Validation of the Korean version of the Reflective Practice Questionnaire in clinical clerkship of Korean medical students
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study aims to verify whether the Reflective Practice Questionnaire (RPQ) developed by Priddis and Rogers is valid in the Korean context to identify the level of reflection of medical students in clinical practice. Methods: A total of 202 third- and fourth-year medical students from seven universities participated in the study. After receiving approval for use from the authors, a survey was conducted on the students through an adaptation process. The original scale consists of 10 factors with 40 items. The Self-efficacy in Clinical Performance Scale (SECP), Korean Self-reflection and Insight Scale (K-SRIS), and Reflection-in-Learning Scale (RinLS) were used to validate the scale. Exploratory factor, confirmatory factor, correlation, and reliability analyses were used for data analysis. Results: As a result of exploratory factor analysis, 10 subfactors were extracted (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin=0.856, Bartlett’s test: χ2=5,044.337, degrees of freedom=780, p<0.001). Among the 40 items, one that showed a high overlapping load for other factors was excluded. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the 10-factor structure model was found suitable (χ2=1.980, comparative fit index=0.859, Tucker-Lewis index=0.841, root mean square error of approximation=0.070). As a result of the criterion validity test, most of the subfactors of the Korean version of the RPQ (K-RPQ) showed a positive correlation with K-SRIS, RinLS, and SECP. The reliability of 10 subfactors was satisfactory, ranging from 0.666 to 0.919. Conclusion: The K-RPQ was confirmed to be a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the level of reflection among Korean medical students in clinical clerkship. This scale can be used as a tool to provide feedback on each student’s level of reflection in clinical clerkship.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to verify whether the Reflective Practice Questionnaire (RPQ) developed by Priddis and Rogers is valid in the Korean context to identify the level of reflection of medical students in clinical practice. Methods: A total of 202 third- and fourth-year medical students from seven universities participated in the study. After receiving approval for use from the authors, a survey was conducted on the students through an adaptation process. The original scale consists of 10 factors with 40 items. The Self-efficacy in Clinical Performance Scale (SECP), Korean Self-reflection and Insight Scale (K-SRIS), and Reflection-in-Learning Scale (RinLS) were used to validate the scale. Exploratory factor, confirmatory factor, correlation, and reliability analyses were used for data analysis. Results: As a result of exploratory factor analysis, 10 subfactors were extracted (Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin=0.856, Bartlett’s test: χ2=5,044.337, degrees of freedom=780, p<0.001). Among the 40 items, one that showed a high overlapping load for other factors was excluded. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, the 10-factor structure model was found suitable (χ2=1.980, comparative fit index=0.859, Tucker-Lewis index=0.841, root mean square error of approximation=0.070). As a result of the criterion validity test, most of the subfactors of the Korean version of the RPQ (K-RPQ) showed a positive correlation with K-SRIS, RinLS, and SECP. The reliability of 10 subfactors was satisfactory, ranging from 0.666 to 0.919. Conclusion: The K-RPQ was confirmed to be a reliable and valid tool to evaluate the level of reflection among Korean medical students in clinical clerkship. This scale can be used as a tool to provide feedback on each student’s level of reflection in clinical clerkship.
참고문헌 (29)
- Aukes LC, "The development of a scale to measure personal reflection in medical practice and education", Med Teach, 29(2-3), pp.177~182 (2007)
- Atkins S, "Reflective practice", Nurs Stand, 9(45), pp.31~35 (1995)
- Asselin ME, "Exploring reflection as a process embedded in experienced nurses’practice : a qualitative study", J Adv Nurs, 69(4), pp.905~914 (2013)
- 황지원, "통찰(Insight)의 개념 분석", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 37(3), pp.353~364 (2007), 한국간호과학회
- Grant AM, "The self-reflection and insight scale : a new measure of private self-consciousness", Soc Behav Pers, 30(8), pp.821~835 (2002)
- Boud D, "Reflection: turning experience into learning" (1985), Kogan Page
- Moon JA, "A handbook of reflective and experiential learning : theory and practice" (2004), Routledge Falmer
- Jarvis-Selinger S, "Competency is not enough : integrating identity formation into the medical education discourse", Acad Med, 87(9), pp.1185~1190 (2012)
- Miller S, "What it’s like being the ‘holder of the space’ : a narrative on working with reflective practice in groups", Reflect Pract, 6(3), pp.367~377 (2005)
- Schön DA, "The reflective practitioner : how professionals think in action" (1983), Basic Books
- General Medical Council, "The Doctor as Teacher", General Medical Council, ~ (1999)
- Skills for the new millennium: report of the Societal Needs Working Group, "Canadian Medical Education Directions for Specialists 2000 Project", Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, ~ (1996)
- ABIM Foundation, "Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter", Ann Intern Med, 136(3), pp.243~246 (2002)
- Cruess RL, "Teaching professionalism : general principles", Med Teach, 28(3), pp.205~208 (2006)
- Mitchell R, "The development of the cognitive behavior survey to assess medical student learning", Teach Learn Med, 6(3), pp.161~167 (1994)
- Sobral DT, "An appraisal of medical students’ reflectionin-learning", Med Educ, 34(3), pp.182~187 (2000)
- Stern DT, "The developing physician : becoming a professional", N Engl J Med, 355(17), pp.1794~1799 (2006)
- Epstein RM, "Defining and assessing professional competence", JAMA, 287(2), pp.226~235 (2002)
- Roberts C, "Readiness for self-directed change in professional behaviours : factorial validation of the Self-Reflection and Insight Scale", Med Educ, 42(11), pp.1054~1063 (2008)
- Mamede S, "The structure of reflective practice in medicine", Med Educ, 38(12), pp.1302~1308 (2004)
- Priddis L, "Development of the reflective practice questionnaire : preliminary findings", Reflect Pract, 19(1), pp.89~104 (2018)
- 송미옥, "간호대학생의 자기-성찰 및 통찰력 측정도구 타당도 및 신뢰도 검증", 기본간호학회지, 25(1), pp.11~21 (2018), 기본간호학회[DOI]
- Park K, "A study on the development and validity of selfefficacy scale", pp.2012
- Hair JF, "Partial least squares structural equation modeling : rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance", Long Range Plan, 46(1-2), pp.1~12 (2013)
- Gerbing DW, "An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment", J Mark Res, 25(2), pp.186~192 (1988)
- Kline RB. Principles, "Principles and practice of structural equation modeling" (2005), The Guilford Press
- Freshwater D, "Therapeutic nursing : improving patient care through self-awareness and reflection" (2002), Sage
- Maudsley G, "Promoting professional knowledge, experiential learning and critical thinking for medical students", Med Educ, 34(7), pp.535~544 (2000)
- Butani L, "How educators conceptualize and teach reflective practice : a survey of North American pediatric medical educators", Acad Pediatr, 17(3), pp.303~309 (2017)