통신사업자의 경품지급 및 차별적 요금할인행위 등의 규제에 관한 연구
Regulation of Granting Free Gifts, Rebates or Selective Price Discounts by Telecommunication Companies
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korea telecommunication markets are considered relatively competitive due at least in part to deregulation and privatization policies since the early 1990's. Nowadays it is common for telecommunication companies to grant free gifts or rebates and selective price discounts to users for promotion purposes. Those practices have been regulated by competition laws as well as telecommunication laws in many countries including Korea. Formerly, competition laws tended to regulate them harshly but this trend has changed drastically. For example, the Korea Fair Trade Commission amended the 'Free Gift Notice'in 2009 to abolish maximum limits on free gifts granted to consumers. One the other hand, price discriminations among telecommunication service users have been traditionally prohibited in many countries. The Korea Telecommunication Business Act and the law enforcement practices of the Korea Communication Commission seems to be one of the traditional strict regulatory approaches to selective price discounts and other promotion practices having similar discriminatory effects on users. However, such legislation and law enforcement should be reconsidered and move towards more relaxed approaches. The analysis of relevant common law and recent regulatory policy developments in leading countries shows that selective price discounts and promotion practices having similar effects may be pro-competitive and increase consumer welfares as well.
Abstract
The Korea telecommunication markets are considered relatively competitive due at least in part to deregulation and privatization policies since the early 1990's. Nowadays it is common for telecommunication companies to grant free gifts or rebates and selective price discounts to users for promotion purposes. Those practices have been regulated by competition laws as well as telecommunication laws in many countries including Korea. Formerly, competition laws tended to regulate them harshly but this trend has changed drastically. For example, the Korea Fair Trade Commission amended the 'Free Gift Notice'in 2009 to abolish maximum limits on free gifts granted to consumers. One the other hand, price discriminations among telecommunication service users have been traditionally prohibited in many countries. The Korea Telecommunication Business Act and the law enforcement practices of the Korea Communication Commission seems to be one of the traditional strict regulatory approaches to selective price discounts and other promotion practices having similar discriminatory effects on users. However, such legislation and law enforcement should be reconsidered and move towards more relaxed approaches. The analysis of relevant common law and recent regulatory policy developments in leading countries shows that selective price discounts and promotion practices having similar effects may be pro-competitive and increase consumer welfares as well.
참고문헌 (17)
- 이원우, "통신법상 개별약정의 허용성과 그 한계", 행정법연구, 16, pp.1~21 (2006), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- 이호영, "독점규제법의 이론과 실무" (2006), 홍문사
- 이호영, "規制産業과 公正去來法의 適用除外-Regulated Industries and Antitrust Exemptions-", 법학논총, 23(1), pp.1~34 (2006), 법학연구소
- 이호영, "전기통신사업법상 금지행위 규제의 개선 ― 이용자이익 저해행위를 중심으로 ―", 행정법연구, 20, pp.91~114 (2008), 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會)
- 2008년도 통계연보, "공정거래위원회", ~ (2009)
- 공정거래위원회, "독점규제 및 공정거래에 관한 법률 심결", ~
- "통신위원회 및 방송통신위원회 심결집, 2000-2009", ~ (2009)
- "ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Law Developments (6th ed.)", ~ (2007)
- "ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Consumer Protection Law Developments", ~ (2009)
- "13 Am. Jur. 2d Carriers § 2 (Common carriers)", ~
- Benjamin, "Telecommunications Law & Policy" (2001), Carolina Academic Press
- Charles H. Helein, "Detariffing and the Death of the Filed Tariff Doctrine: Deregulating in the Self Interest", Fed. Comm. L.J., 54 (2002)
- "86 Corpus Juris Secundum Telecomm § 70 (Discrimination-Federal Law)", ~
- James B. Speta, "A Common Carrier Approach to Internet Interconnection", Fed. Comm. L.J., 54 (2002)
- Jim Rossi, "Lowering the Filed Tariff Shield: Judicial Enforcement for a Deregulatory Era", Vanderbilt L. Rev., 55 (2003)
- Huber, "Federal Telecommunications Law (2d ed.)" (1999), Aspen Law & Business
- Matthew A. Edwards, "The Law, Marketing and Behavioral Economics of Consumer Rebates", Stan. J.L. Bus. & Fin., 12 (2007)
