의료인 업무범위 관련 법률 고찰
Study on Laws related to the Scope of Both Medical Doctors’ Practice in Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective : This study was aimed to reassess the scope of practice for medical personnel based on laws. Method : The law specifying the scope of practice for medical personnel has been selected searching Korean Law Information Center(https://www.law.gov.kr). The result was categorized as ‘examination, diagnosis, treatment, procedure, prescription, and others’. Results : The laws related to medical procedures were divided into three categories: diagnosis, treatments, and public health and others. In the field of diagnosis, traditional Korean medicine practitioners are generally allowed to play a role. However, some laws specify that only medical doctors can be the primary authorities for diagnosing infectious diseases. In the area of treatments, particularly in emergency medical situations, only medical doctors or nurses are typically mentioned. There are debates in the field of public health and other areas concerning issues such as vaccination, disability diagnosis, and the qualifications for health center directors. A reevaluation is also needed for the Occupational Safety and Health Act, where only medical doctors are set as the personnel standard for workers’ health examinations. Conclusion : To safeguard and promote the health of the citizens, there is a need for a clear definition of the licensure and scope of practice for healthcare professionals. Consistent interpretation of conflicting provisions among various laws and clear criteria for the term ‘physician’ in legal contexts are essential.
Abstract
Objective : This study was aimed to reassess the scope of practice for medical personnel based on laws. Method : The law specifying the scope of practice for medical personnel has been selected searching Korean Law Information Center(https://www.law.gov.kr). The result was categorized as ‘examination, diagnosis, treatment, procedure, prescription, and others’. Results : The laws related to medical procedures were divided into three categories: diagnosis, treatments, and public health and others. In the field of diagnosis, traditional Korean medicine practitioners are generally allowed to play a role. However, some laws specify that only medical doctors can be the primary authorities for diagnosing infectious diseases. In the area of treatments, particularly in emergency medical situations, only medical doctors or nurses are typically mentioned. There are debates in the field of public health and other areas concerning issues such as vaccination, disability diagnosis, and the qualifications for health center directors. A reevaluation is also needed for the Occupational Safety and Health Act, where only medical doctors are set as the personnel standard for workers’ health examinations. Conclusion : To safeguard and promote the health of the citizens, there is a need for a clear definition of the licensure and scope of practice for healthcare professionals. Consistent interpretation of conflicting provisions among various laws and clear criteria for the term ‘physician’ in legal contexts are essential.
참고문헌 (16)
- "의료법 제1장제2조", ~
- 정규원, "의사의 의료행위와 한의사의 한방의료행위의 범위와 한계", 의료법학, 19(3), pp.3~24 (2018), 대한의료법학회[DOI]
- 신은주, "한의사의 초음파의료기기 사용과 의료인의 면허 외 의료행위에 대한 판례의 고찰 : 대법원 2016도21314 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로", 한국의료법학회지, 31(1), pp.7~34 (2023), 한국의료법학회
- "대법원 2022. 12. 22. 선고 2016도21314 판결", ~
- 박유리, "한의사와 의사의 업무 범위와 관련된 법령 고찰", 대한예방한의학회지, 18(3), pp.91~104 (2014), 대한예방한의학회
- "헌법재판소 2013. 2. 28.자 2011헌바398 전원합의체 결정", ~
- 최혁용, "한의사의 면허외 행위 판단의 새로운 기준 -대법원 2022. 12. 22. 선고 2016도21314 전원합의체 판결을 중심으로-", 의료법학, 24(1), pp.131~155 (2023), 대한의료법학회
- "서울행정법원 2023. 11. 23. 2022구합63317 판결", ~
- "서울고등법원 (인천) 2023. 6. 9. 선고 2020나11351 판결", ~
- "학교보건법 제15조의 2(응급처치 등) 1항", ~
- "수원지법 2021. 02. 21. 2020고정388 판결", ~
- "“아쉬운 건 정부” 의사협회, 독감 사업 참여 거부 촉각" (2015), 최선[URL]
- "복지부 “의협, 예방접종 거부 없을 것으로 생각”" (2021), 곽성순[URL]
- WHO, "The organization and delivery of vaccination services in the European Union", ~ (2018)
- 김성태, "공공의료에 있어서 보건소장의 자격범위 확대에 관한 소고", 인문사회 21, 13(2), pp.1343~1354 (2022), 인문사회 21
- "보건소장에 의사면허 소지자 우선 임용은 차별" (2017), 국가인권위원회[URL]
