大阪市住之江区北加賀屋地区における アーティスト集積地の形成と都市再生への影響
Development of The Artist Colony and Impact of Urban Regeneration: An Examination of Kitakagaya District in Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate influence of urban regeneration without gentrification forming an artist colony in Kitakagaya District, Suminoeku, Osaka, Japan. It uses a qualitative method based on Harvey's theory of Common and in-depth face-to-face interviews with local residents including planners, artists, and visitors as well as document analysis to present the district’s urban regeneration and gentrification. Accordingly, the study addressed the following four factors: 1) formation factors giving rise to the artist colony, 2) impact factors of urban regeneration, 3) ineffective factors of the gentrification, and 4) impact of artist colony formation on the district’s image as a cultural destination. It is possible to provide a conclusive, four-point explanation for these four major factors. First, the study highlights the important reasons for converting Kitakagaya District into an artist colony, as follows: artist poverty, possibility of reusing vacant factories and houses as cultural spaces, the potential social benefits of art projects, and realtor interest in regenerating the locality. Second, the expansion of the artists' activity basis and art projects enabled the broader community to collaborate with the artists in the urban regeneration of Kitakagaya District into a cultural destination with the readership of the Real Estate Company. Third, the artist colony has become common in the locality by gentrefication. The common maintain the artist colony, create the work environments for the artists, and encourage more artists to move into the district. Fourth, the revitalization of Kitakagaya District as a cultural destination represents the artist colony’s impact on the district. Artistic and cultural activities encourage social and cultural interaction that positively influences visitors and residents alike. Thus, Kitakagaya District’s artist colony has been revitalized as a cultural destination at which visitors are able to buy artists’products and experience local culture. In conclusion, in the case of Kiatakagaya District, it has a different aspect from traditional artist colony as artists’displacement and rise in property prices due to gentrification in that the distric's urban regeneration involved in an artist colony had been maintained and managed as common by controal the real estate company.
참고문헌 (36)
- 李ロウン, "工業衰退地とその近傍における文化芸術活動を基点とした地域再生に関する研究", 博士, 工学研究科, pp.2017
- Helguera, P., "ソ一シャリ一·エンゲイジド·ア一ト入門―ア一トが社会と深く関わるための10のポイント―", pp.27~40 (2015), フィルムア一ト社
- 井上真央, "現代日本におけるオルタナティブ·スペースをめぐる諸問題", 文化動態論篇, 48, pp.73~94 (2014)
- 工藤安代, "パブリックア一トの政策", pp.1~18 (2008), 勁草書房
- 熊倉純子, "ア一トプロジェクト(芸術と共創する社会)", pp.1~3 (2014), 水曜社
- 熊倉純子, "日本型ア一トプロジェクトの歴史と現在 1990年→2012年」", pp.3~12 (2015), 公益財団法人東京都歴史文化財団
- 後藤和子, "ア一トで都市のポテンシャルを高める基礎条件とは", 都市問題, 99(1), pp.46~54 (2008)
- 佐藤茂之, "ア一トゾ一ンデザイン", pp.371~381 (2016), 同友館
- 笹島秀晃, "SoHoにおける芸術家街の形成とジェントリフィケ一ション", 日本都市社会学会年報, 32, pp.65~80 (2014)
- 新田秀樹, "アメリカの非営利芸術機関と地域社会－4つのオ一ルタナティブ·スペ一スの事例レポ一ト一", 宮城教育大学紀要, 35, pp.165~173 (2000)
- 清水麻帆, "グロ一バル経済下における芸術地区による都市の再生と維持可能性に関する一考察－香港·火炭に関する事例研究－", 日本都市学会誌, 11, pp.28~46 (2011)
- Zukin,S., "パブリックア一トニュ一ヨ一ク創造地区のライフサイクルをたどる－", 空間·社会·地理思想, 15, pp.109~118 (2011)
- 菅豊, "現代的コモンズに内在する排除性の問題", 大原社会問題研究所, (655), pp.19~32 (2013)
- 田中研之輔, "ジェントリフィケ一ションに関する認識論的枠組み：序説", 地域イノベ一ション, 4, pp.75~79 (2012)
- ハ一ヴェイ, "反乱する都市", pp.25~60 (2013), 作品社
- Bishop,C, "人工地獄―現代ア一トと観客の政治学―", pp.297~332 (2016), フィルムア一ト社
- 吉田隆之, "トリエンナ一レはなにをめざすのか-都市型芸術祭の意義と展望", pp.11~31 (2015), 水曜社
- Bovone, Laura, "Fashionable Quarters in the Postindustrial City. The Ticinese of Milan", City & Community, 4(4), pp.359~380 (2005)
- Butler, T, "For gentrification?", Environment and planning A, 39, pp.162~181 (2007)
- Cameron, S., "Art, gentrification and regeneration-From artist as pioneer to public arts", European Journal of Housing Policy, 5, pp.39~58 (2005)
- Deener, A., "Commerce as the structure and symbol of neighborhood life: reshaping the meaning of community in Venice. California", City & Community, 6, pp.291~314 (2007)
- Deutsche, R., "The Fine Art of Gentrification", 91~111 (1984)
- Florida, R, "The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life", pp.328~ (2002), Perseus Book Group
- Harris, A, "Art and gentrification: pursuing the urban pastoral in Hoxton, London", Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(2), pp.226~241 (2012)
- Harvey, D, "Space of Capital : towards a critical geography", pp.38~67 (2001), Routledge
- Hess, C, "Understanding Knowledge as Commons: From Theory to Practive", pp.4~ (2007), The MIT Press
- Ley, D, "Artists, Aestheticisation and Field of Ggentrification", Urban Studies, 40(20), pp.2527~2544 (2003)
- Lloyd, R, "Neo Bohemia : Art and Neighborhood Redevelopment in Chicago", Journal of Urban Affairs, 24, pp.517~532 (2002)
- Lloyd, R, "The Neighborhood in Cultural Production: Material and Symbolic Resources in the New Bohemia", City & Community, 3(4), pp.343~372 (2004)
- Lloyd, R, "Neo-Bohemia: Art and Commerce in the Postindustrial City", pp.49~208 (2010), Routledge
- Moreton, S, "The Promise of the Affordable Artist’s Studio: Governing Creative Spaces in London", Environment and Planning A, 45(2), pp.421~437 (2013)
- Pratt, A., "Urban Regeneration: From the Arts Feel Good Factor to the Cultural Economy: A Case Study of Hoxton", TUrban Studies, 46(5-6), pp.1041~1061 (2009)
- Smith, N., "ジェントリフィケ一ションと報復都市", pp.3~115 (2014), ミネルヴァ書房
- Zukin, S, "Loft Living : Culture and Capital in Urban Change" (1982), John Hopkins University Press
- Zukin, S, "Gentrification: culture and capital in the urban core", Annual Review of Sociology, 13, pp.129~147 (1987)
- Zukin, S, "The Culture of Cities", pp.1~186 (1995), Blackwell