日新齋 鄭義林의 性理說 硏究

Abstract

This is the first attempt to analyze Jung, eui-rim(鄭義林) who was one of the pupils of Nosa school which was one of the representative literati groups. Jung, one of the 3 major figures in Nosa school, had faithfully followed his teacher Ki Jung-jin’s Neo-confucian theory, and had made a great scholaric feat. Also having been cooperated with other scholars, Kim-Pyeong-mook and Choi Ik-hyun, he practically involved in the wijungchuksa movement, the anti political putrefaction and foreign influence movement. Especially, after the publication of the ‘Nosa collections’, which profoundly mentioned Ki’s Riqi theory, Kiho neo-confucian school scholars criticized severely on Eopil(猥筆), Napyanhsaeui(納凉私議). Jung counter-stated to the criticism. and moreover he sheded light on his and Nosa school’s scholaric objectivity to the world. Basically, Ki jung-jin’s Ri Ki theory concetrate on reinforcing Ri’s superintendency on Qi. He criticized Yul-gok’s Ri Ki theory and only acknowledged movement changes under ri’s superintendence. Kiho school scholars regared that he criticised Yul-gok in some themes. However, as his theory was analyzed, fundamentally he followed Yul-gok’s theory and fully achieved Ri’s inactivity and qi’s activity. Nosa school schoalrs including Jung had insisted that Ki jung-jin didn’t contradicted and criticised Yul-gol’s theory but tried to rectify bad successions and complemented Yul-gok’s theory. In this article, considering the situation of little known about the Nosa school, his biography, his place in the Nosa school, and his role in the debate on Ki Jung-jin’s Neo-confucian theory were fully explained. and how he understood and succeeded his teacher’s theory on riqiron and shimsungron were confirmed. Specifically, this article tried to shed light on how he correlated Ki jung-jin’s neoconfucian theory with Yul-gok’s theory among the disputes.