The Effects of Joint Education Programs on Cohesion among South Korean Military Academy Cadets
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this study is to examine the effects of the joint education programthat was newly constituted by the South Korean Army, Navy, and Air ForceAcademy in 2012 to improve the South Korean military’s joint operational capability. This paper investigates whether the joint education program bridged the culturalgaps that had existed historically among the armed services, resulting in a greaterexchange of camaraderie and information. The findings demonstrate the positiveimpact of a joint education program on the exchange of camaraderie. In the laterstage of joint education, military cadets are less likely to exchange camaraderiewith those who came from the same military academy; but they are more likely toexchange camaraderie with those who share the same room in the military barracks,and with those who participate in formal training in the same classroom. In comparisonto the exchange of camaraderie, however, the joint education program failed toproduce a collaborative atmosphere in which three random service academy cadetsactively exchanged information with one another. The South Korean case providesa model for building cohesion across different service members by using education,while also demonstrating its limitations.
Abstract
The goal of this study is to examine the effects of the joint education programthat was newly constituted by the South Korean Army, Navy, and Air ForceAcademy in 2012 to improve the South Korean military’s joint operational capability. This paper investigates whether the joint education program bridged the culturalgaps that had existed historically among the armed services, resulting in a greaterexchange of camaraderie and information. The findings demonstrate the positiveimpact of a joint education program on the exchange of camaraderie. In the laterstage of joint education, military cadets are less likely to exchange camaraderiewith those who came from the same military academy; but they are more likely toexchange camaraderie with those who share the same room in the military barracks,and with those who participate in formal training in the same classroom. In comparisonto the exchange of camaraderie, however, the joint education program failed toproduce a collaborative atmosphere in which three random service academy cadetsactively exchanged information with one another. The South Korean case providesa model for building cohesion across different service members by using education,while also demonstrating its limitations.
참고문헌 (25)
- Ian Horwood, "Interservice Rivalry and Air Power in the Vietnam War", pp.1~ (2006), Combat Studies Institute Press
- The South Korean Ministry of National Defense, "2012 Defense White Paper", pp.289~ (2012), MND
- Institute for Military History, "Fifty Years’ History of Foundation of Armed Forces" (1998), Institute for Military History, MND
- "The United States–Republic of Korea Alliance: A Global Partnership" (2014)[URL]
- Ministry of National Defense, "Defense White Paper 2006" (2006), MND
- Edward A. Shills, "Cohesion and Disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II", Public Opinion Quarterly, 12, pp.280~315 (1948)
- George Simmel, "The Sociology of George Simmel, trans. Kurt H. Wolff", pp.92~ (1950), Free Press
- George C. Homans, "The Human Group", pp.37~40 (1950), Harcourt, Brace and Co.
- Charles H. Cooley, "Social Organization", pp.23~ (1962), Schoken Books
- Guy L. Siebold, "The Essence of Military Group Cohesion", Armed Forces and Society, 33(3) (2007)
- David R. Segal, "The Future of the Army Profession", pp.453~ (2002), McGraw-Hill
- Omer Bartov, "Hitler’s Army: Soldiers, Nazis, and War in the Third Reich" (1991), Oxford University Press
- Anthony King, "The World of Command: Communication and Cohesion in the Military", Armed Forces and Society, 32(4), pp.494~ (2006)
- Leon Festinger, "Informal Social Communication", Psychological Review, 57(5), pp.272~281 (1950)
- Rosabeth M. Kanter, "Men and Women of the Corporation" (1977), Basic Books
- Ha Eo-young, "Military Criticized for Making things Tougher on Female Soldiers", The Hankyoreh, February 24, 2014, ~ (2014)
- Robert D. Putnam, "Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy" (1993), Princeton University Press
- Nan Lin, "Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action", pp.39~ (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Mark Granovetter, "The Strength of Weak Ties", American Journal of Sociology, 78(6) (1973)
- Mark Granovetter, "The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited", Sociological Theory, 1, pp.201~233 (1983)
- Uzi Ben-Shalom, "Cohesion During Military Operations:A Field Study on Combat Units in the Al-Aqsa Intifada", Armed Forces and Society, 32(1), pp.65~ (2005)
- Insoo Kim, "Collective Identity and Promotion Prospects in the South Korean Army", Armed Forces and Society, 40(2) (2014)
- Alice H. Eagly, "Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis", Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), pp.233~256 (1990)
- David Krackhardt, "Networks and Organization: Structure, Form, and Action", pp.237~238 (1992), Harvard Business School Press