본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

秦・漢 帝國 國家祭祀의 世俗化

Secularization of National Sacrifice in Qin and Han Empire

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

In ancient China, there were separate officials dedicated to deity at the beginning of history. They played a part in the construction, maintenance, and development of ancient nations, along with general officials in charge of monarchy. But the monarch’s judgment was to give priority to which gods should be the subject of the national sacrifice, and the role of the provincial governors as a monarch’s representative was prominent from the Warring States Period. From the unification of Warring States by Qin Empire and the reunification of Han Empire to the period of Xuandi(宣帝), the national sacrifice was organized around Five Mountains(五嶽) and Four Rivers(四瀆). In this process, shamans(巫) and magic officials(祝官) inside national regime and priests(方士) outside national regime played a leading role. However, in the continuation of national sacrifice, the provincial governors, who had coped with the superstitious sacrifices(淫祀) from the beginning, emerged as the center. In the end, the national sacrifice of Han Empire began to be built by sacrificial officials(祠官), but in the completion stage, administrative officials(縣官) who were the representative of the monarch replaced sacrificial officials(祠官). As the national sacrifice was dominated by administrative officials(縣官) who had no divine nature from the beginning, the national sacrifice was ritualized and secularized, free from its original magical and inhumane character. In this process, the provincial governors used the Confucian classics as a means of dealing with the sacrificial issues as well as the existing law. The Confucian classics have become a source of restraining the arbitrary judgment and the resulting law of the monarch and coping with sacrificial issues based on rational logic and universal persuasion.

Abstract

In ancient China, there were separate officials dedicated to deity at the beginning of history. They played a part in the construction, maintenance, and development of ancient nations, along with general officials in charge of monarchy. But the monarch’s judgment was to give priority to which gods should be the subject of the national sacrifice, and the role of the provincial governors as a monarch’s representative was prominent from the Warring States Period. From the unification of Warring States by Qin Empire and the reunification of Han Empire to the period of Xuandi(宣帝), the national sacrifice was organized around Five Mountains(五嶽) and Four Rivers(四瀆). In this process, shamans(巫) and magic officials(祝官) inside national regime and priests(方士) outside national regime played a leading role. However, in the continuation of national sacrifice, the provincial governors, who had coped with the superstitious sacrifices(淫祀) from the beginning, emerged as the center. In the end, the national sacrifice of Han Empire began to be built by sacrificial officials(祠官), but in the completion stage, administrative officials(縣官) who were the representative of the monarch replaced sacrificial officials(祠官). As the national sacrifice was dominated by administrative officials(縣官) who had no divine nature from the beginning, the national sacrifice was ritualized and secularized, free from its original magical and inhumane character. In this process, the provincial governors used the Confucian classics as a means of dealing with the sacrificial issues as well as the existing law. The Confucian classics have become a source of restraining the arbitrary judgment and the resulting law of the monarch and coping with sacrificial issues based on rational logic and universal persuasion.

참고문헌 (70)

  1. 甘肅省文物考古硏究所, "居延新簡" (1990), 文物出版社
  2. 徐元誥, "國語集解(修訂本)" (2002), 中華書局
  3. 十三經注疏整理委員會, "論語注疏(十三經注疏)" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  4. 陳偉, "秦簡牘合集" (2014), 武漢大學出版社
  5. 班固, "白虎通疏證" (1994), 中華書局
  6. 司馬遷, "史記" (1963), 中華書局
  7. 許愼, "說文解字注" (2007), 鳳凰出版社
  8. 湖南省文物考古硏究所, "蘇仙橋西晉簡(發掘簡報)" (2009), 嶽麓書社
  9. 司馬彪, "後漢書志" (1965), 中華書局
  10. 酈道元, "水經注疏" (1989), 江蘇古籍出版社
  11. 陳偉, "秦簡牘合集" (2014), 武漢大學出版社
  12. 陳松長, "嶽麓書院藏秦簡 4", pp.4~ (2015), 上海辭書出版社
  13. 吳則虞, "晏子春秋集釋" (1982), 中華書局
  14. 十三經注疏整理委員會, "禮記正義(十三經注疏)" (2000), 北京大學出版社
  15. 連雲港市博物館, "尹灣漢墓簡牘" (1997), 中華書局
  16. 陳偉, "里耶秦簡牘校釋 1", pp.1~ (2012), 武漢大學出版社
  17. 張春龍, "出土文獻" (2010), 中西書局
  18. 黃懷信, "逸周書彙校集注(修訂本)" (2007), 上海古籍出版社
  19. 彭浩, "二年律令與奏 讞書張家山二四七號漢墓出土法律文獻釋讀" (2007), 上海古籍出版社
  20. 蘇輿, "春秋繁露義證" (1992), 中華書局
  21. 王明, "抱朴子內篇校釋 內" (1986), 中華書局
  22. 應劭, "風俗通義校注" (1981), 中華書局
  23. 永田英正, "漢代石刻集成 圖版釋文篇" (1994), 同朋社
  24. 王先愼, "韓非子" (1998), 中華書局
  25. 班固, "漢書" (1964), 中華書局
  26. 胡平生, "懸泉置漢簡" (2001), 上海古籍出版社
  27. 常璩, "華陽國志" (1987), 上海古籍出版社
  28. 劉安, "淮南子" (1998), 中華書局
  29. 范曄, "後漢書" (1965), 中華書局
  30. 安作璋, "秦漢官制史稿 上" (1985), 齊魯書社
  31. 安作璋, "秦漢官制史稿 下" (1985), 齊魯書社
  32. 李雪山, "商代分封制度硏究" (2004), 中國社會科學出版社
  33. 班固, "漢書補注" (2008), 上海古籍出版社
  34. 張亞初, "西周金文官制硏究" (1986), 中華書局
  35. 張鶴泉, "周代祭祀硏究" (1993), 文津出版社
  36. 閻崇東, "兩漢帝陵 (歷代帝后陵寢硏究書系)" (2007), 中國靑年出版社
  37. 嚴耕望, "中國地方行政制度史 甲(秦漢地方行政制度)" (1990), 中央硏究院歷史語言硏究所
  38. 渡邉義浩, "後漢における儒敎國家の成立" (2009), 汲古書院
  39. 渡邉義浩, "後漢國家の支配と儒敎" (1995), 雄山閣
  40. 김동오, "秦帝國시기 縣廷의 구조 ― 『里耶秦簡 』 ‘令史’를 중심으로 ―", 동양사학연구, (126), pp.1~44 (2014), 동양사학회
  41. 김용찬, "古代 中國의 山川 祭祀와 국가 권력", 중국고중세사연구, (34), pp.1~42 (2014), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  42. 김용찬, "極廟에서 郊祀로―秦·漢 國家祭祀의 변화와 지속―", 전북사학, (57), pp.313~364 (2019), 전북사학회[DOI]
  43. 김용찬, "前漢의 地域 支配와 國家祭祀의 交融", 중국고중세사연구, (49), pp.35~77 (2018), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  44. 김용찬, "秦·漢 帝國의 기층 國家祭祀 운영 구조", 역사교육, (151), pp.345~387 (2019), 역사교육연구회[DOI]
  45. 김용찬, "漢代 孔子 祭祀와 국가 권력", 중국고중세사연구, (29), pp.19~61 (2013), 중국고중세사학회[DOI]
  46. 李成九, "古代中國의 理解 3" (1997), 知識産業社
  47. 李成珪, "東아시아의 人間像黃元九敎授定年紀念論叢" (1995), 혜안
  48. 이성규, "前漢 更卒의 徵集과 服役 方式 ― 松柏木牘 47호의 분석을 중심으로 ―", 동양사학연구, (109), pp.1~93 (2009), 동양사학회
  49. 李成珪, "秦의 地方行政組織과 그 性格縣의 組織과 그 機能을 中心으로", 東洋史學硏究, 31 (1989)
  50. 李成珪, "漢武帝의 西域遠征封禪黃河治水와 禹西王母神話", 東洋史學硏究, 72 (2000)
  51. 鄭夏賢, "邊太燮博士 華甲紀念 史學論叢" (1985), 三英社
  52. 寧可, "記《晉當利里社碑》", 文物, 1979(12) (1979)
  53. 董濤, "秦漢時期的祝官", 史學月刊, 2015(7) (2015)
  54. 黎虎, "殷代外交制度初探", 歷史硏究, 1988(5) (1988)
  55. 饒宗頤, "饒宗頤二十世紀學術文集 2" (2003), 新文豐出版股份有限公司
  56. 李零, "北大秦牘《泰原有死者》簡介", 文物, 2012(6) (2012)
  57. 鼂福林, "試論殷代的王權與神權", 社會科學戰線, 1984(4) (1984)
  58. 朱彥民, "由甲骨文看“史”字本義及其早期流變", 殷都學刊, 2015(4) (2015)
  59. 陳侃理, "秦簡牘復生故事與移風易俗", 簡帛, 8 (2013)
  60. 湖南省文物考古硏究所, "湖南郴州蘇仙橋遺址發掘簡報" (2009), 嶽麓書社
  61. 白川靜, "白川靜著作集 4(甲骨文と殷史)" (2005), 平凡社
  62. 小南一郞, "史の起源とその職能", 東方學, 98 (1999)
  63. 小島毅, "正祠と淫祠福建の地方志における記述と論理", 東洋文化硏究所紀要, 114 (1991)
  64. 松本浩一, "宋代の道敎と民間信仰" (2006), 汲古書院
  65. 仲山茂, "漢代の掾史", 史林, 81(4) (1998)
  66. 增淵龍夫, "中國古代の社會と國家" (1996), 岩波書店
  67. 板野長八, "儒敎成立史の硏究" (1995), 岩波書店
  68. 板野長八, "中國古代における人間觀の展開" (1972), 岩波書店
  69. 豊島靜英, "中國における國家の起源國家發生史上のアジアの道" (1999), 汲古書院
  70. 豊島靜英, "中國における階級支配の成立とその性格について", 歷史學硏究, 413 (1974)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)