. Type II is also a clinically acceptable design when the implant is stiff sufficiently and mandibular deformation is considered. Considering the high values of von Mises stress in the cortical bone, type III is not thought as an useful design.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Bra􀆆nemark PI, "Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period", Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 16(suppl), pp.1~132 (1997)
  2. Skalak R, "Aspects of biomechanical considerations. In: Br?nemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T(eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry", pp.117~128 (1985), Chicago : Quintessence
  3. Matsushita Y, "Two-dimensional FEM analysis of hydroxyapatite implants diameter effects on stress distribution", J Oral Implantol, 16, pp.6~11 (1990)
  4. Boggan RS, "Influence of hex geometry and prosthetic table width on static and fatigue strength of dental implants", J Prosthet Dent, pp.436~440 (1999)
  5. Bunski JB, "Biomechanics of osseointegration and dental prosthesis”, osseointegration in oral rehabilitation", pp.133~156 (1993), London : Quintessence publishing Co
  6. Weinberg LA, "The biomechanics of force distribution in implantsupported prosthesis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 8, pp.19~31 (1993)
  7. Sertg¨oz A, G, "Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implantsupported fixed prosthesis", J Prosthet Dent, 76, pp.165~ (1996)
  8. Adell R, "A 15 year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaws", Int J Oral Surgery, 10, pp.387~ (1981)
  9. Rangert B, "Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 10, pp.326~ (1995)
  10. Balshi TJ, "An analysis and management of fractured implants", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 11, pp.660~ (1996)
  11. Morimoto K, "An experimental study on the tissue compatibility of the titanium bladevent implant coated with HAP-alumina in the semi-functional state", J Oral Implantol, 13, pp.387~401 (1987)
  12. Kohal RJ, "Three dimensional computerized stress analysis of commercially pure titanium and Yttrium-partially stabilized zirconia implants", Int J Prosthodont, 15, pp.189~194 (2002)
  13. Borchers L, "Three-dimensional stress distribution around a dental implant at different stages of interface development", J Dent Res, 62, pp.155~159 (1983)
  14. Lavernia CJ, "An analysis of stress in dental implant system", J Biomech, 14, pp.555~560 (1981)
  15. Rieger MR, "Finite element analysis of six endosseous implants", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.671~676 (1990)
  16. Vocht JWD, "Development of a finite element model to simulate and study the biomechanics of the temporomandibular joint", pp.1~9 (1999)
  17. Inou N, "Functional adaptation of mandibular bone. Computational Biomechanics", pp.23~42 (1996), Tokyo: Springer-Verjag
  18. Misch CE, "Implant-Protected Occlusion", Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent, 7, pp.25~ (1995)
  19. Hoshaw SJ, "Mechanical loading of Bra􀆆nemark implant affects interfacial bone remodeling and remodeling", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.345~360 (1994)
  20. Weinberg LA, "Biomechanical considerations when combining tooth-supported and implant-supported prostheses", Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol, 78, pp.22~27 (1994)
  21. Soltesz U, "Principal characteristics of the stress distribution in the jaw caused by dental implants. In Biomechanics: Principles and Applications", pp.439~ (1982), Martinus-Nijhoff, The Netherlands
  22. Rieger MR, "A finite element surgery of eleven endosseous implants", J Prosthet Dent, 63, pp.457~465 (1990)
  23. Meffert R, "Implant theraphy.Proceeding of the World workshop in clinical periodontics" (1989), Chicago American Academy of periodontology
  24. Wang TM, "Effects of prosthesis Materials and prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress Around Implants in poor-Quality : A numeric Analysis", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 17, pp.231~ (2002)
  25. Worthington P, "Osseointegration in Dentistry, An overview .2nd. ed", pp.56~ (2003), Quintessence books, Chicago, berlin, Tokyo, Copenhagen, London, Paris, Milan, Borcelona, Istanbul, Sao Paulo, Newdelhi, Moscow, Prague, and Warsaw
  26. Lum LB, "Load transfer from endosteal implants to supporting bone: An analysis using statics. Part two: Axial loading", J Oral Implantol, 18, pp.349~353 (1992)
  27. Misch CE, "Contemporary Implant dentistry 2nd ed" (1999), Mosby
  28. Koeck B, "¨ber die elastishe Deformation der Unterkieferspange", Dtsch Zahna ¨rztl Z, 33, pp.254~261 (1978)
  29. Picton DCA, "Distortion of the jaws during biting", Arch Oral Biol, 7, pp.573~580
  30. Mu ¨hlemann HR, "The mechanism of tooth mobility", J Periodont, 25, pp.128~135 (1954)
  31. Korioth TWP, "Deformation of the human mandible during simulated tooth clenching", J Dent Res, 73, pp.56~66 (1994)
  32. Cruz M, "Three-dimensional finite element stress analysis of a cuneiform-geometry implant", Int J Oral Maxillofac implants, 18, pp.675~684 (2003)
  33. Skalak R, "Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 49, pp.843~848 (1983)
  34. English G, "The cortical A-P spread", Implant Soc J, 1, pp.2~3 (1990)
  35. Worthington P, "The Swedish system of osseointegrated implants:problems and complications encountered during a four year trialperiod", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2, pp.77~84 (1987)
  36. Sones A, "Complications with osseointegrated implants", J Prosthet Dent, 62, pp.581~585 (1989)
  37. Akca K, "Iplikcioglu H: Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extension in mandibular posterior edentulism", J Oral Rehabilitation, 29, pp.350~356 (2002)
  38. Schwartzman B, "Load transfer by multiple implants under various prosthetic devices", J Dent Res, 70, pp.460~ (1991)
  39. White SN, "Effect of cantilever length on stress transfer by implant-supported prostheses", J Prosthet Dent, 71, pp.493~ (1994)
  40. Stegaroiu R, "Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three dimensionalFinite element stress analysis", Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants, 13, pp.82~ (1998)
  41. Kunavisarut C, "Finite element analysis ondental implant - supported prostheses without passive fit", JProsthodont, 11, pp.30~40 (2002)
  42. Wennstr¨om J, "Bone level change atimplant-supported fixed partial dentures with and without cantilever extension after 5 years in function", J Clin Periodontol, 31, pp.1077~1083 (2004)
  43. Reilly DT, "The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue", J Biomechanics, 8, pp.393~ (1975)

관련 논문AI추천

임플란트 고정성 보철물에서 수와 식립위치 변화에 따른 골과 임플란트에서의 응력분포에 관한 3차원 유한요소법적 연구이우현, 임종화, 조인호대한턱관절교합학회 · 구강회복응용과학지2010 · 제26권 제3호Effect of number of implants and cantilever design on stress distribution in three-unit fixed partial dentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis김성훈, 박지헌, 양재호, 이재봉, 한중석대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2008 · 제46권 제3호3차원 유한요소법에 의한 임플란트 지지 3본 고정성 가공 의치의 부적합도가 인접골 응력에 미치는 영향 분석이승환, 조광헌대한턱관절교합학회 · 구강회복응용과학지2012 · 제28권 제2호Three dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution around the mandibular posterior implant during non-working movement according to the amount of cantilever김명래, 김선종, 김현주, 박은진, 박지만대한치과보철학회 · The Journal of Advanced of Prosthodontics2014 · 제6권 제5호상악피개의치를 위한 임플랜트의 위치에 따른 응력분포에 대한 유한요소분석김명주, 김창회, 임영준, 하헌석대한치과보철학회 · 대한치과보철학회지2008 · 제46권 제2호2종의 임플란트 내부결합구조체에 따른 치조골상 유한요소응력 분석변욱, 김성량, 이창희, 정다운, 한인혜대한턱관절교합학회 · 구강회복응용과학지2013 · 제29권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)

악관절환자에서 Synovial fluid에 대한 단백질체 분석에 관한 연구김태우, 변은선, 윤필영, 박태일, 박준우, 채창훈, 김상균, 김영균pp. 113-118가토 두개골 결손부에 이식된 Collagen bone filler (TERUPLUG.) 및 rhBMP-2의 골치유 능력김경욱, 김주훈, 김철환pp. 119-130Midazolam과 국소 마취제를 이용한 정맥 내 진정법 시 치과 환자에서 관찰되는 변화에 대한 연구김성곤pp. 131-134구강 편평세포암에서 E-cadherin 유전자의 과메틸화김영실, 박지영, 이원, 김창현, 박민규, 표성운pp. 135-1402002년도(사단법인）일본구강외과학회 지정연수기관이 검진한 구강악안면영역의 악성종양에 관한 역학적 연구아리요시 야수노리, 야마모토 에쉬데, 오무라 켄, 세토 카니치, 시노하라 마사노리, 후지타 시게유키, 이마이 유타카, 시바 히로시즈, 미즈키 하루미, 시마하라 마사시pp. 141-150
원문 보기