본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Exocentric Compounds, Language and Proto-language

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this paper, I discuss cross-linguistic evidence showing that the internal structure of exocentric VN compounds is asymmetrical, in the sense that the V is hierarchically prominent with respect to the N. Evidence from the Romance languages as well as other languages, where phrasal constituents, as well as adverbs are part of exocentric compounds brings empirical evidence in support of exocentric compounds as hierarchically structured. Hence they cannot be derived by concatenation or Proto-Merge (Jackendoff 1999, 2002), which would assign a flat structure to these expressions, as it has been argued in the gradualist view of language evolution (Progovac and Locke 2009). I argue that the hierarchical structure of exocentric compounds is that of a relative clause, and thus it is derived by the recursive application of Merge (External and Internal). If this is the case, it is expected that the V has inflectional features and that a complement or an adjunct as well as a phrasal constituent can be generated in these constructs. I discuss experimental results bearing on the difference in the acceptability of novel complement-V vs. adjunct-V compounds in English. These results support the hypothesis that hierarchical rather than linear proximity is relevant in the processing of compounds. They also support the emergent view of language

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss cross-linguistic evidence showing that the internal structure of exocentric VN compounds is asymmetrical, in the sense that the V is hierarchically prominent with respect to the N. Evidence from the Romance languages as well as other languages, where phrasal constituents, as well as adverbs are part of exocentric compounds brings empirical evidence in support of exocentric compounds as hierarchically structured. Hence they cannot be derived by concatenation or Proto-Merge (Jackendoff 1999, 2002), which would assign a flat structure to these expressions, as it has been argued in the gradualist view of language evolution (Progovac and Locke 2009). I argue that the hierarchical structure of exocentric compounds is that of a relative clause, and thus it is derived by the recursive application of Merge (External and Internal). If this is the case, it is expected that the V has inflectional features and that a complement or an adjunct as well as a phrasal constituent can be generated in these constructs. I discuss experimental results bearing on the difference in the acceptability of novel complement-V vs. adjunct-V compounds in English. These results support the hypothesis that hierarchical rather than linear proximity is relevant in the processing of compounds. They also support the emergent view of language

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Berwick, R., "The biolinguistic program: The current state of its development, In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty", pp.13~45 (2011), Oxford University Press
  2. Bickerton, D., "Language and Species" (1990), University of Chicago Press
  3. Bickerton, D., "Catastrophic evolution: The case for a single step from protolanguage to full human language, In Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases", pp.341~358 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  4. Bok-Bennema, R., "Taking a closer look at Romance VN compounds, In New Perspectives on Romance Linguistics, vol. 1: Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Pragmatics", pp.13~27 (2005), John Benjamins
  5. Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  6. Chomsky, N., "Derivation by phase", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  7. Chomsky, N., "Three factors in language design", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
  8. Chomsky, N., "The poverty of the stimulus: Unfinished business Mainz talk, In Interfaces in Language Design" (2011)
  9. Chomsky, N., "The biolinguistic program: The current state of its development, In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty", pp.13~45 (2011), Oxford University Press
  10. Coseriu, E., "Gramática, semántica, universales, estudios de lingüística funcional" (1978), Gredos
  11. Di Sciullo, A. M., "Des principes généraux qui couvrent la syntaxe et la morphologie: le cas des composés syntaxiques", Recherches linguistiques à Montréal, 18, pp.197~210 (1982)
  12. Di Sciullo, A. M., "Decomposing compounds", SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 2, pp.14~33 (2005)
  13. Di Sciullo, A. M., "Why are compounds part of natural languages: a view from asymmetry theory, In Handbook of Compounds", pp.145~177 (2009), Oxford University Press
  14. Di Sciullo, A. M., "A biolinguistic approach to morphological variation, In The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty", pp.305~326 (2011), Oxford University Press
  15. Di Sciullo, A. M., "The Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language Faculty" (2011), Oxford University Press
  16. Di Sciullo, A. M., "Compound representation at the interface", GLIP, 6 (2011), Cambridge Scholar
  17. Di Sciullo, A. M., "On the Definition of Word" (1987), The MIT Press
  18. Di Sciullo, A. M., "The biological nature of human language", Biolinguisics, 4, pp.4~34 (2010)
  19. Franco, L., "A Nanosyntactic Account of Romance VN Compounds" (2010), Università Ca' Foscari
  20. Gil, D., "Where does predication come from?, In Manuscript, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology" (2011), Leipzig
  21. Hauser, M., "The faculty of language : What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?", Science, 298, pp.1569~1579 (2002)
  22. Hurford, J. R., "Prototought had no logical names, In New Essays on the Origin of Language", pp.119~132 (2001), Mouton de Gruyter
  23. Jackendoff, R., "Possible stages in the evolution of the language capacity", Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, pp.272~279 (1999)
  24. Jackendoff, R., "Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evo-lution" (2002), Oxford University Press
  25. Jenkins, L., "Biolinguistics: Exploring the Biology of Language" (2000), Cambridge University Press
  26. Jenkins, L., "Variation and Universals in Biolinguistics" (2004), Elsevier
  27. Larson, R., "The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives" (2010), Cambridge University Press
  28. Lenneberg, E. H., "Biological Foundations of Language" (1967), John Wiley
  29. Pinker, S., "Natural language and natural selection", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13 (1990)
  30. Poeppel, D., "Defining the relation between linguistics and neuroscience, In Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones" (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum
  31. Progovac, L., "Syntax : Its evolution and its representation in the brain", Biolinguistics, 4, pp.2~3 (2010)
  32. Progovac, L., "The urge to merge: Ritual insult and the evolution of syntax", Biolinguistics, 3(2-3), pp.337~354 (2009)
  33. Roeper, T., "Language learnability and the forms of recursion, In UG and External Systems", pp.155~169 (2005), John Benjamins
  34. Tollemache, F., "Le parole composte nella lingua italiana" (1945), Rores
  35. Tsapkini, K., "The role of configurational asymmetry in the lexical access of prefixed verbs : Evidence from French", Brain and Language, 90, pp.143~150 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)