魯迅의 글쓰기와 치유 ― ‘환등기 사건’을 중심으로
Lu Xun’s Writing and Healing Capacity: Focusing on the Lantern Slide Occasion
7
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Lu Xun becomes an interesting text in order to explore healing capacity embedded in writing. Starting his literary career, simultaneously giving up his medical school, Lu Xun exemplifies writing as an asset for a medical application. Writings of a philosopher, illuminator and revolutionary, Lu Xun’s texts require a careful reading regarding his conversations with the world. In this regard, the readings of the "lantern slide" occasion suggest Lu Xun’s literary career as a choice for self-healing. Instead of interpreting the experience as his literary enlightenment, I explore it as an origin of shame and despise directed to himself, which explains the reason for his preference of literature to medicine. Lu Xun sympathized with himself for spending his childhood as a beggar. Troubling with his suicidal impulse and matricidal drive, Lu Xun filled his life with a clinical pain. For Lu Xun, writing served as his self-healing machine. To this end, characters attempt to make conversations. Although narrative of conversation reveals incapacity, especially in pessimistic conditions, Lu Xun could not give up his belief in writing as in healing and subsequent consolation. Therefore, he continued to discover new literary dimensions such as childhood, fairy tales, and animal kingdoms. In addition, Lu Xun even destroyed basic narrative structure by interweaving his writings only with storytelling. Motivated by self-healing, Lu Xun, as a text, is even more significant in its extension to Chinese society; furthermore, Lu Xun’s thoughts of human freedom and liberty eventually justify his self-healing writing.
Abstract
Lu Xun becomes an interesting text in order to explore healing capacity embedded in writing. Starting his literary career, simultaneously giving up his medical school, Lu Xun exemplifies writing as an asset for a medical application. Writings of a philosopher, illuminator and revolutionary, Lu Xun’s texts require a careful reading regarding his conversations with the world. In this regard, the readings of the "lantern slide" occasion suggest Lu Xun’s literary career as a choice for self-healing. Instead of interpreting the experience as his literary enlightenment, I explore it as an origin of shame and despise directed to himself, which explains the reason for his preference of literature to medicine. Lu Xun sympathized with himself for spending his childhood as a beggar. Troubling with his suicidal impulse and matricidal drive, Lu Xun filled his life with a clinical pain. For Lu Xun, writing served as his self-healing machine. To this end, characters attempt to make conversations. Although narrative of conversation reveals incapacity, especially in pessimistic conditions, Lu Xun could not give up his belief in writing as in healing and subsequent consolation. Therefore, he continued to discover new literary dimensions such as childhood, fairy tales, and animal kingdoms. In addition, Lu Xun even destroyed basic narrative structure by interweaving his writings only with storytelling. Motivated by self-healing, Lu Xun, as a text, is even more significant in its extension to Chinese society; furthermore, Lu Xun’s thoughts of human freedom and liberty eventually justify his self-healing writing.
참고문헌 (17)
- 姜異新, "不是醫生, 是“病痛”―由『遠火』再談魯迅的“棄醫從文”", 魯迅硏究月刊, 1 (2007)
- 高遠東, "“仙臺經驗”與“棄醫從文”―對竹內好曲解魯迅文學發生原因的一點分析", 魯迅硏究月刊, 1 (2007)
- 郭紹虞, "中國歷代文論選(제1권)" (1996), 上海古籍出版社
- 魯迅, "魯迅全集 (1), (2), (4), (6), (7)" (2005), 人民文學出版社
- 武淑蓮, "痛苦: 生命的最高顔色―中國現代作家苦悶期創作與文學的“治療”作用", 唐山師範學院學報, 23(6)
- 呂曉英, "棄醫從文: 魯迅的言說策略", 魯迅硏究月刊, 1 (2008)
- 葉舒憲, "文學與治療―關于文學功能的人類學硏究", 中國比較文學, 2 (1998)
- 王苹, "喬依斯和魯迅比較硏究: 寫作和治療", 魯迅硏究月刊, 9 (2004)
- 李歐梵, "鐵屋中的吶喊" (2001), 河北敎育出版社
- 鄭懷林, "從『七發』看西漢時期生活方式病的文學治療思想", 陝西中醫學院學報, 6 (2008)
- 가오우 요시미츠, "몸으로 본 중국사상" (2007), 소나무
- 다케우치 요시미, "루쉰" (2003), 문학과지성사
- 마종기, "의학과 문학" (2004), 문학과지성사
- 리디아 리우, "언어횡단적 실천" (2005), 소명출판
- 왕후이, "죽은 불 다시 살아나―현대성에 저항하는 현대성" (2005), 삼인
- 이민용, "인문치료와 이야기치료- 『천일야화』를 중심으로", 뷔히너와 현대문학, 32, pp.259~284 (2009), 한국뷔히너학회
- 이보경, "중국적 근대성의 한 테제 “아이를 구하라” 再讀 ― 우생학적 기획으로 읽기", 중국현대문학, (35), pp.37~58 (2005), 한국중국현대문학학회
