본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Trend Analysis on the Qualitative Research of Dental Hygiene in Korea (2000∼2023)

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

Background: This study aimed to analyze trends in qualitative research within the field of dental hygiene, focusing on papers published in Korean journals from 2000 to 2023. As dental hygienists play a crucial role in preventive oral health, understanding the breadth and depth of qualitative research in this field is essential for advancing practice and education. Methods: This descriptive survey research study analyzed 23 qualitative studies using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) as a framework. Studies were selected through a comprehensive search of Korean databases. The analysis covered research topics, participant types, methodological approaches, and adherence to COREQ domains, including “Research Team and Reflexivity,” “Study Design,” and “Analysis and Findings.” Results: The analysis revealed that most studies employed a phenomenological methodology (36.4%). Additionally, 87.0% of the studies mentioned Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and only 8.7% utilized qualitative data analysis software. The studies primarily focused on oral care for the elderly, communication, and the experiences of dental hygienists. Furthermore, 95.7% of the studies included participant quotations, but only 56.5% checked data saturation. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for a more diverse methodological approach in dental hygiene research. Journals should also emphasize strict adherence to IRB guidelines and encourage the use of qualitative data analysis software to enhance the rigor of research. By strengthening the systematic foundation of qualitative research in dental hygiene, the field can better address clinical challenges and expand the understanding of dental hygienists’ work environments.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to analyze trends in qualitative research within the field of dental hygiene, focusing on papers published in Korean journals from 2000 to 2023. As dental hygienists play a crucial role in preventive oral health, understanding the breadth and depth of qualitative research in this field is essential for advancing practice and education. Methods: This descriptive survey research study analyzed 23 qualitative studies using the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) as a framework. Studies were selected through a comprehensive search of Korean databases. The analysis covered research topics, participant types, methodological approaches, and adherence to COREQ domains, including “Research Team and Reflexivity,” “Study Design,” and “Analysis and Findings.” Results: The analysis revealed that most studies employed a phenomenological methodology (36.4%). Additionally, 87.0% of the studies mentioned Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and only 8.7% utilized qualitative data analysis software. The studies primarily focused on oral care for the elderly, communication, and the experiences of dental hygienists. Furthermore, 95.7% of the studies included participant quotations, but only 56.5% checked data saturation. Conclusion: This study highlights the need for a more diverse methodological approach in dental hygiene research. Journals should also emphasize strict adherence to IRB guidelines and encourage the use of qualitative data analysis software to enhance the rigor of research. By strengthening the systematic foundation of qualitative research in dental hygiene, the field can better address clinical challenges and expand the understanding of dental hygienists’ work environments.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Lee ET, "Qualitative exploration of trends in qualitative research in the field of educational technology in Korea", J Korean Assoc Educ Inf Media, 28, pp.77~104 (2022)[DOI]
  2. Creswell JW, "Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches", pp.65~110 (2013), Sage Publications
  3. Goong HS, "The analysis of research trends of elderly in the dental hygiene discipline", J Dent Hyg Sci, 18, pp.201~209 (2018)[DOI]
  4. Kang YJ, "Analysis of Journal of Dental Hygiene Science research trends using keyword network analysis", J Dent Hyg Sci, 18, pp.380~388 (2018)[DOI]
  5. Kang BW, "The research trends of papers in the Journal of Korean Society of Dental Hygiene", J Korean Soc Dent Hyg, 10, pp.991~1000 (2010)
  6. Yang JA, "An analysis of research trend on infection control in dental hygiene : a scoping review", J Korean Soc Dent Hyg, 23, pp.1~11 (2023)[DOI]
  7. Lim SR, "An analysis of domestic research trends related to professionals in dental hygiene", J Korean Dent Hyg Sci, 5, pp.123~144 (2022)[DOI]
  8. Kwon JY, "Analysis of dental hygiene ethics research trends through descriptive literature review (2000-2022)", J Korean Contents Assoc, 23, pp.389~399 (2023)[DOI]
  9. Im AJ, "A systematic review of Korean research trends in dental fear between 2007-2017", J Korean Soc Dent Hyg, 18, pp.607~620 (2018)[DOI]
  10. Tong A, "Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research(COREQ) : a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups", Int J Qual Health Care, 19, pp.349~357 (2007)[DOI]
  11. Kwon KI, "Trend analysis of qualitative research on counseling psychology area(2000~2012)", Korea J Couns, 14, pp.3871~3893 (2013)
  12. Shin HW, "Trend analysis of qualitative research in nursing(2011~2020)", J Qual Res, 22, pp.61~73 (2021)[DOI]
  13. Kim EG, "Analysis of tasks and education needs for dental hygienist for development of dental hygiene curriculum", J Dent Hyg Sci, 14, pp.35~42 (2014)
  14. Yi MS, "Qualitative research", pp.2~9 (2018), Soomoonsa
  15. Kim H, "Methodological assessment of qualitative research with caregivers in pediatric disease by COREQ(Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research)guideline", J Pediatr Korean Med, 32, pp.121~140 (2018)[DOI]
  16. Creswell JW, "Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches", pp.155~160 (2017), Sage Publications
  17. Guest G, "How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes", Field Methods, 29, pp.3~22 (2017)[DOI]
  18. Fusch PI, "Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research", Qualitative Rep, 20, pp.1408~1416 (2015)[DOI]
  19. Brantlinger E, "Qualitative studies in special education", Except Child, 71, pp.195~207 (2005)[DOI]
  20. Jang HY, "Analysis of qualitative research published in nursing journals in a recent 10-year period : focused on JKAN and ANR", J Qual Res, 20, pp.100~112 (2019)[DOI]
  21. Lee EJ, "Analysis on reports of qualitative researches published in Korean Journal of Women Health Nursing", Korean J Women Health Nurs, 18, pp.321~332 (2012)[DOI]
  22. Irvine A, "‘Am I not answering your questions properly?’ Clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews", Qualitative Research, 13, pp.87~106 (2013)[DOI]
  23. Turner DW, "Qualitative interview design : a practical guide for novice investigators", Qualitative Rep, 15, pp.754~760 (2010)[DOI]
  24. Kim YK, "Analysis of qualitative research published by Korean Journal of Adult Nursing(1989-2011)", Korean J Adult Nurs, 23, pp.633~641 (2011)
  25. Park MH, "Awareness and attitudes regarding oral care intervention program based on community care for older adults at home : focusing on the grounded theory", J Korean Soc Dent Hyg, 23, pp.351~360 (2023)[DOI]
  26. Paulus T, "The discourse of QDAS : reporting practices of ATLAS. ti and NVivo users with implications for best practices", Int J Soc Res Methodol, 20, pp.35~47 (2015)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)