본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

과수 고품질 시설현대화 사업 효과분석 -사과와 포도를 중심으로-

Analyzing Impacts of Facility Modernization Policy for Improvement of Fruits Quality -Focus on Apples and Grapes-

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

The Facility Modernization Policy for Improvement of Fruits Quality was implemented to improve the competitiveness of the domestic fruit tree sector, and as a result of analyzing samples of participating and non-participating farmers, it is judged to have contributed to the improvement of high-quality fruit production. As a result of analysis using the propensity score matching method, it was found that the Facility Modernization Policy for apple farms contributed to the improvement of fruit quality such as sweetness and high-quality product ratio. In addition, the fruit tree high-quality facility modernization project was found to reduce working hours by about 30 hours per 10a. In the case of grapes, it contributed to quality improvement, including increased sugar content, and reduced working hours by about 15.5 hours per 10a. This study has a limitation in that the number of samples subject to the survey is not large enough, and because of this, it appears that no statistically significant differences in performance variables such as production per unit area and management costs per unit area were found between participating and non-participating farms.

Abstract

The Facility Modernization Policy for Improvement of Fruits Quality was implemented to improve the competitiveness of the domestic fruit tree sector, and as a result of analyzing samples of participating and non-participating farmers, it is judged to have contributed to the improvement of high-quality fruit production. As a result of analysis using the propensity score matching method, it was found that the Facility Modernization Policy for apple farms contributed to the improvement of fruit quality such as sweetness and high-quality product ratio. In addition, the fruit tree high-quality facility modernization project was found to reduce working hours by about 30 hours per 10a. In the case of grapes, it contributed to quality improvement, including increased sugar content, and reduced working hours by about 15.5 hours per 10a. This study has a limitation in that the number of samples subject to the survey is not large enough, and because of this, it appears that no statistically significant differences in performance variables such as production per unit area and management costs per unit area were found between participating and non-participating farms.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Jung, H. J., "Ana lysis of Facility Modernization Policy Effect for Improvement of Fruit Quality", Korean Journal of Agricultural Management and Policy, 48(1), pp.83~105 (2021)
  2. Kim, D, H., "Perception Disparities in Agriculture and Rural Areas : Insights from Rural Residency Experience", Journal of Rural Development, 46(2), pp.21~44 (2023)
  3. Khandker, S., "Handbook on Impact Evaluation : Quantitative Methods and Practices" (2010), The World Bank
  4. 2023 Performance Management Implementation Plan, "MAFRA", ~ (2023)
  5. Min, I. S., "STATA Advanced statistical analysis", Jipil Media, ~ (2021)
  6. Moon, H. P., "Achievements and improvement directions of FTA domestic complementary measures", Agricultural policy focus, 91 (2014), Korea Rural Economic Institute
  7. Park, M. S., "A Measurement on the Economic Effects of Facility Modernization Policy for Improvement of Fruits Quality", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 8(5), pp.581~586 (2017)
  8. Park, M. S., "Analysis of the impact of meal regularity on adult obesity", Journal of Rural Development, 9(3), pp.79~122 (2016)
  9. Park, J. K., "Evaluation of 2014 FTA domestic supplementary measures and future tasks", Agricultural policy focus, 112, pp.1~24 (2014), Korea Rural Economic Institure
  10. Rosenbaum, P. R., "The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects", Biometrika, 70(1), pp.41~55 (1983)
  11. Rubin, D, "Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies", Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), pp.688~701 (1974)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)